An inter-comparison of soil moisture data products from satellite remote sensing and a land surface model

被引:62
|
作者
Fang, Li [1 ,2 ]
Hain, Christopher R. [1 ,2 ]
Zhan, Xiwu [2 ]
Anderson, Martha C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Earth Syst Sci Interdisciplinary Ctr, 5825 Univ Res Court, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[2] NOAA, NESDIS, STAR, 5830 Univ Res Court, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[3] ARS, USDA, Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, 104 Bldg 007,BARC West, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
Soil moisture product; Validation; Active and passive microwave; Thermal infrared remote sensing; FRACTIONAL VEGETATION COVER; DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM; INFORMATION-SYSTEM; ENERGY FLUXES; SENSED DATA; PART I; RETRIEVAL; TEMPERATURE; ASCAT; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jag.2015.10.006
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Significant advances have been achieved in generating soil moisture (SM) products from satellite remote sensing and/or land surface modeling with reasonably good accuracy in recent years. However, the discrepancies among the different SM data products can be considerably large, which hampers their usage in various applications. The bias of one SM product from another is well recognized in the literature. Bias estimation and spatial correction methods have been documented for assimilating satellite SM product into land surface and hydrologic models. Nevertheless, understanding the characteristics of each of these SM data products is required for many applications where the most accurate data products are desirable. This study inter-compares five SM data products from three different sources with each other, and evaluates them against in situ SM measurements over 14-year period from 2000 to 2013. Specifically, three microwave (MW) satellite based data sets provided by ESA's Climate Change Initiative (CCI) (CCI-merged, -active and -passive products), one thermal infrared (TIR) satellite based product (ALEXI), and the Noah land surface model (LSM) simulations. The in-situ SM measurements are collected from the North American Soil Moisture Database (NASMD), which involves more than 600 ground sites from a variety of networks. They are used to evaluate the accuracies of these five SM data products. In general, each of the five SM products is capable of capturing the dry/wet patterns over the study period. However, the absolute SM values among the five products vary significantly. SM simulations from Noah LSM are more stable relative to the satellite-based products. All TIR and MW satellite based products are relatively noisier than the Noah LSM simulations. Even though MW satellite based SM retrievals have been predominantly used in the past years, SM retrievals of the ALEXI model based on TIR satellite observations demonstrate skills equivalent to all the MW satellite retrievals and even slightly better over certain regions. Compared to the individual active and passive MW products, the merged CCI product exhibits higher anomaly correlation with both Noah LSM simulations and in-situ SM measurements. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 50
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Monitoring Soil Moisture Change in North Africa with Using Satellite Remote Sensing and Land Data Assimilaiton System
    Lu, Hui
    Koike, Toshio
    Fujii, Hideyuki
    Ohta, Tetsu
    Tamagawa, Katsunori
    [J]. 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 1223 - 1226
  • [32] The Texas Soil Observation Network: A Comprehensive Soil Moisture Dataset for Remote Sensing and Land Surface Model Validation
    Caldwell, Todd G.
    Bongiovanni, Tara
    Cosh, Michael H.
    Jackson, Thomas J.
    Colliander, Andreas
    Abolt, Charles J.
    Casteel, Richard
    Larson, Toti
    Scanlon, Bridget R.
    Young, Michael H.
    [J]. VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2019, 18 (01)
  • [33] Non-parametric Methods for Soil Moisture Retrieval from Satellite Remote Sensing Data
    Lakhankar, Tarendra
    Ghedira, Hosni
    Temimi, Marouane
    Sengupta, Manajit
    Khanbilvardi, Reza
    Blake, Reginald
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 1 (01) : 3 - 21
  • [34] Assessment and inter-comparison of recently developed/reprocessed microwave satellite soil moisture products using ISMN ground-based measurements
    Al-Yaari, A.
    Wigneron, J. -P.
    Dorigo, W.
    Colliander, A.
    Pellarin, T.
    Hahn, S.
    Mialon, A.
    Richaume, P.
    Fernandez-Moran, R.
    Fan, L.
    Kerr, Y. H.
    De Lannoy, G.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 224 : 289 - 303
  • [35] Accuracy issues associated with satellite remote sensing soil moisture data and their assimilation
    Zhan, Xiwu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SPATIAL ACCURACY ASSESSMENT IN NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, VOL I: SPATIAL UNCERTAINTY, 2008, : 213 - 220
  • [36] ESTIMATING SOIL MOISTURE USING OPTICAL AND RADAR SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING DATA
    Natali, Stefano
    Pellegrini, Loreto
    Rossi, Gianluigi
    Giordano, Ludovica
    Iannetta, Massimo
    Schino, Gabriele
    Marini, Alberto
    Nabil, Gasmi
    [J]. DESERTIFICATION AND RISK ANALYSIS USING HIGH AND MEDIUM RESOLUTION SATELLITE DATA, 2009, : 105 - +
  • [37] Improvement of land surface model simulations over India via data assimilation of satellite-based soil moisture products
    Nair, Akhilesh S.
    Indu, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 573 : 406 - 421
  • [38] Satellite Remote Sensing of Snow Depth on Antarctic Sea Ice: An Inter-Comparison of Two Empirical Approaches
    Kern, Stefan
    Ozsoy-Cicek, Burcu
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (06):
  • [39] Surface soil moisture retrievals from remote sensing: Current status, products & future trends
    Petropoulos, George P.
    Ireland, Gareth
    Barrett, Brian
    [J]. PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2015, 83-84 : 36 - 56
  • [40] A global analysis of soil moisture derived from satellite observations and a land surface model
    Rebel, K. T.
    de Jeu, R. A. M.
    Ciais, P.
    Viovy, N.
    Piao, S. L.
    Kiely, G.
    Dolman, A. J.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (03) : 833 - 847