Comparison of semi-quantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI evaluations of vertebral marrow perfusion in a rat osteoporosis model

被引:6
|
作者
Zhu, Jingqi [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Zuogang [1 ]
Zhang, Jiulong [1 ]
Qiu, Yuyou [1 ]
Hua, Ting [1 ]
Tang, Guangyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, 301 Middle Yanchang Rd, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, East Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Shanghai 200120, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Osteoporosis; Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; Micro-computed tomography; Vascular endothelial cell; Microvessel density; BLOOD PERFUSION; BONE-MARROW; LIKELY CAUSES; FAT-CONTENT; DCE-MRI; PARAMETERS; DIFFUSION; REDUCTION; DENSITY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-017-1800-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study aims to investigate the technical feasibility of semi-quantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in the assessment of longitudinal changes of marrow perfusion in a rat osteoporosis model, using bone mineral density (BMD) measured by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histopathology as the gold standards. Methods: Fifty rats were randomly assigned to the control group (n=25) and ovariectomy (OVX) group whose bilateral ovaries were excised (n=25). Semi-quantitative and quantitative DCE-MRI, micro-CT, and histopathological examinations were performed on lumbar vertebrae at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks after operation. The differences between the two groups in terms of semi-quantitative DCE-MRI parameter (maximum enhancement, E-max)(,) quantitative DCE-MRI parameters (volume transfer constant, K-trans; interstitial volume, V-e; and efflux rate constant, K-ep), micro-CT parameter (BMD), and histopathological parameter (microvessel density, MVD) were compared at each of the time points using an independent-sample t test. The differences in these parameters between baseline and other time points in each group were assessed via Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. A Pearson correlation analysis was applied to assess the relationships between DCE-MRI, micro-CT, and histopathological parameters. Results: In the OVX group, the E-max values decreased significantly compared with those of the control group at weeks 6 and 9 (p=0.003 and 0.004, respectively). The K-trans values decreased significantly compared with those of the control group from week 3 (p<0.05). However, the Ve values decreased significantly only at week 9 (p=0.032), and no difference in the K-ep was found between two groups. The BMD values of the OVX group decreased significantly compared with those of the control group from week 3 (p<0.05). Transmission electron microscopy showed tighter gaps between vascular endothelial cells with swollen mitochondria in the OVX group from week 3. The MVD values of the OVX group decreased significantly compared with those of the control group only at week 12 (p=0.023). A weak positive correlation of E-max and a strong positive correlation of K-trans with MVD were found. Conclusions: Compared with semi-quantitative DCE-MRI, the quantitative DCE-MRI parameterK(trans) is a more sensitive and accurate index for detecting early reduced perfusion in osteoporotic bone.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantitative myocardial distribution volume from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Pack, Nathan A.
    DiBella, Edward V. R.
    Wilson, Brent D.
    McGann, Christopher J.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 26 (04) : 532 - 542
  • [42] Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI datasets of the metacarpophalangeal joints
    Kubassova, Olga A.
    Boyle, Roger D.
    Radjenovic, Aleksandra
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (10) : 1189 - 1200
  • [43] Limitations of the keyhole technique for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Bishop, JE
    Santyr, GE
    Kelcz, F
    Plewes, DB
    [J]. JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 7 (04): : 716 - 723
  • [44] Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in newly presenting glioma
    Jackson, A
    Jayson, GC
    Li, KL
    Zhu, XP
    Checkley, DR
    Tessier, JJL
    Waterton, JC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 76 (903): : 153 - 162
  • [45] A COMPARISON OF QUANTITATIVE AND SEMI-QUANTITATIVE MRI SYNOVITIS SCORES IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS
    Rhodes, L. A.
    Grainger, A. J.
    Keenan, A. M.
    Emery, P.
    Conaghan, P. G.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2004, 43 : 63 - 63
  • [46] Specific Preoperative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Semi-quantitative Markers Can Correlate With Vascularity in Specific Areas of Glioblastoma Tissue and Predict Recurrence
    Azab, Mohammed A.
    Ghozy, Sherief
    Hassanein, Sherif F.
    Azzam, Ahmed Y.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [47] SEMI-QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROSTATE PERFUSION MRI BY CLUSTERING OF PRE AND POST CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT PHASES
    Samarasinghe, Gihan
    Sowmya, Arcot
    Moses, Daniel Aaron
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI), 2016, : 943 - 947
  • [48] Inter- and Intrarater Reproducibility of Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Using TWIST Perfusion Data in a Uterine Fibroid Model
    Davenport, M.
    Heye, T.
    Dale, B.
    Horvath, J.
    Breault, S.
    Feuerlein, S.
    Boll, D.
    Merkle, E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (05)
  • [49] Quantitative Analysis of Prostate MRI: Correlation between Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters
    Choi, Moon-Hyung
    Lee, Young-Joon
    Han, Dongyeob
    Kim, Dong-Hyun
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (12) : 10299 - 10310
  • [50] Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of bone marrow perfusion at the proximal femur: influence of femoral head osteonecrosis risk factor and overt osteonecrosis
    Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira
    Lauriane Dubois
    Gabriela Hossu
    Romain Gillet
    Sammy Badr
    Anne Cotten
    Alain Blum
    [J]. European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 2340 - 2349