Population size and diversity of Frankia in soils of Ceanothus velutinus and Douglas-fir stands

被引:20
|
作者
Jeong, SC
Myrold, DD
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Environm Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
来源
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY | 2001年 / 33卷 / 7-8期
关键词
Frankia; Ceanorhus; diversity; populations;
D O I
10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00241-8
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The influence of host plants on Frankia populations was investigated using soils from Ceanothus velutinus (Dougl.) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) stands. Population sizes of Ceanothus-infective Frankia in the soils were measured using plant bioassays with C. velutinus. C. sanguineus (Pursh), and C. integerrimus (H. & A.) as trap plants. The Frankia population in soil from the C. velutinus stand soil was about 10 times higher than that from the Douglas-fir stand. This result supports previous reports that, although the presence of host plants increases Frankia populations. Frankia persist without host plants, Nodulation capacities of the three trap plants were not significantly different. All nodules showed N-2 fixation activity using the acetylene reduction assay. The diversity of Frankia that nodulated trap plants was examined using repetitive intergenic DNA and the polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR). A newly designed, direct repeat sequence and a BOX sequence were used as rep-PCR primers. The results showed that infective Frankia in the two soils contained a common group of Frankia as well as some Frankia strains unique to each soil. The level of host specificity of the infective Frankia was low; however, one group of Frankia nodulated only C. integerrimus seedlings. Taken together, the results suggest that the higher populations in the soil from the C. velutinus stand may be due to preferential increases in particular groups of Frankia. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 941
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of selection and breeding on the genetic diversity in Douglas-fir
    ElKassaby, Y
    Ritland, K
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 1996, 5 (06) : 795 - 813
  • [32] SIMULATION OF COMPETITION FOR LIGHT IN EVEN-AGED STANDS OF DOUGLAS-FIR
    VANGERWEN, CP
    SPITTERS, CJT
    MOHREN, GMJ
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1987, 18 (02) : 135 - 152
  • [33] ALLOZYME VARIATION AND MATING SYSTEM OF 3 DOUGLAS-FIR STANDS IN SWITZERLAND
    STAUFFER, A
    ADAMS, WT
    [J]. SILVAE GENETICA, 1993, 42 (4-5) : 254 - 258
  • [34] SIMULATION OF PRIMARY PRODUCTION IN EVEN-AGED STANDS OF DOUGLAS-FIR
    MOHREN, GMJ
    VANGERWEN, CP
    SPITTERS, CJT
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1984, 9 (01) : 27 - 49
  • [35] NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AN AGE SEQUENCE OF WESTERN WASHINGTON DOUGLAS-FIR STANDS
    TURNER, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1981, 48 (02) : 159 - 169
  • [36] Underplanted conifer seedling survival and growth in thinned Douglas-fir stands
    Intl. Inst. of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service, P.O. Box 25000, San Juan 00928, Puerto Rico
    [J]. Can. J. For. Res., 2 (302-312):
  • [37] GROWTH RESPONSE OF YOUNG DOUGLAS-FIR STANDS TO FIRST THINNING APPLICATION
    Dusek, David
    Slodicak, Marian
    Novak, Jiri
    Cerny, Jakub
    [J]. REPORTS OF FORESTRY RESEARCH-ZPRAVY LESNICKEHO VYZKUMU, 2018, 63 (01): : 20 - 27
  • [38] Aboveground biomass and nutrient content of five Douglas-fir stands in France
    Ponette, Q
    Ranger, J
    Ottorini, JM
    Ulrich, E
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2001, 142 (1-3) : 109 - 127
  • [39] The geographic origin of old Douglas-fir stands growing in Central Europe
    Wolfgang Josef Hintsteiner
    Marcela van Loo
    Charalambos Neophytou
    Silvio Schueler
    Hubert Hasenauer
    [J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2018, 137 : 447 - 461
  • [40] Underplanted conifer seedling survival and growth in thinned Douglas-fir stands
    Brandeis, TJ
    Newton, M
    Cole, EC
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 2001, 31 (02): : 302 - 312