The lessons of People V. Moscat:: Confronting judicial bias in domestic violence cases interpreting Crawford V. Washington

被引：0

|

作者：

Jaros, D

机构：

来源：

AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW | 2005年 / 42卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：995 / 1009

页数：15

相关论文

共 35 条

[21] A more reliable right to present a defense:: The compulsory process clause after Crawford v. Washington
Hewett, Martin A.
GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL, 2007, 96 (01) : 273 - 315
[22] WHAT REMAINS OF THE "FORFEITED" RIGHT TO CONFRONTATION? RESTORING SIXTH AMENDMENT VALUES TO THE FORFEITURE-BY-WRONGDOING RULE IN LIGHT OF CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON AND GILES V. CALIFORNIA
Talbott, Rebecca Sims
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2010, 85 (04) : 1291 - 1345
[23] Repercussions of Crawford v. Washington: A child's statement to,a washington state child protective services worker may be inadmissible
McKimmie, HL
WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 2005, 80 (01) : 219 - 243
[24] Pipe-Dreams of Truth and Fairness: Is Crawford v. Washington a Breakthrough for Sixth Amendment Confrontation Rights?
Walther, Susanne C.
NEW CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW, 2006, 9 (02): : 453 - 474
[25] Playing by all the rules:: How to define and provide a "prior opportunity for cross-examination" in child sexual abuse cases after Crawford v. Washington
Carr, Prudence Beidler
JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY, 2007, 97 (02): : 631 - 664
[26] Testimonial hearsay as the basis for expert opinion:: The intersection of the confrontation clause and federal rule of evidence 703 after Crawford v. Washington
Oliver, RA
HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL, 2004, 55 (06) : 1539 - +
[27] Shield or sieve?: People v. Bryant and the rape shield law in high-profile cases
Haddad, RI
COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 2005, 39 (02): : 185 - 221
[28] Domestic Missionaries, Slaveholders, and Confronting the Morality of Slavery: Missouri v. James Burr, George Thompson, and Alanson Work, September, 1841
Prinsloo, Oleta
SOCIAL SCIENCES AND MISSIONS-SCIENCES SOCIALES ET MISSIONS, 2013, 26 (01): : 59 - 92
[29] WILL NONCUSTODIAL PARENTS WHO ARE REFUSED VISITATION WITH CHILDREN ALSO BE TURNED AWAY FROM US COURTS?: JUDICIAL REMEDIES IN ACCESS CASES UNDER THE HAGUE CONVENTION IN CANTOR V. COHEN AND OZALTIN V. OZALTIN
Thompson, Melissa L.
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI LAW REVIEW, 2014, 82 (03) : 1005 - 1027
[30] Cognitive-behavioural therapy v. social activity therapy for people with psychosis and a history of violence: randomised controlled trial
Haddock, Gillian
Barrowclough, Christine
Shaw, Jennifer J.
Dunn, Graham
Novaco, Raymond W.
Tarrier, Nicholas
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 194 (02) : 152 - 157

← 1 2 3 4 →