共 29 条
Surgical Classification of Radical Temporal Bone Resection and Transcranial Tympanotomy: A Retrospective Study from the Neurosurgical Perspective
被引:3
|作者:
Iwami, Kenichiro
[1
]
Fujii, Masazumi
[3
]
Nishio, Naoki
[4
]
Maruo, Takashi
[4
]
Yoshida, Tadao
[4
]
Mukoyama, Nobuaki
[4
]
Osuka, Koji
[1
]
Takanari, Keisuke
[6
]
Murotani, Kenta
[7
]
Kamei, Yuzuru
[5
]
Sone, Michihiko
[4
]
Fujimoto, Yasushi
[2
]
Saito, Kiyoshi
[3
]
机构:
[1] Aichi Med Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
[2] Aichi Med Univ, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
[3] Fukushima Med Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Fukushima, Japan
[4] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[5] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[6] Aichi Canc Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[7] Kurume Univ, Biostat Ctr, Grad Sch Med, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词:
Lateral skull base malignancies;
Surgical classification;
Temporal bone resection;
SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA;
MIDDLE-EAR;
CANCER;
D O I:
10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.002
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
OBJECTIVE: To review the authors' surgical experience with radical temporal bone resection (TBR) with an emphasis on the classification of skull base osteotomy and transcranial tympanotomy (TCT) that is required for middle ear transection. -METHODS: We reviewed the records of 25 patients who -nderwent radical TBR at our facilities between 2011 and 2020. -RESULTS: The osteotomy line of radical TBR was divided into 3 segments: anterior (A), medial (M), and posterior (P). Each segment was further classified as follows: A1, through the glenoid fossa (1 patient); A2, in front of the glenoid fossa (23 patients); A3, through the greater wing of the sphenoid bone (1 patient); M1, through the middle ear (16 patients); M2, through the inner ear (9 patients); P1, through the mastoid (9 patients); and P2, through the posterior cranial fossa (16 patients). The M segment was significantly associated with operation time and intraoperative blood loss. In all patients with M1 osteotomy, TCT was performed; TCT was classified into superior and far posterior approaches. A superior approach was performed in all 16 patients, whereas the far posterior approach was performed in only 7 patients with both M1 and P2 osteotomy. - CONCLUSIONS: Our newly proposed osteotomy classification of radical TBR is suitable for minute but clinically important adjustment of the osteotomy line. TCT is an indispensable technique for M1 osteotomy; our newly proposed classification expands our understanding of TCT and how to incorporate this technique into radical TBR.
引用
收藏
页码:E192 / E207
页数:16
相关论文