Economic evaluation of nurse staffing and nurse substitution in health care: A scoping review

被引:28
|
作者
Goryakin, Yevgeniy [1 ]
Griffiths, Peter [1 ]
Maben, Jill [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Natl Nursing Res Unit, London, England
关键词
Workforce; Nurse staffing; Skill mix; Substitution; Economic evaluation; Cost-effectiveness; Nurse practitioners; Nurse-led care; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PATIENT; OUTCOMES; PRACTITIONERS; ASSOCIATION; RATIOS; STAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.07.018
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: Several systematic reviews have suggested that greater nurse staffing as well as a greater proportion of registered nurses in the health workforce is associated with better patient outcomes. Others have found that nurses can substitute for doctors safely and effectively in a variety of settings. However, these reviews do not generally consider the effect of nurse staff on both patient outcomes and costs of care, and therefore say little about the cost-effectiveness of nurse-provided care. Therefore, we conducted a scoping literature review of economic evaluation studies which consider the link between nurse staffing, skill mix within the nursing team and between nurses and other medical staff to determine the nature of the available economic evidence. Design: Scoping literature review. Data sources: English-language manuscripts, published between 1989 and 2009, focussing on the relationship between costs and effects of care and the level of registered nurse staffing or nurse-physician substitution/nursing skill mix in the clinical team, using cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, or cost-benefit analysis. Articles selected for the review were identified through Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Google Scholar database searches. Review methods: After selecting 17 articles representing 16 unique studies for review, we summarized their main findings, and assessed their methodological quality using criteria derived from recommendations from the guidelines proposed by the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health Care. Results: In general, it was found that nurses can provide cost effective care, compared to other health professionals. On the other hand, more intensive nurse staffing was associated with both better outcomes and more expensive care, and therefore cost effectiveness was not easy to assess. Conclusions: Although considerable progress in economic evaluation studies has been reached in recent years, a number of methodological issues remain. In the future, nurse researchers should be more actively engaged in the design and implementation of economic evaluation studies of the services they provide. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 512
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Health care: Mandatory nurse-to-patient staffing ratios in California
    Berman, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2002, 30 (02): : 312 - 313
  • [22] Competencies and scope of practice of nurse practitioners in primary health care: a scoping review protocol
    Schlunegger, Margarithe Charlotte
    Aeschlimann, Simona
    Palm, Rebecca
    Zumstein-Shaha, Maya
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (04) : 899 - 905
  • [23] Nurse Staffing and Quality of Care With Direct Measurement of Inpatient Staffing
    Harless, David W.
    Mark, Barbara A.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2010, 48 (07) : 659 - 663
  • [24] The association between nurse staffing and omissions in nursing care: A systematic review
    Griffiths, Peter
    Recio-Saucedo, Alejandra
    Dall'Ora, Chiara
    Briggs, Jim
    Maruotti, Antonello
    Meredith, Paul
    Smith, Gary B.
    Ball, Jane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2018, 74 (07) : 1474 - 1487
  • [25] How do nurse practitioners work in primary health care settings? A scoping review
    Grant, Julian
    Lines, Lauren
    Darbyshire, Philip
    Parry, Yvonne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2017, 75 : 51 - 57
  • [26] Outcomes sensitive to critical care nurse staffing levels: A systematic review
    Rae, Pamela J. L.
    Pearce, Susie
    Greaves, P. Jane
    Dall'Ora, Chiara
    Griffiths, Peter
    Endacott, Ruth
    [J]. INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2021, 67
  • [27] Nurse practitioner models of care in aged care: a scoping review protocol
    Peters, Micah D. J.
    Marnie, Casey
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (08) : 2064 - 2070
  • [28] Economic evaluation of nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist roles: A methodological review
    Lopatina, Elena
    Donald, Faith
    DiCenso, Alba
    Martin-Misener, Ruth
    Kilpatrick, Kelley
    Bryant-Lukosius, Denise
    Carter, Nancy
    Reid, Kim
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2017, 72 : 71 - 82
  • [29] Determining Nurse Staffing for Peritoneal Dialysis Care
    Figueiredo, Ana Elizabeth
    Urbanetto, Janete de Souza
    Bernardini, Judith
    Vieira, Kamyla Lameira
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL, 2016, 43 (05) : 419 - 426
  • [30] Impact of Nurse Work Environment and Staffing on Hospital Nurse and Quality of Care in Thailand
    Nantsupawat, Apiradee
    Srisuphan, Wichit
    Kunaviktikul, Wipada
    Wichaikhum, Orn-Anong
    Aungsuroch, Yupin
    Aiken, Linda H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2011, 43 (04) : 426 - 433