Determination of volume of distribution using likelihood estimation in graphical analysis: Elimination of estimation bias

被引:42
|
作者
Parsey, RV
Ogden, RT
Mann, JJ
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York State Psychiat Inst, Dept Neurosci, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New York, NY 10032 USA
来源
关键词
modeling; kinetic; compartment; logan; serotonin;
D O I
10.1097/01.WCB.0000099460.85708.E1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The graphical analysis uses an ordinary least squares (OLS) fitting of transformed data to determine the total volume of distribution (V-T) and is not dependent upon a compartmental model configuration. This method, however, suffers from a noise-dependent bias. Approaches for reducing this bias include incorporating a presmoothing step, minimizing the squared perpendicular distance to the regression line, and conducting multilinear analysis. The solution proposed by Ogden, likelihood estimation in graphical analysis (LEGA), is an estimation technique in the original (nontransformed) domain based upon standard likelihood theory that incorporates the specific assumptions made on the noise inherent in the measurements. To determine the impact of this new method upon the noise-dependent bias, we compared V-T determinations by compartmental modeling, graphical analysis (GA), and LEGA in 36 regions of interest in dynamic PET data from 25 healthy volunteers injected with [C-11]-WAY-100635 and [C-11]-McN-5652, which are agents used to image the serotonin 1A receptor and serotonin transporter, respectively. As predicted by simulations, LEGA eliminates the noise-dependent bias associated with GA using OLS. This method is a valuable addition to the tools available for the quantification of radioligand binding data in PET and SPECT.
引用
收藏
页码:1471 / 1478
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Maximum likelihood estimation of the Weibull distribution with reduced bias
    Makalic, Enes
    Schmidt, Daniel F.
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2023, 33 (03)
  • [2] MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF PARAMETERS OF GAMMA DISTRIBUTION AND THEIR BIAS
    CHOI, SC
    WETTE, R
    TECHNOMETRICS, 1969, 11 (04) : 683 - &
  • [3] Maximum likelihood estimation of the Weibull distribution with reduced bias
    Enes Makalic
    Daniel F. Schmidt
    Statistics and Computing, 2023, 33 (3)
  • [4] Likelihood approach to parameter estimation in logan graphical analysis
    Ogden, RT
    Parsey, RV
    Mann, JJ
    NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 16 (03) : S73 - S73
  • [5] Empirical Bayesian estimation in graphical analysis: a voxel-based approach for the determination of the volume of distribution in PET studies
    Zanderigo, Francesca
    Ogden, R. Todd
    Bertoldo, Alessandra
    Cobelli, Claudio
    Mann, J. John
    Parsey, Ramin V.
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 37 (04) : 443 - 451
  • [6] Empirical bayesian estimation in graphical analysis: A voxel-based approach for the determination of the volume of distribution in PET studies
    Zanderigo, Francesca
    Ogden, R. T.
    Bertoldo, A.
    Cobelli, C.
    Mann, J. J.
    Parsey, R. V.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 41 : T86 - T86
  • [7] Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimation in exponentiated Teissier distribution
    Ahmed, Ahmed Abdulhadi
    Algamal, Zakariya Yahya
    Albalawi, Olayan
    FRONTIERS IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS, 2024, 10
  • [8] Bias Reduction of Maximum Likelihood Estimation in the Inverse Xgamma Distribution
    Ahmed, Ahmed Abdulhadi
    Algamal, Zakariya Yahya
    Albalawi, Olayan
    CONTEMPORARY MATHEMATICS, 2024, 5 (03): : 3174 - 3183
  • [9] Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimation for the beta distribution
    Cordeiro, GM
    DaRocha, EC
    DaRocha, JGC
    CribariNeto, F
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 1997, 58 (01) : 21 - 35
  • [10] Reducing bias of the maximum-likelihood estimation for the truncated Pareto distribution
    Zhang, Jin
    STATISTICS, 2013, 47 (04) : 792 - 799