Magnetic resonance imaging on disease reclassification among active surveillance candidates with low-risk prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis

被引:47
|
作者
Guo, R.
Cai, L.
Fan, Y.
Jin, J.
Zhou, L.
Zhang, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Urol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
关键词
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; ENDORECTAL MR; TEST ACCURACY; BIOPSY; MEN; INTERVENTION; PERFORMANCE; TUMOR; STAGE; SIZE;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2015.20
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) is an increasingly important attempt to avoid overtreatment of patients who harbor clinically insignificant disease while offering curative treatment to those in whom disease is reclassified as higher risk after an observation period and repeat biopsy. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting upgrading on confirmatory biopsy in men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) on AS. METHODS: We searched the PubMed for pertinent studies up to November 2014. We used standard methods recommended for meta-analyses of diagnostic test evaluations. The analysis was based on a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Meta-regression analysis was used to assess the effects of some confounding factors on the results of the meta-analysis. The potential presence of publication bias was tested using the Deeks' funnel plots. RESULTS: Seven studies provided the diagnostic data on MRI and AS of PCa, comprising 1028 patients. The pooled estimates of MRI on disease reclassification among AS candidates were as follows: sensitivity, 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.44-0.86); specificity, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.53-0.91); positive likelihood ratio, 3.1 (95% CI, 1.6-6.0); negative likelihood ratio, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.23-0.70); and diagnostic odds ratio, 8 (95% CI, 4-16). The P-value for heterogeneity was < 0.001. We found that the SROC curve is positioned toward the desirable upper left corner of the curve, and the area under the curve was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83). For a pretest probability of 0.20, the corresponding positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.44 and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 0.91. MRI may reveal an unrecognized significant lesion in 33.27% of patients, and biopsy of these areas reclassified 14.59% of cases as no longer fulfilling the criteria for AS. In addition, when no suspicious disease progression (66.34%) was identified on MRI, the chance of reclassification on repeat biopsy was extremely low at 6.13%. CONCLUSIONS: MRI, especially multiparametric (MP)-MRI, has a moderate diagnostic accuracy as a significant predictor of disease reclassification among AS candidates. The high NPV and specificity for the prediction of biopsy reclassification upon clinical follow-up suggest that negative prostate MRI findings may support a patient remaining under AS. Although the PPV and sensitivity for the prediction were relatively low, the presence of a suspicious lesion > 10 mm lesion may suggest an increased risk for disease progression.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 228
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Magnetic resonance imaging-guided targeted biopsy in risk classification among patients on active surveillance A diagnostic meta-analysis
    Xue, Wenbin
    Huang, Yu
    Li, Tao
    Tan, Ping
    Liu, Liangren
    Yang, Lu
    Wei, Qiang
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (26)
  • [22] Active surveillance of low-risk papillary thyroid cancer: A meta-analysis Discussion
    Kandil, Emad
    Saravana-Bawan, Bianka
    Javid, Mahsa
    Mitchell, Brad
    Miyauchi, Akira
    SURGERY, 2020, 167 (01) : 54 - 55
  • [23] Re: "Active surveillance of low-risk papillary thyroid cancer: A meta-analysis"
    Cho, Se Jin
    Baek, Jung Hwan
    SURGERY, 2020, 167 (05) : 885 - +
  • [24] The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review
    Alshehri, Sultan Zaher
    Alshahrani, Omar Safar
    Almsaoud, Nazal Ahmed
    Al-Ghamdi, Muhammad Ahmad
    Alqahtani, Abdulaziz Mohammed
    Almurayyi, Muath Mohammed
    Autwdi, Ali Salem
    Al-Ghamdi, Saeed Ahmed
    Zogan, Mohammed Mesadef
    Alamri, Abdulrahim Mohammed
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 57 : 171 - 178
  • [25] Outcomes of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Subsequent Biopsy in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance
    Hsiang, Walter
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Syed, Jamil S.
    Holder, Justin
    Nguyen, Kevin A.
    Suarez-Sarmiento, Alfredo
    Huber, Steffen
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (01): : 47 - 54
  • [26] Active surveillance preferred for low-risk prostate cancer
    Bagcchi, Sanjeet
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (08): : E384 - E384
  • [27] Is There a Role for Active Surveillance in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer?
    Augustin, Herbert
    Mayerhofer, Katrin
    Seles, Maximilian
    Pummer, Karl
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 95 (02) : 125 - 131
  • [28] PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX AND MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING TO PREDICT PROSTATE CANCER GRADE RECLASSIFICATION IN ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Schwen, Zeyad
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Tosoian, Jeffrey
    Druskin, Sasha
    Ross, Ashley
    Sokoll, Lori
    Epstein, Jonathan
    Pavlovich, Christian
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E144 - E144
  • [29] Prostate Health Index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict prostate cancer grade reclassification in active surveillance
    Schwen, Zeyad R.
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Druskin, Sasha C.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Sokoll, Lori J.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Carter, Herbert Ballentine
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (03) : 373 - 378
  • [30] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
    Large, Michael C.
    Eggener, Scott E.
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2009, 23 (11): : 974 - 979