Impact of coordinate rotation on eddy covariance fluxes at complex sites

被引:8
|
作者
Rannik, Ullar [1 ]
Vesala, Timo [1 ,2 ]
Peltola, Olli [3 ]
Novick, Kimberly A. [4 ]
Aurela, Mika [5 ]
Jarvi, Leena [1 ,6 ]
Montagnani, Leonardo [7 ,8 ]
Molder, Meelis [9 ]
Peichl, Matthias [10 ]
Pilegaard, Kim [11 ]
Mammarella, Ivan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Sci, Inst Atmospher & Earth Syst Res INAR Phys, POB 68, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Fac Agr & Forestry, Inst Atmospher & Earth Syst Res Forest Sci, POB 27, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[3] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Climate Res Programme, POB 503, Helsinki 00101, Finland
[4] Indiana Univ, ONeill Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, 702 N Walnut Grove Ave, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[5] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Helsinki, Fac Sci, Helsinki Inst Sustainabil Sci HELSUS, POB 68, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[7] Forest Serv, Via Brennero 6, Bolzano 39100, Italy
[8] Free Univ Bolzano, Fac Sci & Technol, Piazza Univ 5, Bolzano 39100, Italy
[9] Lund Univ, Dept Phys Geog & Ecosyst Sci, Solvegatan 12, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden
[10] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Ecol & Management, Skogsmarksgrand 17, Umea 90183, Sweden
[11] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm Engn, Lyngby 2800, Denmark
基金
芬兰科学院; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Coordinate rotation; Planar fit; Eddy covariance; Stability; Complex sites; VERTICAL ADVECTION; PART I; FOREST; CO2; EXCHANGE; LAYER; REEVALUATION; UNCERTAINTY; DIVERGENCE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107940
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The choice of coordinate system to calculate eddy covariance fluxes becomes particularly relevant at complex measurement sites. The traditional way is to perform double rotation (DR) of the coordinate system i.e., to calculate turbulent fluxes in a coordinate system that is aligned with the flow streamlines within the flux averaging period (e.g., kaimal and Finnigan, 1994). The second approach, the so-called planar-fitted (PF) co-ordinate system, averages the flow over a longer period of time, in practice a month or more. The PF method allows to derive an intercept coefficient of the vertical wind speed which can be attributed to the offset of the sonic anemometer or the average vertical flow related to meteorological conditions. We evaluated the variants of the PF methods using data from a variety of sites ranging from complex urban and forest sites to nearly ideal forest and peatland sites. At complex sites, we found that the intercept of the vertical wind speed derived from the PF method is a function of wind direction, time of day and/or stability. The sector-wise PF (SPF) method frequently led to insignificant statistical relationships. We tested a continuous PF (CPF) method where the relationship establishing the coordinate frame was represented as the continuous function in the form of Fourier series. The method enabled to obtain the PF with lower uncertainty as compared to the SPF method, by selecting necessary number of harmonics for each site based on confidence intervals of estimated parameters. Therefore, we recommend to use the CPF method in cases when the number of observations in some wind direction interval is low or the obtained SPF is insignificant due to large variance in measurements. We also showed that significant systematic difference can exist in cumulative turbulent fluxes between the DR and PF methods over a longer period of time. Derived vertical advection of carbon dioxide exhibited large variability with wind direction due to topography at complex sites and therefore, without considering horizontal advection, cannot be used to improve the net ecosystem exchange estimation during nocturnal, low turbulence conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On recursive partitioning to refine coordinate rotation in Eddy covariance applications
    Oetting, Joel
    Hicks, Bruce
    Eash, Neal
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2024, 346
  • [2] Uncertainty Analysis of the Eddy-Covariance Turbulent Fluxes Measured over a Heterogeneous Urban Area: A Coordinate Tilt Impact
    Lee, Doo-Il
    Lee, Jae-Hyeong
    Lee, Sang-Hyun
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE-KOREA, 2016, 26 (03): : 473 - 482
  • [3] Impact of filtering methods on ultrafine particles turbulent fluxes by eddy covariance
    Pappaccogli, Gianluca
    Famulari, Daniela
    Donateo, Antonio
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 285
  • [4] Eddy covariance measurement of isoprene fluxes
    Guenther, AB
    Hills, AJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D11) : 13145 - 13152
  • [5] Recurrence Analysis of Eddy Covariance Fluxes
    Flach, Milan
    Lange, Holger
    Foken, Thomas
    Hauhs, Michael
    [J]. RECURRENCE PLOTS AND THEIR QUANTIFICATIONS: EXPANDING HORIZONS, 2016, 180 : 301 - 319
  • [6] Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites
    Ziemblinska, Klaudia
    Urbaniak, Marek
    Dukat, Pauline
    Olejnik, Janusz
    [J]. JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2019, (148):
  • [7] The impact of averaging period on eddy fluxes observed at ChinaFLUX sites
    Sun, Xiao-Min
    Zhu, Zhi-Lin
    Wen, Xue-Fa
    Yuan, Guo-Fu
    Yu, Gui-Rui
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2006, 137 (3-4) : 188 - 193
  • [8] Ideas and perspectives: enhancing the impact of the FLUXNET network of eddy covariance sites
    Papale, Dario
    [J]. BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2020, 17 (22) : 5587 - 5598
  • [9] Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe: synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach
    Jung, Martin
    Schwalm, Christopher
    Migliavacca, Mirco
    Walther, Sophia
    Camps-Valls, Gustau
    Koirala, Sujan
    Anthoni, Peter
    Besnard, Simon
    Bodesheim, Paul
    Carvalhais, Nuno
    Chevallier, Frederic
    Gans, Fabian
    Goll, Daniel S.
    Haverd, Vanessa
    Kohler, Philipp
    Ichii, Kazuhito
    Jain, Atul K.
    Liu, Junzhi
    Lombardozzi, Danica
    Nabel, Julia E. M. S.
    Nelson, Jacob A.
    O'Sullivan, Michael
    Pallandt, Martijn
    Papale, Dario
    Peters, Wouter
    Pongratz, Julia
    Roedenbeck, Christian
    Sitch, Stephen
    Tramontana, Gianluca
    Walker, Anthony
    Weber, Ulrich
    Reichstein, Markus
    [J]. BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2020, 17 (05) : 1343 - 1365
  • [10] Eddy covariance measurements of turbulent fluxes in the surf zone
    Yongfeng Qi
    Xiaodong Shang
    Guiying Chen
    Linghui Yu
    [J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2020, 39 : 63 - 72