Lunar satellite orbit determination analysis and quality assessment from Lunar Prospector tracking data and SELENE simulations

被引:10
|
作者
Goossens, Sander [1 ]
Matsumoto, Koji [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Nat Sci, Natl Astron Observ Japan, Oshu, Iwate 0230861, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
low lunar satellite orbits; lunar prospector; SELENE; gravity field determination; covariance analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2006.12.008
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Low lunar satellite orbit accuracy is assessed by means of the analysis of tracking data. residuals, orbit overlap statistics and covariance propagation. A full-scale determination of a degree and order 75 spherical harmonies lunar gravity field model from 3 months of Lunar Prospector tracking data shows the influence of processing strategies for gravity field modelling. Despite large differences in gravity anomalies over the far side between this model and a comparable existing model, both models show similar results in terms of orbit performance. Analysis of residuals and overlap statistics using the LPI50Q gravity field model shows the Doppler data fit to be at the level of a few mm/s. Three-dimensional orbit consistency is found to be at the level of 50-300 m, for polar orbits with altitudes ranging from 30 to 100 km. Covariance analysis shows that the expected radial orbit error as computed from the covariance of an anticipated gravity field model using SELENE data will be less than I m. Current gravity field models are shown to be tuned towards the polar orbit, while having expected orbit errors of several orders of magnitude larger for other inclinations, especially in the mid-range, from 40 degrees to 80 degrees. (C) 2006 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the analysis of lunar albedo effects on low lunar orbit and gravity field determination
    Floberghagen, R
    Visser, P
    Weischede, F
    Vasile, M
    SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS 1998, VOL 100, PART 1 AND 2, 1998, 100 : 241 - 255
  • [22] Lunar surface geochemistry: Global concentrations of Th, K, and FeO as derived from lunar prospector and Clementine data
    Gillis, JJ
    Jolliff, BL
    Korotev, RL
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2004, 68 (18) : 3791 - 3805
  • [23] A simulation study for anticipated accuracy of lunar gravity field model by SELENE tracking data
    Matsumoto, Koji
    Hanada, Hideo
    Namiki, Noriyuki
    Iwata, Takahiro
    Goossens, Sander
    Tsuruta, Seiitsu
    Kawano, Nobuyuki
    Rowlands, David D.
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2008, 42 (02) : 331 - 336
  • [24] High resolution lunar gravity anomaly map from the lunar prospector line-of-sight acceleration data
    Takayuki Sugano
    Kosuke Heki
    Earth, Planets and Space, 2004, 56 : 81 - 86
  • [25] LUNAR GRAVITATIONAL FIELD AS DETERMINED FROM LUNAR ORBITER TRACKING DATA
    GAPCYNSKY, JP
    BLACKSHE.WT
    COMPTON, HR
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1969, 7 (10) : 1905 - +
  • [26] High resolution lunar gravity anomaly map from the lunar prospector line-of-sight acceleration data
    Sugano, T
    Heki, K
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2004, 56 (01): : 81 - 86
  • [27] Low lunar orbit analysis, determination and selection for soft landing on the lunar south pole
    Floberghagen, R
    Visser, P
    Vasile, M
    12TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SPACE FLIGHT DYNAMICS, 1997, 403 : 321 - 326
  • [28] Long-wavelength lunar gravity field recovery from simulated orbit and inter-satellite tracking data
    Yan, Jianguo
    Baur, Oliver
    Fei, Li
    Ping Jinsong
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2013, 52 (11) : 1919 - 1928
  • [29] A Simulation Study of Orbit Determination for Lunar Probe via Relay Satellite
    Cao, Jianfeng
    Liu, Lei
    Liu, Ye
    Su, Weigang
    Hu, Songjie
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH CONFERENCE OF SPACECRAFT TT&C TECHNOLOGY IN CHINA: OPENNESS, INTEGRATION AND INTELLIGENT INTERCONNECTION, 2018, 445 : 143 - 151
  • [30] ORBIT DETERMINATION FOR LUNAR FARSIDE PROBE BASED ON RELAY COMMUNICATION SATELLITE
    Yang, Yadi
    Tang, Yuhua
    Qiao, Dong
    THIRD IAA CONFERENCE ON DYNAMICS AND CONTROL OF SPACE SYSTEMS 2017, 2017, 161 : 303 - 311