Reliability and validity of the UK Biobank cognitive tests

被引:157
|
作者
Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe [1 ,2 ]
Deary, Ian J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Cognit Ageing & Cognit Epidemiol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 04期
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
INTELLIGENCE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0231627
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
UK Biobank is a health resource with data from over 500,000 adults. The cognitive assessment in UK Biobank is brief and bespoke, and is administered without supervision on a touchscreen computer. Psychometric information on the UK Biobank cognitive tests are limited. Despite the non-standard nature of these tests and the limited psychometric information, the UK Biobank cognitive data have been used in numerous scientific publications. The present study examined the validity and short-term test-retest reliability of the UK Biobank cognitive tests. A sample of 160 participants (mean age = 62.59, SD = 10.24) was recruited who completed the UK Biobank cognitive assessment and a range of well-validated cognitive tests ('reference tests'). Fifty-two participants returned 4 weeks later to repeat the UK Biobank tests. Correlations were calculated between UK Biobank tests and reference tests. Two measures of general cognitive ability were created by entering scores on the UK Biobank cognitive tests, and scores on the reference tests, respectively, into separate principal component analyses and saving scores on the first principal component. Four-week test-retest correlations were calculated for UK Biobank tests. UK Biobank cognitive tests showed a range of correlations with their respective reference tests, i.e. those tests that are thought to assess the same underlying cognitive ability (mean Pearson r = 0.53, range = 0.22 to 0.83, p <= .005). The measure of general cognitive ability based on the UK Biobank cognitive tests correlated at r = 0.83 (p <.001) with a measure of general cognitive ability created using the reference tests. Four-week test-retest reliability of the UK Biobank tests were moderate-to-high (mean Pearson r = 0.55, range = 0.40 to 0.89, p..003). Despite the brief, non-standard nature of the UK Biobank cognitive tests, some tests showed substantial concurrent validity and test-retest reliability. These psychometric results provide currently-lacking information on the validity of the UK Biobank cognitive tests.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Associations Between Brain Volumes and Cognitive Tests with Hypertensive Burden in UK Biobank
    Newby, Danielle
    Winchester, Laura
    Sproviero, William
    Fernandes, Marco
    Wang, Di
    Kormilitzin, Andrey
    Launer, Lenore J.
    Nevado-Holgado, Alejo J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2021, 84 (03) : 1373 - 1389
  • [2] Age and cognitive decline in the UK Biobank
    Cornelis, Marilyn C.
    Wang, Yamin
    Holland, Thomas
    Agarwal, Puja
    Weintraub, Sandra
    Morris, Martha Clare
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [3] The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: A UK meta-analysis
    Bertua, C
    Anderson, N
    Salgado, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 78 : 387 - 409
  • [4] Feasibility, reliability, and validity of ambulatory cognitive tests in fibromyalgia and matched controls
    Valentine, Thomas R.
    Kratz, Anna L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 29 (09) : 893 - 901
  • [5] ASSESSING THE VALIDITY OF MINIMAL PHENOTYPING: A UK BIOBANK STUDY
    Woolf, Benjamin
    Haworth, Claire
    Davis, Oliver
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 51 : E43 - E43
  • [6] A General Cognitive Ability Factor for the UK Biobank
    Camille Michèle Williams
    Ghislaine Labouret
    Tobias Wolfram
    Hugo Peyre
    Franck Ramus
    [J]. Behavior Genetics, 2023, 53 : 85 - 100
  • [7] A General Cognitive Ability Factor for the UK Biobank
    Williams, Camille Michele
    Labouret, Ghislaine
    Wolfram, Tobias
    Peyre, Hugo
    Ramus, Franck
    [J]. BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2023, 53 (02) : 85 - 100
  • [8] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF PERSONALITY TESTS
    Stocker, Bernhard
    [J]. 12TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL BATA CONFERENCE FOR PH.D. STUDENTS AND YOUNG RESEARCHERS (DOKBAT), 2016, : 354 - 360
  • [9] Reliability and validity of diagnostic tests
    Kyriacou, DN
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (04) : 404 - 405
  • [10] THE SLINGERLAND TESTS - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
    FULMER, S
    FULMER, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 1983, 16 (10) : 591 - 595