Impact of coordinate rotation on eddy covariance fluxes at complex sites

被引:8
|
作者
Rannik, Ullar [1 ]
Vesala, Timo [1 ,2 ]
Peltola, Olli [3 ]
Novick, Kimberly A. [4 ]
Aurela, Mika [5 ]
Jarvi, Leena [1 ,6 ]
Montagnani, Leonardo [7 ,8 ]
Molder, Meelis [9 ]
Peichl, Matthias [10 ]
Pilegaard, Kim [11 ]
Mammarella, Ivan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Sci, Inst Atmospher & Earth Syst Res INAR Phys, POB 68, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Fac Agr & Forestry, Inst Atmospher & Earth Syst Res Forest Sci, POB 27, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[3] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Climate Res Programme, POB 503, Helsinki 00101, Finland
[4] Indiana Univ, ONeill Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, 702 N Walnut Grove Ave, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[5] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Helsinki, Fac Sci, Helsinki Inst Sustainabil Sci HELSUS, POB 68, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[7] Forest Serv, Via Brennero 6, Bolzano 39100, Italy
[8] Free Univ Bolzano, Fac Sci & Technol, Piazza Univ 5, Bolzano 39100, Italy
[9] Lund Univ, Dept Phys Geog & Ecosyst Sci, Solvegatan 12, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden
[10] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Ecol & Management, Skogsmarksgrand 17, Umea 90183, Sweden
[11] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm Engn, Lyngby 2800, Denmark
基金
芬兰科学院; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Coordinate rotation; Planar fit; Eddy covariance; Stability; Complex sites; VERTICAL ADVECTION; PART I; FOREST; CO2; EXCHANGE; LAYER; REEVALUATION; UNCERTAINTY; DIVERGENCE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107940
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The choice of coordinate system to calculate eddy covariance fluxes becomes particularly relevant at complex measurement sites. The traditional way is to perform double rotation (DR) of the coordinate system i.e., to calculate turbulent fluxes in a coordinate system that is aligned with the flow streamlines within the flux averaging period (e.g., kaimal and Finnigan, 1994). The second approach, the so-called planar-fitted (PF) co-ordinate system, averages the flow over a longer period of time, in practice a month or more. The PF method allows to derive an intercept coefficient of the vertical wind speed which can be attributed to the offset of the sonic anemometer or the average vertical flow related to meteorological conditions. We evaluated the variants of the PF methods using data from a variety of sites ranging from complex urban and forest sites to nearly ideal forest and peatland sites. At complex sites, we found that the intercept of the vertical wind speed derived from the PF method is a function of wind direction, time of day and/or stability. The sector-wise PF (SPF) method frequently led to insignificant statistical relationships. We tested a continuous PF (CPF) method where the relationship establishing the coordinate frame was represented as the continuous function in the form of Fourier series. The method enabled to obtain the PF with lower uncertainty as compared to the SPF method, by selecting necessary number of harmonics for each site based on confidence intervals of estimated parameters. Therefore, we recommend to use the CPF method in cases when the number of observations in some wind direction interval is low or the obtained SPF is insignificant due to large variance in measurements. We also showed that significant systematic difference can exist in cumulative turbulent fluxes between the DR and PF methods over a longer period of time. Derived vertical advection of carbon dioxide exhibited large variability with wind direction due to topography at complex sites and therefore, without considering horizontal advection, cannot be used to improve the net ecosystem exchange estimation during nocturnal, low turbulence conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Limitations of an Eddy-Covariance System in Measuring Low Ammonia Fluxes
    Ferrara, Rossana Monica
    Di Tommasi, Paul
    Famulari, Daniela
    Rana, Gianfranco
    [J]. BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2021, 180 (01) : 173 - 186
  • [32] Estimating surface fluxes using eddy covariance and numerical ogive optimization
    Sievers, J.
    Papakyriakou, T.
    Larsen, S. E.
    Jammet, M. M.
    Rysgaard, S.
    Sejr, M. K.
    Sorensen, L. L.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2015, 15 (04) : 2081 - 2103
  • [33] Limitations of an Eddy-Covariance System in Measuring Low Ammonia Fluxes
    Rossana Monica Ferrara
    Paul Di Tommasi
    Daniela Famulari
    Gianfranco Rana
    [J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2021, 180 : 173 - 186
  • [34] Comparison of ozone fluxes over grassland by gradient and eddy covariance technique
    Muller, Jennifer B. A.
    Coyle, Mhairi
    Fowler, David
    Gallagher, Martin W.
    Nemitz, Eiko G.
    Percival, Carl J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2009, 10 (03): : 164 - 169
  • [35] An Assessment of Coordinate Rotation Methods in Sonic Anemometer Measurements of Turbulent Fluxes over Complex Mountainous Terrain
    Golzio, Alessio
    Bollati, Irene Maria
    Ferrarese, Silvia
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (06)
  • [36] Measuring eddy covariance fluxes of ozone with a slow-response analyser
    Wohlfahrt, Georg
    Hoertnagl, Lukas
    Hammerle, Albin
    Graus, Martin
    Hansel, Armin
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (30) : 4570 - 4576
  • [37] Eddy-covariance measurements of nitrous oxide fluxes above a city
    Famulari, Daniela
    Nemitz, Elko
    Di Marco, Chiara
    Phillips, Gavin J.
    Thomas, Rick
    House, Emily
    Fowler, David
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2010, 150 (06) : 786 - 793
  • [38] COMPLEX COORDINATE ROTATION OF THE ELECTRON PROPAGATOR
    DONNELLY, RA
    SIMONS, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1980, 73 (06): : 2858 - 2866
  • [39] Potential evaporation at eddy-covariance sites across the globe
    Maes, Wouter H.
    Gentine, Pierre
    Verhoest, Niko E. C.
    Miralles, Diego G.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, 23 (02) : 925 - 948
  • [40] A Possible Reconciliation between Eddy Covariance Fluxes and Surface Energy Balance Closure
    Durand, Pierre
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (12)