Reduced-form models for power market risk analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Roden, David C. [1 ]
Fischbeck, Paul S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Electric power generation; Monte Carlo simulation; Neural networks; Quantitative risk analysis; Reduced-form modeling; NEURAL NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION MODEL; SURROGATE MODELS; ELECTRICITY; INVESTMENT; UNCERTAINTY; REQUIREMENTS; TRANSITION; GENERATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.044
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The experience of the last fifteen years has illustrated dramatically the emergence of new risks facing power market investors. The volatility of commodity prices, the strategic behavior of competing firms, and regulatory uncertainty all contribute to a challenging investment and operating environment. Traditionally, utilities and power-market investors have used large-scale optimizing production-cost models to analyze the cash flows of power generators. The complexity of these models, particularly when applied on a regional or national scale, is such that computational costs often prohibit extensive analysis of commodity, regulatory, and structural risks. This article demonstrates how a reduced-form modeling approach utilizing neural networks can be used to increase greatly the ability of modelers to use modern simulation-based risk analysis techniques. In particular, several applications relevant to evaluating the cash flow risks of generators, with applications to hedging, are presented. Central to the contributions of this paper is our reduction of complex optimizing models to spread-sheet form, reducing not only their computational complexity, but also their practical user complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:1640 / 1655
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Option pricing: the reduced-form SDE model
    Rukanda, G. S.
    Govinder, K. S.
    O'Hara, J. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 28 (04) : 590 - 604
  • [32] Does market power affect performance in the dutch banking market? a comparison of reduced form market structure models
    J. W. B. Bos
    [J]. De Economist, 2004, 152 : 491 - 512
  • [33] Does market power affect performance in the Dutch banking market? A comparison of reduced form market structure models
    Bos, JWB
    [J]. ECONOMIST-NETHERLANDS, 2004, 152 (04): : 491 - 512
  • [34] Semiparametric reduced-form estimation of tuition subsidies
    Ichimura, H
    Taber, C
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (02): : 286 - 292
  • [35] A Reduced-Form Approach to Behavioral Public Finance
    Mullainathan, Sendhil
    Schwartzstein, Joshua
    Congdon, William J.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 4, 2012, 4 : 511 - 540
  • [36] REDUCED-FORM FRAMEWORK UNDER MODEL UNCERTAINTY
    Biagini, Francesca
    Zhang, Yinglin
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2019, 29 (04): : 2481 - 2522
  • [37] Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: A note
    Arora, A
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1996, 50 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [38] Quantifying Reduced-Form Evidence on Collateral Constraints
    Catherine, Sylvain
    Chaney, Thomas
    Huang, Zongbo
    Sraer, David
    Thesmar, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2022, 77 (04): : 2143 - 2181
  • [39] Direct and Inverse Reduced-Form Models for Reciprocal Calculation of BC Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations
    Yu, Xinyuan
    Zhong, Qirui
    Zhang, Wenxiao
    Meng, Wenjun
    Yun, Xiao
    Xu, Haoran
    Shen, Huizhong
    Shen, Guofeng
    Ma, Jianmin
    Cheng, Hefa
    Li, Bengang
    Liu, Junfeng
    Tao, Shu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 55 (15) : 10300 - 10309
  • [40] iPlan: A Platform for Constructing Localized, Reduced-Form Models of Land-Use Impacts
    Ruis, Andrew R.
    Barford, Carol
    Brohinsky, Jais
    Tan, Yuanru
    Bougie, Matthew
    Cai, Zhiqiang
    Lark, Tyler J.
    Shaffer, David Williamson
    [J]. MULTIMODAL TECHNOLOGIES AND INTERACTION, 2024, 8 (04)