Radiative forcing of climate change from the Copernicus reanalysis of atmospheric composition

被引:33
|
作者
Bellouin, Nicolas [1 ]
Davies, Will [1 ]
Shine, Keith P. [1 ]
Quaas, Johannes [2 ]
Muelmenstaedt, Johannes [2 ,8 ]
Forster, Piers M. [3 ]
Smith, Chris [3 ]
Lee, Lindsay [4 ,9 ]
Regayre, Leighton [4 ]
Brasseur, Guy [5 ]
Sudarchikova, Natalia [5 ]
Bouarar, Idir [5 ]
Boucher, Olivier [6 ]
Myhre, Gunnar [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept Meteorol, Reading RG6 6BB, Berks, England
[2] Univ Leipzig, Inst Meteorol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Leeds, Priestley Int Ctr Climate, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Inst Climate & Atmospher Sci, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[6] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, Inst Pierre Simon Lapl, F-75252 Paris, France
[7] Ctr Int Climate & Environm Res Oslo CICERO, N-0318 Oslo, Norway
[8] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Atmospher Sci & Global Change Div, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[9] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Dept Engn & Math, Sheffield S1 1WB, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
TROPOSPHERIC OZONE; OPTICAL-PROPERTIES; DATA ASSIMILATION; AEROSOL INFLUENCE; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; EMISSIONS; SYSTEM; CARBON; ATTRIBUTION;
D O I
10.5194/essd-12-1649-2020
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Radiative forcing provides an important basis for understanding and predicting global climate changes, but its quantification has historically been done independently for different forcing agents, has involved observations to varying degrees, and studies have not always included a detailed analysis of uncertainties. The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service reanalysis is an optimal combination of modelling and observations of atmospheric composition. It provides a unique opportunity to rely on observations to quantify the monthly and spatially resolved global distributions of radiative forcing consistently for six of the largest forcing agents: carbon dioxide, methane, tropospheric ozone, stratospheric ozone, aerosol-radiation interactions, and aerosolcloud interactions. These radiative-forcing estimates account for adjustments in stratospheric temperatures but do not account for rapid adjustments in the troposphere. On a global average and over the period 2003-2017, stratospherically adjusted radiative forcing of carbon dioxide has averaged +1.89 W m(-2) (5 %-95% confidence interval: 1.50 to 2.29 W m(-2)) relative to 1750 and increased at a rate of 18% per decade. The corresponding values for methane are +0.46 (0.36 to 0.56) W m(-2) and 4% per decade but with a clear acceleration since 2007. Ozone radiative-forcing averages +0.32 (0 to 0.64) W m(-2), almost entirely contributed by tropospheric ozone since stratospheric ozone radiative forcing is only +0.003W m(-2). Aerosol radiative-forcing averages 1.25 (1.98 to 0.52) W m(-2), with aerosol-radiation interactions contributing 0.56 W m(-2) and aerosolcloud interactions contributing 0.69 W m(-2) to the global average. Both have been relatively stable since 2003. Taking the six forcing agents together, there is no indication of a sustained slowdown or acceleration in the rate of increase in anthropogenic radiative forcing over the period. These ongoing radiative-forcing estimates will monitor the impact on the Earth's energy budget of the dramatic emission reductions towards net-zero that are needed to limit surface temperature warming to the Paris Agreement temperature targets. Indeed, such impacts should be clearly manifested in radiative forcing before being clear in the temperature record. In addition, this radiative-forcing dataset can provide the input distributions needed by researchers involved in monitoring of climate change, detection and attribution, interannual to decadal prediction, and integrated assessment modelling. The data generated by this work are available at https://doi.org/10.24380/ads.1hj3y896 (Bellouin et al., 2020b).
引用
收藏
页码:1649 / 1677
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Atmospheric radiative feedbacks associated with transient climate change and climate variability
    Robert A. Colman
    Scott B. Power
    Climate Dynamics, 2010, 34 : 919 - 933
  • [32] Monitoring global atmospheric constituents capable of forcing climate change
    Schnell, RC
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES II, 1999, 3853 : 2 - 14
  • [33] Critical Review on Radiative Forcing and Climate Models for Global Climate Change since 1970
    Lu, Qing-Bin
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (08)
  • [34] An alternative to radiative forcing for estimating the relative importance of climate change mechanisms
    Shine, KP
    Cook, J
    Highwood, EJ
    Joshi, MM
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (20) : 4 - 1
  • [35] Atmospheric ionization and cloud radiative forcing
    Henrik Svensmark
    Jacob Svensmark
    Martin Bødker Enghoff
    Nir J. Shaviv
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [36] Atmospheric ionization and cloud radiative forcing
    Svensmark, Henrik
    Svensmark, Jacob
    Enghoff, Martin Bodker
    Shaviv, Nir J.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [37] Some aspects on the use and impact of observations in the ERA5 Copernicus Climate Change Service reanalysis
    Horanyi, Andras
    IDOJARAS, 2017, 121 (04): : 329 - 344
  • [38] The role of atmospheric aerosol composition in climate change
    Su Weihan Wang ShaobinResearch Center for Eco- Environmental Sciences
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1993, (02) : 169 - 175
  • [39] The CAMS reanalysis of atmospheric composition
    Inness, Antje
    Ades, Melanie
    Agusti-Panareda, Anna
    Barre, Jerome
    Benedictow, Anna
    Blechschmidt, Anne-Marlene
    Dominguez, Juan Jose
    Engelen, Richard
    Eskes, Henk
    Flemming, Johannes
    Huijnen, Vincent
    Jones, Luke
    Kipling, Zak
    Massart, Sebastien
    Parrington, Mark
    Pench, Vincent-Henri
    Razinger, Miha
    Remy, Samuel
    Schulz, Michael
    Suttie, Martin
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2019, 19 (06) : 3515 - 3556
  • [40] Climate change and upwelling: response of Iberian upwelling to atmospheric forcing in a regional climate scenario
    Miranda, P. M. A.
    Alves, J. M. R.
    Serra, N.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2013, 40 (11-12) : 2813 - 2824