Relationship between moral distress and ethical climate with job satisfaction in nurses

被引:59
|
作者
Asgari, Sharareh [1 ]
Shafipour, Vida [1 ]
Taraghi, Zohreh [1 ]
Yazdani-Charati, Jamshid [1 ]
机构
[1] Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, Sari, Iran
关键词
Critical care; ethical climate; job satisfaction; moral distress; nursing; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EXPERIENCE; PERCEPTIONS; COMMITMENT; BURNOUT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0969733017712083
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Moral distress and ethical climate are important issues in the workplace that appear to affect people's quality of work life. Objectives: This study was conducted to determine the relationship of moral distress and ethical climate to job satisfaction in critical care nurses. Materials and methods: This descriptive-correlation study was conducted on 142 critical care nurses, selected from five social security hospitals in north Iran through census sampling. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, the Moral Distress Scale-Revised, the Olson's Hospital Ethical Climate Survey, and the Brayfield and Rothe Job Satisfaction index. Ethical considerations: The research project was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences and the Medical Deputy of the Social Security Organization. Findings: The mean scores obtained by the critical care nurses for moral distress, ethical climate, and job satisfaction were 87.02 +/- 44.56, 3.51 +/- 0.53, and 62.64 +/- 9.39, respectively. Although no significant relationships were observed between moral distress and job satisfaction, the relationship between ethical climate and job satisfaction was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Identifying ethical stressors in the workplace and giving proper feedback to the authorities to eliminate these factors and improve the ethical climate in these workplaces can help enhance job satisfaction in nurses and lead to higher quality care.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 356
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ethical climate, ethics stress, and the job satisfaction of nurses and social workers in the United States
    Ulrich, Connie
    O'Donnell, Patricia
    Taylor, Carol
    Farrar, Adrienne
    Danis, Marion
    Grady, Christine
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2007, 65 (08) : 1708 - 1719
  • [32] Collaboration, moral distress, and ethical climate in the ICU
    Cutugno, Christine
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2007, 107 (07) : 72AA - 72AA
  • [33] Beyond moral distress: Preserving the ethical integrity of nurses
    Woods, Martin
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2014, 21 (02) : 127 - 128
  • [34] The Ethical Significance of Moral Distress: Inequality and Nurses' Constraint-Distress
    Fourie, Carina
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2016, 16 (12): : 23 - 25
  • [35] Moral distress, moral resilience, and job embeddedness among pediatric nurses
    Li, Fuda
    Zhong, Jiayan
    He, Ziyuan
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2024, 31 (04) : 584 - 596
  • [36] An examination of the relationship between ethical work climate and moral awareness
    VanSandt, Craig V.
    Shepard, Jon M.
    Zappe, Stephen M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2006, 68 (04) : 409 - 432
  • [37] Relationship between ICU nurses' moral distress with burnout and anticipated turnover
    Shoorideh, Foroozan Atashzadeh
    Ashktorab, Tahereh
    Yaghmaei, Farideh
    Majd, Hamid Alavi
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2015, 22 (01) : 64 - 76
  • [38] An Examination of the Relationship Between Ethical Work Climate and Moral Awareness
    Craig V. VanSandt
    Jon M. Shepard
    Stephen M. Zappe
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2006, 68 : 409 - 432
  • [39] Ethical climate, moral resilience, and ethical competence of head nurses
    Yu, Qiang
    Huang, Chongmei
    Yan, Jin
    Yue, Liqing
    Tian, Yusheng
    Yang, Jiaxin
    Li, Xuting
    Li, Yamin
    Qin, Yuelan
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2024,
  • [40] Nurses' job satisfaction as a mediator of the relationship between organizational commitment components and job performance
    Dinc, M. Sait
    Kuzey, Cemil
    Steta, Nejra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORKPLACE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, 2018, 33 (02) : 75 - 95