Genetic screening for susceptibility to depression: can we and should we?

被引:13
|
作者
Morley, KI [1 ]
Hall, WD [1 ]
Carter, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Inst Mol Biosci, Off Publ Policy & Eth, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
关键词
depression; ethics; genetic screening; genetics;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1614.2004.01300.x
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: To summarize current knowledge about genetic susceptibility to mood disorders and examine ethical and policy issues that will need to be addressed if robustly replicated susceptibility alleles lead to proposals to screen and intervene with persons at increased genetic risk of developing mood disorders. Method: Empirical studies and reviews of the genetics of unipolar and bipolar depression were collected via MEDLINE and psycINFO database searches. Results: A number of candidate genes for depression have been identified, each of which increases the risk of mood disorders two- or threefold. None of the associations between these alleles and mood disorders have been consistently reported to date. Conclusions: Screening the population for genetic susceptibility to mood disorders is unlikely to be a practically useful policy (given plausible assumptions). Until there are effective treatments for persons at increased risk, screening is arguably unethical. Screening within affected families to advise on risks of developing depression would entail screening children and adolescents, raising potentially serious ethical issues of consent and stigmatization. Genetic research on depression should continue under appropriate ethical guidelines that protect the interests of research participants.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 80
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] teaching frameworks for participation - can we? should we?
    Kiernan, Annabel
    [J]. EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 11 (02) : 186 - 195
  • [32] NOTES: because we can or because we should?
    Chand, Manish
    Nash, Guy F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2008, 101 (04) : 160 - 162
  • [33] Thoracoscopic maze: yes, we can, but should we?
    Mont, Lluis
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2019, 21 (06): : 838 - 839
  • [34] Glycemic Variability Should we and can we prevent it?
    Monnier, Louis
    Colette, Claude
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2008, 31 : S150 - S154
  • [35] Lecture Predicting cancer: can we? Should we?
    Coburn, Cassandra
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (11): : 1494 - 1494
  • [36] Teaching Frameworks for Participation – Can We? Should We?
    Annabel Kiernan
    [J]. European Political Science, 2012, 11 : 186 - 195
  • [37] Reflections on Moral Enhancement: Can We? Should We?
    Rakic, Vojin
    Hughes, James
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 2015, 24 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [38] Cultural studies Can we/ should we reinvent it?
    Couldry, Nick
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CULTURAL STUDIES, 2020, 23 (03) : 292 - 297
  • [39] Assessing values and preferences: Should we, can we?
    Kane, RA
    Degenholtz, H
    [J]. GENERATIONS-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING, 1997, 21 (01): : 19 - 24
  • [40] Should we and can we cure prostate cancer?
    Weldon, VE
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 164 (04): : 341 - 342