Reliability and validity of the UK Biobank cognitive tests

被引:156
|
作者
Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe [1 ,2 ]
Deary, Ian J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Cognit Ageing & Cognit Epidemiol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 04期
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
INTELLIGENCE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0231627
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
UK Biobank is a health resource with data from over 500,000 adults. The cognitive assessment in UK Biobank is brief and bespoke, and is administered without supervision on a touchscreen computer. Psychometric information on the UK Biobank cognitive tests are limited. Despite the non-standard nature of these tests and the limited psychometric information, the UK Biobank cognitive data have been used in numerous scientific publications. The present study examined the validity and short-term test-retest reliability of the UK Biobank cognitive tests. A sample of 160 participants (mean age = 62.59, SD = 10.24) was recruited who completed the UK Biobank cognitive assessment and a range of well-validated cognitive tests ('reference tests'). Fifty-two participants returned 4 weeks later to repeat the UK Biobank tests. Correlations were calculated between UK Biobank tests and reference tests. Two measures of general cognitive ability were created by entering scores on the UK Biobank cognitive tests, and scores on the reference tests, respectively, into separate principal component analyses and saving scores on the first principal component. Four-week test-retest correlations were calculated for UK Biobank tests. UK Biobank cognitive tests showed a range of correlations with their respective reference tests, i.e. those tests that are thought to assess the same underlying cognitive ability (mean Pearson r = 0.53, range = 0.22 to 0.83, p <= .005). The measure of general cognitive ability based on the UK Biobank cognitive tests correlated at r = 0.83 (p <.001) with a measure of general cognitive ability created using the reference tests. Four-week test-retest reliability of the UK Biobank tests were moderate-to-high (mean Pearson r = 0.55, range = 0.40 to 0.89, p..003). Despite the brief, non-standard nature of the UK Biobank cognitive tests, some tests showed substantial concurrent validity and test-retest reliability. These psychometric results provide currently-lacking information on the validity of the UK Biobank cognitive tests.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Reliability and Validity of the Seashore Tests of Musical Talent
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1928, 18 (05): : 415 - 415
  • [42] Evaluation of the reliability and validity of computerized tests of attention
    Langner, Robert E.
    Scharnowski, Frank J.
    Ionta, Silvio
    Salmon, Carlos G.
    Piper, Brian G.
    Pamplona, Gustavo S. P. G.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [43] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF TRUE-FALSE TESTS
    GROSSE, ME
    WRIGHT, BD
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1985, 45 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [44] An evaluation of the specificity, validity and reliability of jumping tests
    Young, W
    MacDonald, C
    Heggen, T
    Fitzpatrick, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 1997, 37 (04): : 240 - 245
  • [45] Reliability and factor validity of agility tests in squash
    Vuckovic, G
    Dezman, B
    Erculj, F
    [J]. KINESIOLOGY NEW PERSPECTIVES, PROCEEDINGS BOOK, 2002, : 939 - 942
  • [46] Reliability and validity of two tests of soccer skill
    Ali, Ajmol
    Williams, Clyde
    Hulse, Mark
    Strudwick, Anthony
    Reddin, Jonathan
    Howarth, Lee
    Eldred, John
    Hirst, Matthew
    McGregor, Steve
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2007, 25 (13) : 1461 - 1470
  • [47] Validity and reliability of rapidly alternating movement tests
    Arceneaux, JM
    Kirkendall, DJ
    Hill, SK
    Dean, RS
    Anderson, JL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 89 (3-4) : 281 - 286
  • [48] UK Biobank
    不详
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2022, 50 (04): : 254 - 254
  • [49] The UK Biobank
    Matthews, Paul M.
    Sudlow, Cathie
    [J]. BRAIN, 2015, 138 : 3463 - 3465
  • [50] The UK Biobank
    Rusk, Nicole
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2018, 15 (12) : 1001 - 1001