Durability and survival are similar after elective endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in younger patients

被引:31
|
作者
Lee, Kevin [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Elaine [1 ,2 ]
Dubois, Luc [1 ,2 ]
Power, Adam H. [1 ,2 ]
DeRose, Guy [1 ,2 ]
Forbes, Thomas L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] London Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Vasc Surg, London, England
[2] Univ Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
关键词
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DIAMETER; EUROSTAR; EVAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.012
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The role of endovascular repair (EVAR) of aortic aneurysms in young patients is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes and reintervention rates in patients 60 years of age or younger who underwent elective open or endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected vascular surgery database at a university-affiliated medical center was performed to identify all patients who underwent elective repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm between 2000 and 2013 and were 60 years of age or younger at the time of the repair. Preoperative anatomic measurements were performed and compared with instructions for use (IFU) criteria for the endografts. Results: The study cohort comprised 169 patients 60 years of age or younger (mean age, 56.7 +/- 2.8 years) who underwent elective repair (119 open repair, 50 EVAR). Patients treated with open repair and EVAR had similar comorbidities, except that EVAR patients were more likely to have hypertension (P = .03) and poor left ventricular function (P = .04). The open repair group had significantly larger suprarenal (P = .004) and infrarenal (P = .005) neck angles, shorter neck lengths (P < .001), and larger maximum aneurysm diameter (P = .02) compared with the EVAR group. Only five patients (13%) in the EVAR group did not meet all IFU criteria. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 1.8% (0% EVAR, 2.5% open repair; P = .56). Overall mean life expectancy was 11.5 years (9.8 years EVAR, 11.9 years open repair; P = .09). The 1-year (98% EVAR, 96% open repair), 5-year (86% EVAR, 88% open repair), and 10-year (54% EVAR, 75% open repair) survival did not differ between EVAR and open repair (P = .16). Long-term survival (78% EVAR, 85% open repair; P = .09) and reintervention rates (12% EVAR, 16% open repair; P = .80) did not differ. No late aneurysm rupture or aneurysm-related deaths were observed. The most common causes of long-term mortality were malignant disease and cardiovascular events. Reinterventions in the open repair group were exclusively laparotomy related (incisional hernia repairs), whereas all reinterventions in the EVAR group were aortic related, including one conversion to open repair. Conclusions: After elective aneurysm repair, younger patients have a moderate life expectancy related to malignant disease and cardiovascular health. EVAR offers durability and long-term survival similar to those with open repair in these younger patients as long as aneurysm anatomy and IFU are adhered to.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 641
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long-term survival and secondary procedures after open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    van Schaik, Theodorus G.
    Yeung, Kak K.
    Verhagen, Hence J.
    de Bruin, Jorg L.
    van Sambeek, Marc R. H. M.
    Balm, Ron
    Zeebregts, Clark J.
    van Herwaarden, Joost A.
    Blankensteijn, Jan D.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 66 (05) : 1379 - 1389
  • [22] Predictors of renal dysfunction after endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Zettervall, Sara L.
    Ultee, Klaas H. J.
    Soden, Peter A.
    Deery, Sarah E.
    Shean, Katie E.
    Pothof, Alexander B.
    Wyers, Mark
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (04) : 991 - 996
  • [23] Late outcomes after endovascular and open repair of large abdominal aortic aneurysms
    de Guerre, Livia E. V. M.
    Dansey, Kirsten
    Li, Chun
    Lu, Jinny
    Patel, Priya B.
    van Herwaarden, Joost A.
    Jones, Douglas W.
    Goodney, Philip P.
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 (04) : 1152 - 1160
  • [24] Younger is Better for Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair, but ...
    De Rango, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 43 (05) : 513 - 514
  • [25] Predictors for outcome after open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Acosta, S.
    Lindblad, B.
    Zdanowski, Z.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 33 (03) : 277 - 284
  • [26] Factors Impacting Survival After Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Mehta, Manish
    Roddy, Sean P.
    Paty, Philip S. K.
    Kreienberg, Paul B.
    Ozsvath, Kathleen J.
    Sternbach, Yaron
    Taggert, John B.
    Chang, Benjamin B.
    Darling, R. Clement, III
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 54 (03) : 920 - 920
  • [27] Worse late-phase survival after elective endovascular than open surgical repair for intact abdominal aortic aneurysms: The devil is in the detail
    Paraskevas, Kosmas I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 234 : 133 - 133
  • [28] Similar Outcomes of Open and Endovascular Repair for Complex Aortic Aneurysms
    Lancaster, Robert T.
    Ergul, Emel A.
    Buck, Dominique B.
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    Schanzer, Andres
    Conrad, Mark F.
    Cambria, Richard P.
    Patel, Virendra I.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 62 (04) : 1101 - 1102
  • [29] Blood product requirements in patients undergoing elective endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Walker, SR
    Yusuf, SW
    Braithwaite, BB
    Lonsdale, R
    Wenham, PW
    Hopkinson, BR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 85 : 163 - 163
  • [30] Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Does Not Improve Survival versus Open Repair in Patients Sixty Years or Younger
    Gupta, Prateek K.
    Natarajan, Bala
    Fang, Xiang
    Balters, Marcus
    Johanning, Jason M.
    Lynch, Thomas G.
    Longo, Gernon M.
    MacTaggart, Jason N.
    Pipinos, Iraklis I.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 54 (05) : 1540 - 1540