Predictive ability of preoperative CT scan for the intraoperative difficulty and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection

被引:2
|
作者
Guilbaud, Theophile [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Scemama, Ugo [3 ]
Sarran, Anthony [4 ]
Tribillon, Ecoline [1 ,2 ]
Nassar, Alexandra [1 ,2 ]
Gayet, Brice [1 ,2 ]
Fuks, David [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Mutualiste Montsouris, Dept Digest Oncol & Metab Surg, 42 Blvd Jourdan, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, 15 Rue Ecole Med, F-75005 Paris, France
[3] Hop Nord Marseille, APHM, Dept Imaging, Chemin Bourrely, F-13015 Marseille, France
[4] Inst Mutualiste Montsouris, Dept Radiol, 42 Blvd Jourdan, F-75014 Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris 05, Dept Digest Oncol & Metab Surg, Inst Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 Blvd Jourdan, F-75014 Paris, France
关键词
Tomography; Hepatectomy; Laparoscopy; Operative time; Hemorrhage; BILE LEAKAGE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; OPEN SURGERY; RISK-FACTORS; HEPATECTOMY; METASTASES; RECOMMENDATIONS; COMPLICATIONS; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-020-07734-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The surgical difficulty and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) are related to the size of the cut liver surface. This study assessed whether the estimated parenchymal transection surface area could predict intraoperative difficulty and postoperative outcomes. Methods LLRs performed between 2008 and 2018, for whom a preoperative CT scan was available for 3D review, were included in the study. The area of scheduled parenchymal transection was measured on the preoperative CT scan and cut-off values that could predict intraoperative difficulty were analyzed. Results 152 patients who underwent left lateral sectionectomy (n = 27, median estimated area 30.1 cm(2)[range 16.6-65.9]), left/right hepatectomy (n = 17 andn = 70, 76.8 cm(2)[range 43.9-150.9] and 72.2 cm(2)[range 39.4-124.9], respectively), right posterior sectionectomy (n = 7, 113.3 cm(2)[range 102.1-136.3]), central hepatectomy (n = 11, 109.1 cm(2)[range 66.1-186.1]) and extended left/right hepatectomy (n = 6 andn = 14, 115.3 cm(2)[range 92.9-128.9] and 50.7 cm(2)[range 13.3-74.9], respectively) were included. An estimated parenchymal transection surface area >= 100 cm(2)was associated with significant increase in operative time (AUC 0.81, 95% CI [0.70, 0.93],p < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (AUC 0.92, 95% CI [0.86, 0.97],p < 0.001), as well as a higher conversion rate (22.2% vs. 4.0%,p < 0.001). Overall (p = 0.017) and major morbidity (p = 0.003), biliary leakage (p < 0.001) and pulmonary complications (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with an estimated parenchymal transection surface area >= 100 cm(2). Conclusions An estimated parenchymal transection surface area >= 100 cm(2)is a relevant indicator of surgical difficulty and postoperative complications in LLR.
引用
收藏
页码:2942 / 2952
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of body mass index on postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic liver resection
    Nomi, Takeo
    Fuks, David
    Ferraz, Jean-Marc
    Kawaguchi, Yoshikuni
    Nakajima, Yoshiyuki
    Gayet, Brice
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (12): : 3647 - 3654
  • [22] A novel difficulty scoring system of laparoscopic liver resection for liver tumor
    Xi, Cheng
    Zhu, Maoqun
    Ji, Tianhao
    Tan, Yulin
    Zhuang, Lin
    Yuan, Zhiping
    Zhang, Zheng
    Xu, Litian
    Liu, Zhilin
    Xu, Xuezhong
    Xue, Wenbo
    Ding, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [23] Impact of intraoperative blood loss on the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection
    Gupta, Rahul
    Fuks, David
    Bourdeaux, Christophe
    Radkani, Pejman
    Nomi, Takeo
    Lamer, Christian
    Gayet, Brice
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (11): : 4451 - 4457
  • [24] Impact of intraoperative blood loss on the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection
    Rahul Gupta
    David Fuks
    Christophe Bourdeaux
    Pejman Radkani
    Takeo Nomi
    Christian Lamer
    Brice Gayet
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 4451 - 4457
  • [25] Does the difficulty grade of laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases correlate with long-term outcomes?
    Holowko, Waclaw
    Triantafyllidis, Ioannis
    Neuberg, Maud
    Tabchouri, Nicolas
    Beaussier, Marc
    Bennamoun, Mostefa
    Sarran, Anthony
    Lefevre, Marine
    Louvet, Christophe
    Gayet, Brice
    Fuks, David
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (09): : 1620 - 1627
  • [26] Comparison of IWATE, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, and Southampton Laparoscopic Liver Resection Difficulty Scoring Systems for Predicting Intra and Postoperative Outcomes in Robotic Hepatectomy
    Sucandy, Iswanto
    Ross, Sharona B.
    Flores, Jeilianis Adorno
    Syblis, Cameron
    Pattilachan, Tara Menon
    Christodoulou, Maria
    Rosemurgy, Alexander
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2024, : 1853 - 1859
  • [27] Intraoperative laparoscopic liver surface registration with preoperative CT usingmixing features and overlapping region masks
    Guan, Peidong
    Luo, Huoling
    Guo, Jianxi
    Zhang, Yanfang
    Jia, Fucang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2023, 18 (08) : 1521 - 1531
  • [28] INTRAOPERATIVE CT SCAN FINDINGS DURING RESECTION OF GLIAL TUMORS
    OKUDERA, H
    KYOSHIMA, K
    KOBAYASHI, S
    SUGITA, K
    NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1994, 16 (04) : 265 - 267
  • [29] The Southampton laparoscopic liver difficulty score: the development and validation of a multi-centre European difficulty score for laparoscopic liver resection
    Halls, Mark
    Cipriani, Federica
    Berardi, Giammauro
    Barkhatov, Leonid
    Lainas, Panagiotis
    D'Hondt, Mathieu
    Rotellar, Fernando
    Dagher, Ibrahim
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    Troisi, Roberto
    Edwin, Bjorn
    Abu Hilal, Mohammed
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 6 - 6
  • [30] The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection utilising a difficulty score
    Ivanecz, Arpad
    Plahuta, Irena
    Mencinger, Matej
    Perus, Iztok
    Magdalenic, Tomislav
    Turk, Spela
    Potrc, Stojan
    RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 56 (01) : 111 - 118