Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) pod and rhizosphere harbored different bacterial communities

被引:5
|
作者
Xu, Wen-yue [1 ]
Wang, Mei-Ling [1 ]
Sun, Xiao-Xiao [1 ]
Shu, Chang-Long [1 ]
Zhang, Jie [1 ]
Geng, Li-Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Plant Protect, State Key Lab Biol Plant Dis & Insect Pests, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
来源
RHIZOSPHERE | 2021年 / 19卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Peanut; Seed germination; Geocarposphere; Rhizosphere; Bacterial communities; GROWTH PROMOTION; GEOCARPOSPHERE; PLANTS; PGPR;
D O I
10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100373
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Peanut is an important oil crop in the world. A full understanding of the rhizosphere and peanut pods bacterial communities and function are still lacking. In this study, we found the bacterial collections isolated from the peanut pods promoted the germination of peanut seeds. The bacteria community around rhizosphere and pods of peanut were further analyzed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. The bacteria community around the pods was highly diversified and significantly different from that of the rhizosphere. Almost all the phyla and 174 of the genera contributed to the difference. Among the top four phyla, the abundance of Acidobacteria was higher in the geocarposphere, while the abundance of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were higher in the rhizosphere. The top two genera, Dyella and Burkholderia, were more abundant in the rhizosphere than in the geocarposphere. The core microbiome around pods consisted of more operational taxonomic units (OTUs) than the rhizosphere microbiome, and harbored a more complex co-occurrence network. In order to obtain functional microorganisms, 7 OTUs with greater degree centrality were selected through the co-occurrence network. An Arthrobacter isolate was found to significantly increase the seed germination rates. The differences in the bacterial community between the pods and rhizosphere of peanut provided an efficient method to exploring beneficial bacterial resources for yield enhancement.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A new method to analyse the phenolic acids in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) rhizosphere soil
    Li, Q. S.
    Jia, X. L.
    Ye, J. H.
    Li, J. J.
    Luo, X. M.
    Lin, W. X.
    [J]. ALLELOPATHY JOURNAL, 2019, 48 (02): : 217 - 226
  • [12] Assessment of active bacteria metabolizing phenolic acids in the peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) rhizosphere
    Liu, Jinguang
    Wang, Xingxiang
    Zhang, Taolin
    Li, Xiaogang
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 205 : 118 - 124
  • [13] Boron mobility in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Sawika Konsaeng
    Bernard Dell
    Benjavan Rerkasem
    [J]. Plant and Soil, 2010, 330 : 281 - 289
  • [14] Boron mobility in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Konsaeng, Sawika
    Dell, Bernard
    Rerkasem, Benjavan
    [J]. PLANT AND SOIL, 2010, 330 (1-2) : 281 - 289
  • [16] Silica nanoparticles conferring resistance to bacterial wilt in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Deng, Quanqing
    Huang, Suihua
    Liu, Hao
    Lu, Qing
    Du, Puxuan
    Li, Haifen
    Li, Shaoxiong
    Liu, Haiyan
    Wang, Runfeng
    Huang, Lu
    Sun, Dayuan
    Wu, Yahui
    Chen, Xiaoping
    Hong, Yanbin
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 915
  • [17] QUANTIFICATION OF THE GEOCARPOSPHERE AND RHIZOSPHERE EFFECT OF PEANUT (ARACHIS-HYPOGAEA L)
    KLOEPPER, JW
    BOWEN, KL
    [J]. PLANT AND SOIL, 1991, 136 (01) : 103 - 109
  • [18] Effect of waterlogging stress on grain nutritional quality and pod yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Zeng, Ruier
    Chen, Tingting
    Zhang, Hui
    Cao, Jing
    Li, Xi
    Wang, Xinyue
    Wang, Ying
    Yao, Suzhe
    Gao, Yu
    Chen, Yong
    Zhang, Lei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2023, 209 (02) : 286 - 299
  • [19] Identification and Genetic Evaluation of a New Source of Pod Wart Resistance for Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Fraiman-Meir, Deena
    Hedvat, Ilan
    Kayam, Galya
    Hovav, Ran
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2017, 57 (02) : 617 - 625
  • [20] Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L)
    Stalker, HT
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1997, 53 (1-3) : 205 - 217