Dynamics of phosphorus exchange between sediment and water in a gravel-bed river

被引:6
|
作者
Wilcock, Robert J. [1 ]
McDowell, Richard W. [2 ]
Quinn, John M. [3 ]
Rutherford, J. Christopher [4 ]
Young, Roger G. [5 ]
Depree, Craig, V [6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Hamilton, New Zealand
[2] AgResearch, Lincoln Sci Ctr, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Freshwater, Hamilton, New Zealand
[4] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Napier, New Zealand
[5] Cawthron Inst, Nelson, New Zealand
[6] DairyNZ, Water Qual, Hamilton, New Zealand
关键词
Phosphorus; sediment; pH; photosynthesis; periphyton; gravel-bed; river; feedback loop; LAKE-SEDIMENTS; BOUNDARY-LAYER; PERIPHYTON; PHOSPHATE; PH; CHEMISTRY; RELEASE; TEMPERATURE; INDICATORS; SHALLOW;
D O I
10.1080/00288330.2020.1741402
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Phosphorus (P) stores in gravel-bed rivers are released for uptake by periphyton when pH levels exceed 8.5. The Tukituki River has low alkalinity water and frequently experiences periphyton blooms, and daytime pH > 9 during summer low-flows. We measured dissolved reactive P (DRP) and EPC0, the water concentration of DRP at which no net release or sorption from the river bed occurs, in sediment samples from the Tukituki River subject to controlled pH levels before (2014) and after (2017) changes to two wastewater discharges that reduced P release to the river by 95%. DRP released from 2014 sediments at pH 8.5-10 were 30 +/- 10 mg/m(3) above background (pH 8) whereas those released from 2017 sediments were 5 +/- 3 mg/m(3) above background. EPC0 levels in 2014 and 2017 were 11 +/- 6 and 7 +/- 2 mg/m(3), respectively. Field estimates of released DRP calculated from continuous pH and the Redfield equation suggested that most of the readily available DRP released from sediments at elevated pH is derived from material attached to recently deposited sediment. Subsequently, a reduction in wastewater inputs or agricultural runoff should reduce sediment DRP stores, and hence sediment fluxes, within a few years and mitigate periphyton blooms in addition to directly lowering water column concentrations.
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 678
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hydrograph Shape Impact on Sand Infiltration and Sediment Transport Dynamics in Gravel-Bed Rivers
    Ravazzolo, D.
    Mao, L.
    Friedrich, H.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2022, 58 (10)
  • [42] Effects of river discharge on hyporheic exchange flows in salmon spawning areas of a large gravel-bed river
    Hanrahan, Timothy P.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2008, 22 (01) : 127 - 141
  • [43] A NOTE ON CLUSTER BEDFORM BEHAVIOR IN A GRAVEL-BED RIVER
    BILLI, P
    [J]. CATENA, 1988, 15 (05) : 473 - 481
  • [44] Effect of changes in fine-grained matrix on bedload sediment transport in a gravel-bed river
    Barzilai, Ronel
    Laronne, Jonathan B.
    Reid, Ian
    [J]. EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2013, 38 (05) : 441 - 448
  • [45] Roughness coefficient and its uncertainty in gravel-bed river
    Kim, Ji-Sung
    Lee, Chan-Joo
    Kim, Won
    Kim, Yong-Jeon
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2010, 3 (02) : 217 - 232
  • [46] Roughness coefficient and its uncertainty in gravel-bed river
    Ji-Sung KIM
    Chan-Joo LEE
    Won KIM
    Yong-Jeon KIM
    [J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2010, 3 (02) : 217 - 232
  • [47] Quantifying channel development and sediment transfer following chute cutoff in a wandering gravel-bed river
    Fuller, IC
    Large, ARG
    Milan, DJ
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2003, 54 (3-4) : 307 - 323
  • [48] Estimation of gravel-bed river flow resistance - Discussion
    Aberle, J
    Dittrich, A
    Nestmann, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1999, 125 (12): : 1315 - 1317
  • [49] Is the unsaturated sediment a neglected habitat for riparian arthropods? Evidence from a large gravel-bed river
    Langhans, Simone D.
    Tockner, Klement
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2014, 2 : 129 - 137
  • [50] COARSE-PARTICLE TRANSPORT IN A GRAVEL-BED RIVER
    William W.EMMETT1
    [J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 1996, (02) : 8 - 21