Group prenatal care

被引:54
|
作者
Mazzoni, Sara E. [1 ,2 ]
Carter, Ebony B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Womens Reprod Healthcare, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
CenteringPregnancy; group prenatal care; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CENTERING PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE COHORT; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; WOMEN; MODEL; IMPLEMENTATION; ADOLESCENTS; PERCEPTIONS; MILITARY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Patients participating in group prenatal care gather together with women of similar gestational ages and 2 providers who cofacilitate an educational session after a brief medical assessment. The model was first described in the 1990s by a midwife for low-risk patients and is now practiced by midwives and physicians for both low-risk patients and some high-risk patients, such as those with diabetes. The majority of literature on group prenatal care uses CenteringPregnancy, the most popular model. The first randomized controlled trial of CenteringPregnancy showed that it reduced the risk of preterm birth in low-risk women. However, recent meta-analyses have shown similar rates of preterm birth, low birthweight, and neonatal intensive care unit admission between women participating in group prenatal care and individual prenatal care. There may be subgroups, such as African Americans, who benefit from this type of prenatal care with significantly lower rates of preterm birth. Group prenatal care seems to result in increased patient satisfaction and knowledge and use of postpartum family planning as well as improved weight gain parameters. The literature is inconclusive regarding breast-feeding, stress, depression, and positive health behaviors, although it is theorized that group prenatal care positively affects these outcomes. It is unclear whether group prenatal care results in cost savings, although it may in large-volume practices if each group consists of approximately 8-10 women. Group prenatal care requires a significant paradigm shift. It can be difficult to implement and sustain. More randomized trials are needed to ascertain the true benefits of the model, best practices for implementation, and subgroups who may benefit most from this innovative way to provide prenatal care. In short, group prenatal care is an innovative and promising model with comparable pregnancy outcomes to individual prenatal care in the general population and improved outcomes in some demographic groups.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:552 / 556
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Group Prenatal Care Attendance: Determinants and Relationship with Care Satisfaction
    Cunningham, Shayna D.
    Grilo, Stephanie
    Lewis, Jessica B.
    Novick, Gina
    Rising, Sharon Schindler
    Tobin, Jonathan N.
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2017, 21 (04) : 770 - 776
  • [22] WOMEN'S EXPERIENCE OF GROUP PRENATAL CARE
    Novick, Gina
    Sadler, Lois S.
    Kennedy, Holly Powell
    Cohen, Sally S.
    Groce, Nora E.
    Knafl, Kathleen A.
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2010, 55 (05) : 481 - 481
  • [23] Group Multimodal Prenatal Care and Postpartum Outcomes
    Avalos, Lyndsay A.
    Oberman, Nina
    Gomez, Lizeth
    Quesenberry, Charles P.
    Sinclair, Fiona
    Kurtovich, Elaine
    Gunderson, Erica P.
    Hedderson, Monique M.
    Stark, Joanna
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (05) : E2412280
  • [24] Women's Experience of Group Prenatal Care
    Novick, Gina
    Sadler, Lois S.
    Kennedy, Holly Powell
    Cohen, Sally S.
    Groce, Nora E.
    Knafl, Kathleen A.
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2011, 21 (01) : 97 - 116
  • [25] Effects of Group Prenatal Care on Food Insecurity
    Heberlein, Emily
    Frongillo, Edward
    Picklesimer, Amy
    Covington-Kolb, Sarah
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2015, 29
  • [26] Group prenatal care: effectiveness and challenges to implementation
    Andrade-Romo, Zafiro
    Heredia-Pi, Ileana B.
    Fuentes-Rivera, Evelyn
    Alcalde-Rabanal, Jacqueline
    Bolanos Cacho, Lourdes Bravo
    Jurkiewicz, Laurie
    Darney, Blair G.
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2019, 53 : 85
  • [27] Group Prenatal Care Attendance: Determinants and Relationship with Care Satisfaction
    Shayna D. Cunningham
    Stephanie Grilo
    Jessica B. Lewis
    Gina Novick
    Sharon Schindler Rising
    Jonathan N. Tobin
    Jeannette R. Ickovics
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2017, 21 : 770 - 776
  • [28] OUTCOMES OF LATINA WOMEN IN CENTERINGPREGNANCY GROUP PRENATAL CARE COMPARED WITH INDIVIDUAL PRENATAL CARE Reply
    Trudnak, Tara
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 59 (01) : 106 - 106
  • [29] Group Prenatal Care Versus Individual Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
    Ruiz-Mirazo, Eider
    Lopez-Yarto, Maite
    McDonald, Sarah D.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2012, 34 (03) : 223 - 229
  • [30] Does Group Prenatal Care Affect Satisfaction And Prenatal Care Utilization in Iranian Pregnant Women?
    Jafari, F.
    Eftekhar, H.
    Mohammad, K.
    Fotouhi, A.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 39 (02) : 52 - 62