Flood monitoring by integration of Remote Sensing technique and Multi-Criteria Decision Making method

被引:37
|
作者
Farhadi, Hadi [1 ]
Esmaeily, Ali [2 ]
Najafzadeh, Mohammad [3 ]
机构
[1] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Surveying Engn, Dept Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, Tehran, Iran
[2] Grad Univ Adv Technol, Fac Civil & Surveying Engn, Dept Surveying Engn, Kerman, Iran
[3] Grad Univ Adv Technol, Fac Civil & Surveying Engn, Dept Water Engn, Kerman, Iran
关键词
Elimination and choice expressing reality; Flood; Support vector machine; Band selection; Sentinel-2; BAND SELECTION; TARGET DETECTION; PROMETHEE TECHNIQUE; WATER-QUALITY; LANDSAT; 8; CLASSIFICATION; ACCURACY; DROUGHT; SYSTEM; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105045
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Traditional methodologies of flood monitoring are generally time-consuming and demanding tasks. In most cases, there is no possibility of flood monitoring in large areas. Due to the major drawbacks of conventional methods in flood detection of large districts, Remote Sensing (RS) has been efficiently employed as the best solution owing to its being synoptic view and cost-effective methodologies. One of the most challenging issues in RS technologies is choosing the optimal spectral bands to detect changes in the natural environment. In this research, Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE), as one of the most widely used Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques, was applied to select the optimal bands of Sentinel-2 satellite images for detection of flood-affected areas. For this purpose, the decision-making method was implemented during ten options and six criteria. The properties of the Sentinel-2 satellite images consisted of ten bands (with 10 and 20m spatial resolutions) and the criteria are the signal to noise ratio (SNR) related to sensor, standard deviation, variance, the SNR related to the bands, spatial resolution, and wavelength. Afterward, the ELECTRE technique was used to select six optimal bands among ten bands. The ELECTRE algorithm was programmed in MATLAB programming language that could make decisions with multiple options and multiple criteria. Furthermore, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification method, as one of the most powerful Machine Learning (ML) models, has been applied to classify the water bodies related to before and after the flood. According to the results of optimal bands classification, Overall Accuracy (OA) and Kappa Coefficient (KC) for the pre-flood classification were 93.65 percent and 0.923, respectively, and for the post-flood classification, the OA and KC values were 94.52 percent and 0.935 respectively. In the case of before and after flooding, the results of classification model for optimal bands had more accuracy levels in comparison with those obtained by original bands. Generally, it was found that the ELECTRE technique for selecting the best bands of Sentinel-2 satellite images and detection of flood-affected areas, in a short period of time with high accuracy, offers remarkable and consistent results.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spatial probabilistic multi-criteria decision making for assessment of flood management alternatives
    Ahmadisharaf, Ebrahim
    Kalyanapu, Alfred J.
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 533 : 365 - 378
  • [22] A Multi-criteria Decision-making Optimization Model for Flood Management in Reservoirs
    Banafsheh Nematollahi
    Mohammad Reza Nikoo
    Amir H. Gandomi
    Nasser Talebbeydokhti
    Gholam Reza Rakhshandehroo
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2022, 36 : 4933 - 4949
  • [23] Method of dynamic multi-criteria decision-making based on integration of absolute and relative differences
    Dong Qing-xing
    Guo Ya-jun
    He Zhi-yong
    [J]. 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTER CONTROL (ICACC 2010), VOL. 1, 2010, : 353 - 356
  • [24] A Hybrid GIS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Flood Susceptibility Mapping at Shangyou, China
    Wang, Yi
    Hong, Haoyuan
    Chen, Wei
    Li, Shaojun
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Gigovic, Ljubomir
    Drobnjak, Sinisa
    Dieu Tien Bui
    Duan, Hexiang
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (01)
  • [25] Multi-criteria decision making in ontologies
    Bastinos, Ana Sasa
    Krisper, Marjan
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 222 : 593 - 610
  • [26] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    [J]. MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [27] Fundamentals of multi-criteria decision making
    不详
    [J]. EFFICIENCY VERSUS SUSTAINABILITY IN DYNAMIC DECISION MAKING, 2002, 520 : 21 - 73
  • [28] Pareto multi-criteria decision making
    Grierson, Donald E.
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2008, 22 (03) : 371 - 384
  • [29] Categorization in multi-criteria decision making
    Yager, Ronald R.
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 460 : 416 - 423
  • [30] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method with Belief Preference Relations
    Ennaceur, Amel
    Elouedi, Zied
    Lefevre, Eric
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2014, 22 (04) : 573 - 590