Exclusive dealing and business efficiency: Evidence from industry practice

被引:39
|
作者
Heide, JB [1 ]
Dutta, S
Bergen, M
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS | 1998年 / 41卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1086/467394
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Exclusive dealing has been the subject of intense public policy debate. A central issue in this debate has been the relationship between exclusive dealing and business efficiency. Despite its importance, there has been a general lack of empirical evidence on business efficiency arguments. The existing evidence on exclusive dealing is limited almost entirely to legal case studies involving firms whose distribution practices have been challenged under antitrust law. in this article we use a new source of microlevel data to study the use of exclusive dealing in industrial markets, gathered through a survey of managers who were responsible for making the distribution decisions in their firms. Our central finding is that business efficiency factors play a significant role in firms' decisions regarding exclusive dealing. Specifically, we find evidence that firms are more likely to use exclusive dealing when there is a potential that other manufacturers can free ride on the services they provide. We also find that difficulties with evaluating distributors' adherence to assigned restrictions decrease the likelihood of using exclusive dealing in the first place. Finally, we also find that when manufacturers are concerned about the costs that exclusive dealing imposes on end customers, such arrangements are less likely.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 407
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Business Strategy and CEO Compensation: Evidence from the Hospitality and Tourism Industry
    Kim, Hye Seok
    Akindayomi, Akinloye
    Chung, Chune Young
    Ogunmakin, Adeduro Adesola
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2024, 53 (01) : 87 - 119
  • [42] Business Location Decisions in the Medical Device Industry: Evidence From Massachusetts
    Kimelberg, Shelley McDonough
    Nicoll, Lauren A.
    [J]. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2012, 26 (01) : 34 - 49
  • [43] Relational paths in business network dynamics: Evidence from the fashion industry
    Guercini, Simone
    Runfola, Andrea
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2012, 41 (05) : 807 - 815
  • [44] Productivity and Business Cycles in Japan: Evidence From Japanese Industry Data
    T. Miyagawa
    Y. Sakuragawa
    M. Takizawa
    [J]. The Japanese Economic Review, 2006, 57 : 161 - 186
  • [45] Political connectedness and business performance: evidence from Turkish industry rankings
    Ozcan, Gul Berna
    Gunduz, Umut
    [J]. BUSINESS AND POLITICS, 2015, 17 (01) : 41 - 73
  • [46] Digital transformation of business ecosystems: Evidence from the Korean pop industry
    Tan, Felix T. C.
    Ondrus, Jan
    Tan, Barney
    Oh, Jungsuk
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2020, 30 (05) : 866 - 898
  • [47] Price Dispersion Over the Business Cycle: Evidence from the Airline Industry
    Cornia, Marco
    Gerardi, Kristopher S.
    Shapiro, Adam Hale
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 60 (03): : 347 - 373
  • [48] Cluster and business performance: Historical evidence from the Portuguese cork industry
    Branco, Amelia
    Lopes, Joao Carlos
    [J]. INVESTIGACIONES DE HISTORIA ECONOMICA, 2018, 14 (01): : 43 - 53
  • [49] Industry-Specific Human Capital and Wages: Evidence from the Business Process Outsourcing Industry
    Kim, Keongtae
    Mithas, Sunil
    Whitaker, Jonathan
    Roy, Prasanto K.
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (03) : 618 - 638
  • [50] Impact of mandated exclusive territories in the US brewing industry: Evidence from scanner level data
    Burgdorf, Jacob
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2019, 63 : 376 - 416