Using Adversarial Images to Assess the Robustness of Deep Learning Models Trained on Diagnostic Images in Oncology

被引:18
|
作者
Joel, Marina Z. [1 ]
Umrao, Sachin [1 ]
Chang, Enoch [1 ]
Choi, Rachel [1 ]
Yang, Daniel X. [1 ]
Duncan, James S. [2 ]
Omuro, Antonio [3 ]
Herbst, Roy [4 ]
Krumholz, Harlan M. [4 ,5 ]
Aneja, Sanjay [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Therapeut Radiol, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Sch Med, Dept Neurol, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Dept Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale CORE, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, New Haven, CT USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1200/CCI.21.00170
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Deep learning (DL) models have rapidly become a popular and cost-effective tool for image classification within oncology. A major limitation of DL models is their vulnerability to adversarial images, manipulated input images designed to cause misclassifications by DL models. The purpose of the study is to investigate the robustness of DL models trained on diagnostic images using adversarial images and explore the utility of an iterative adversarial training approach to improve the robustness of DL models against adversarial images. METHODS We examined the impact of adversarial images on the classification accuracies of DL models trained to classify cancerous lesions across three common oncologic imaging modalities. The computed tomography (CT) model was trained to classify malignant lung nodules. The mammogram model was trained to classify malignant breast lesions. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) model was trained to classify brain metastases. RESULTS Oncologic images showed instability to small pixel-level changes. A pixel-level perturbation of 0.004 (for pixels normalized to the range between 0 and 1) resulted in most oncologic images to be misclassified (CT 25.6%, mammogram 23.9%, and MRI 6.4% accuracy). Adversarial training improved the stability and robustness of DL models trained on oncologic images compared with naive models ([CT 67.7% v 26.9%], mammogram [63.4% vs 27.7%], and MRI [87.2% vs 24.3%]). CONCLUSION DL models naively trained on oncologic images exhibited dramatic instability to small pixel-level changes resulting in substantial decreases in accuracy. Adversarial training techniques improved the stability and robustness of DL models to such pixel-level changes. Before clinical implementation, adversarial training should be considered to proposed DL models to improve overall performance and safety. (C) 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy Images by Using Deep Learning Models
    Dutta, Suvajit
    Manideep, Bonthala C. S.
    Basha, Syed Muzamil
    Caytiles, Ronnie D.
    Iyengar, N. Ch. S. N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GRID AND DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, 2018, 11 (01): : 89 - 106
  • [22] Exploring adversarial image attacks on deep learning models in oncology
    Joel, Marina
    Umrao, Sachin
    Chang, Enoch
    Choi, Rachel
    Yang, Daniel
    Gilson, Aidan
    Herbst, Roy
    Krumholz, Harlan
    Aneja, Sanjay
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 27 (05)
  • [23] Prediction of surface reflectance using a deep learning model trained on synthetic surface images
    Yoo, Jeonghyun
    Ki, Hyungson
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 133
  • [24] ADVRET: An Adversarial Robustness Evaluating and Testing Platform for Deep Learning Models
    Ren, Fei
    Yang, Yonghui
    Hu, Chi
    Zhou, Yuyao
    Ma, Siyou
    [J]. 2021 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE QUALITY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY COMPANION (QRS-C 2021), 2021, : 9 - 14
  • [25] Manipulation and generation of synthetic satellite images using deep learning models
    Abady, Lydia
    Horvath, Janos
    Tondi, Benedetta
    Delp, Edward J.
    Barni, Mauro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 16 (04)
  • [26] Perithecia Detection from Images of Stubble using Deep Learning Models
    Azimi, Hilda
    Xi, Pengcheng
    Cuperlovic-Culf, Miroslava
    Vaughan, Martha Marie
    [J]. 2021 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (IEEE SSCI 2021), 2021,
  • [27] Crane pose estimation using deep learning models and synthetic images
    Park G.
    Hong H.
    Jeong H.
    Kang H.
    Won M.
    [J]. Journal of Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems, 2021, 27 (04) : 312 - 319
  • [28] Stenosis detection in coronary angiography images using deep learning models
    Luque-Baena, Rafael M.
    Granados, Irene Romero
    Jimenez-Partinen, Ariadna
    Palomo, Esteban J.
    Jimenez-Navarro, Manuel
    [J]. 2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METROLOGY FOR EXTENDED REALITY, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEURAL ENGINEERING (METROXRAINE), 2022, : 22 - 27
  • [29] Predictive Deep Learning Models for Malaria Using Cell Images Dataset
    Haruna, Ahmed Abba
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2022, 22 (09): : 680 - 686
  • [30] Learning to Distort Images Using Generative Adversarial Networks
    Chen, Li-Heng
    Bampis, Christos G.
    Li, Zhi
    Bovik, Alan C.
    [J]. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2020, 27 : 2144 - 2148