Addressing sexual concerns of female breast cancer survivors and partners: a qualitative study of survivors, partners, and oncology providers about Internet intervention preferences

被引:10
|
作者
Shaffer, Kelly M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kennedy, Erin [1 ,4 ]
Glazer, Jillian V. [2 ]
Clayton, Anita H. [3 ]
Cohn, Wendy [1 ,4 ]
Millard, Trish A. [1 ,5 ]
Ritterband, Lee M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Showalter, Shayna [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, UVA Canc Ctr, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Ctr Behav Hlth & Technol, POB 801075, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Psychiat & Neurobehav Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Publ Hlth Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[5] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Med Hematol Oncol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[6] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Surg Surg Oncol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Cancer survivors; Internet-based intervention; Qualitative research; Sexual dysfunction; Spouses; INTIMACY ENHANCEMENT INTERVENTION; INDEX FSFI; HEALTH; COMMUNICATION; CARE; EXPERIENCES; PREVALENCE; VALIDATION; MORBIDITY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-021-06302-w
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Sexual side effects after breast cancer treatment are common and distressing to both survivors and their intimate partners, yet few receive interventions to address cancer-related sexual concerns. To direct intervention development, this qualitative study assessed the perceptions of female breast cancer survivors, intimate partners of breast cancer survivors, and breast cancer oncology providers about how an Internet intervention for couples may address breast cancer-related sexual concerns. Methods Survivors (N = 20) responded to online open-ended surveys. Partners (N = 12) and providers (N = 8) completed individual semi-structured interviews. Data were inductively coded using thematic content analysis. Results Three primary intervention content areas were identified by the key stakeholder groups: (1) information about and strategies to manage physical and psychological effects of cancer treatment on sexual health, (2) relationship and communication support, and (3) addressing bodily changes and self-image after treatment. Survivors and partners tended to express interest in some individualized intervention private from their partner, although they also emphasized the importance of opening communication about sexual concerns within the couple. Survivors and partners expressed interest in an intervention that addresses changing needs across the cancer trajectory, available from the time of diagnosis and through survivorship. Conclusion Internet intervention for couples to address cancer-related sexual concerns, particularly one that provides basic education about treatment side effects and that evolves with couples' changing needs across the cancer trajectory, was perceived as a valuable addition to breast cancer care by survivors, partners, and providers.
引用
收藏
页码:7451 / 7460
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measuring female breast cancer survivors' concerns about late effects of treatment: initial development of the Concerns about Late Effects in Oncology Questionnaire (CLEO)
    Henry, Georgina
    Butow, Phyllis
    Juraskova, Ilona
    Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah
    Shaw, Joanne
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (04) : 3563 - 3572
  • [32] Measuring female breast cancer survivors’ concerns about late effects of treatment: initial development of the Concerns about Late Effects in Oncology Questionnaire (CLEO)
    Georgina Henry
    Phyllis Butow
    Ilona Juraskova
    Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell
    Joanne Shaw
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 3563 - 3572
  • [33] Cardiovascular Assessment Tool for Breast Cancer Survivors and Oncology Providers: Usability Study
    Weaver, Kathryn E.
    Klepin, Heidi D.
    Wells, Brian J.
    Dressler, Emily, V
    Winkfield, Karen M.
    Lamar, Zanetta S.
    Avery, Tiffany P.
    Pajewski, Nicholas M.
    Hundley, W. Gregory
    Johnson, Aimee
    Davidson, Eleanor C.
    Lopetegui, Marcelo
    Foraker, Randi E.
    [J]. JMIR CANCER, 2021, 7 (01):
  • [34] Attitudes and Beliefs of Older Female Breast Cancer Survivors and Providers About Exercise in Cancer Care
    Perry, Cynthia K.
    Bin Ali, Wafaa
    Solanki, Emma
    Winters-Stone, Kerri
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2020, 47 (01) : 56 - 69
  • [35] Mobile Health Physical Activity Intervention Preferences in Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study
    Robertson, Michael C.
    Tsai, Edward
    Lyons, Elizabeth J.
    Srinivasan, Sanjana
    Swartz, Maria C.
    Baum, Miranda L.
    Basen-Engquist, Karen M.
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2017, 5 (01):
  • [36] Factors associated with specific DSM-IV sexual dysfunctions among breast cancer survivors: A study of patients and their partners
    Hummel, Lisanne
    van Lankveld, Jacques
    Oldenburg, Hester
    Hahn, Daniela
    Broomans, Eva
    Aaronson, Neil
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 26 : 129 - 130
  • [37] Sexual issues in partnered breast cancer survivors-A qualitative study
    Chang, Yun-Chen
    Chiu, Shih-Che
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 : 198 - 198
  • [38] Sexual life after mastectomy in breast cancer survivors: A qualitative study
    Fouladi, Nasrin
    Pourfarzi, Farhad
    Dolattorkpour, Negin
    Alimohammadi, Sara
    Mehrara, Elham
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 (02) : 434 - 441
  • [39] Barriers to Sexual Health Communication in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study
    Masjoudi, Marzieh
    Keshavarz, Zohre
    Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil
    Kashani, Farah Lotfi
    Nasiri, Malihe
    Mirzaei, Hamid Reza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (05) : XC01 - XC04
  • [40] Partners of young breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional evaluation of psychosocial concerns, coping, and mental health
    Borstelmann, Nancy A.
    Rosenberg, Shoshana
    Gelber, Shari
    Zheng, Yue
    Meyer, Meghan
    Ruddy, Kathryn J.
    Schapira, Lidia
    Come, Steven
    Borges, Virginia
    Cadet, Tamara
    Maramaldi, Peter
    Partridge, Ann H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06) : 670 - 686