Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of Fluoxetine 20 mg capsules (Flutin and prozac) in healthy human volunteers

被引:1
|
作者
Najib, NM
Idkaidek, N
Beshtawi, M
Mohammed, B
Admour, I
Alam, SM
Dham, R
Qumaruzaman
机构
[1] Gulf Pharmaceut Ind, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[2] IPRC, Amman, Jordan
关键词
fluoxetine; bioequivalence; pharmacokinetics; LC-MS; Julphar;
D O I
10.1002/bdd.456
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
A bioequivalence study of two oral formulations of 20 mg fluoxetine was carried out in 24 healthy volunteers following a single dose, two-sequence, crossover randomized design at International Pharmaceutical Research Centre (IPRC), Amman, Jordan. The two formulations were Flutin capsules (Julphar, UAE) as test and Prozac capsules (Eli Lilly, UK) as reference product. Test and reference capsules were administered to each subject after an overnight fasting on two treatment days separated by a 28 day washout period. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 360 h. Plasma harvested from blood was analysed for fluoxetine by a sensitive, reproducible and accurate LC-MS method. Various pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC(0-t), AUC(0-t), C-max, T-max, T-1/2, and lambda(Z) were determined from plasma concentrations for both formulations and found to be in good agreement with reported values. AUC(0-t), AUC0-(proportional to) and C-max were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of data. No significant difference was found based on ANOVA; 90% confidence interval (94.60%-106.41% for AUC(0-t), 94.6%-108.14% for AUC(0-proportional to); 91.88%-103.65% for C-max) for test/reference ratio of these parameters were found within FDA acceptance range of 80%-125%. Based on these statistical inferences, it was concluded that Flutin is bioequivalent to Prozac and can be used interchangeably in medical practice. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 247
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bioequivalence evaluation of 320 mg gemifloxacin tablets in healthy volunteers
    Al-Mohizea, A. M.
    Kadi, A. A.
    Al-Bekairi, A. M.
    Al-Balla, S. A.
    Al-Yamani, M. J.
    Al-Khamis, K. I.
    Niazy, E. M.
    Ei-Sayed, Y. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 45 (11) : 617 - 622
  • [32] Bioequivalence evaluation of norfloxacin 400 mg tablets (Uroxin® and Noroxin®) in healthy human volunteers
    Al-Rashood, KA
    Al-Khamis, KI
    El-Sayed, YM
    Al-Bella, S
    Al-Yamani, MA
    Alam, SM
    Dham, R
    BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION, 2000, 21 (05) : 175 - 179
  • [33] Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics and Safety with Bioequivalence of Ibuprofen Sustained-Release Capsules of Two Formulations, in Chinese Healthy Volunteers: Bioequivalence Study
    Huang, Chunqi
    Yin, Zhou
    Yang, Yeqing
    Mo, Nan
    Yang, Hui
    Wang, Ying
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2023, 17 : 1881 - 1888
  • [34] Implication of enterohepatic re-circulation on single dose bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of clonidine hydrochloride tablets in healthy human volunteers
    Mehta, H. R.
    Patel, I. K.
    Patel, N. H.
    Patel, D. M.
    Parmar, A. B.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 71 (05) : 515 - 520
  • [35] Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of cefaclor 500 mg capsules: quantification of cefaclor using solid phase extraction technique
    Tutunji, M
    Jarrar, O
    Musameh, M
    Alam, SM
    Quamruzaman
    Dham, R
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 26 (02) : 149 - 153
  • [36] Bioequivalence evaluation of lomefloxacin 400 mg tablets (Lomax® versus Maxaquin®) in healthy human volunteers
    Al-Rashood, KA
    Al-Khamis, KI
    El-Sayed, YM
    Al-Bella, S
    Al-Yamani, MA
    Alam, SM
    Dham, R
    BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION, 1999, 20 (09) : 407 - 410
  • [37] Bioequivalence evaluation of cilostazol 50-mg tablets (Pletoze® and Steloz®) in healthy human volunteers
    Jain, S.
    Vadnerkar, G.
    Pareek, D.
    Jain, D.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 58 : A37 - A38
  • [38] Evaluation of bioequivalence of five 0.1 mg dutasteride capsules compared to one 0.5 mg dutasteride capsule: a randomized study in healthy male volunteers
    Fossler, Michael J.
    Collins, David A.
    Ino, Hiroko
    Sarai, Nobuaki
    Ravindranath, Ramiya
    Bowen, Chester L.
    Burns, Olivia
    JOURNAL OF DRUG ASSESSMENT, 2015, 4 (01) : 24 - 29
  • [39] Single and multiple dose bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of gliclazide modified release tablets in healthy Chinese male volunteers
    Ling, Guixia
    Sun, Jin
    Xu, Xiaodi
    Sun, Yinghua
    He, Zhonggui
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2006, 56 (09): : 626 - 630
  • [40] Bioequivalence assessment of Azomycin® (Julphar, UEA) as compared with Zithromax® (Pfizer, USA) -: Two brands of azithromycin -: In healthy human volunteers
    Najib, NM
    Idkaidek, N
    Ghanem, IE
    Admour, I
    Alam, SM
    Zaman, Q
    Dham, R
    BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION, 2001, 22 (01) : 15 - 21