MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS FOR EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SYSTEM RISK

被引:8
|
作者
Olson, David L. [1 ]
Wu, Desheng Dash [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Management, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, RiskLab, Toronto, ON M5S 3E6, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, RiskChina Res Ctr, Toronto, ON M5S 3E6, Canada
关键词
Enterprise risk management; Information technology risks; enterprise systems; multiple criteria; DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis); PCA (Principal Component Analysis);
D O I
10.1142/S021759591100303X
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Information technology (IT) involve a wide set of risks. Enterprise information systems are a major developing form of information technology involving their own set of risks, thus creating potential blind spots. This paper describes risk management issues involved in enterprise resource planning systems (ERP) which have high impact on organizations due to their high cost, and their pervasive impact on organizational operations. Alternative means of acquiring ERP systems, to include outsourcing to application service providers (ASPs) are available. But outsourcing ERP involves many risks that are often overlooked. After identification of typical risks involved with representative alternative forms of ERP, multiple criteria analysis is proposed as a useful tool for tradeoff analysis in this selection decision. SMART is compared with popular approaches such as DEA and PCA-based DEA. A demonstration of how multiple criteria analysis can be applied in the international ERP alternative selection decision is given by including outsourcing to China and South Korea.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 39
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantified Evaluation and Criteria Analysis for DMPPT PV System
    Wang, Feng
    Lee, Fred C.
    Yue, Xiaolong
    Zhuo, Fang
    2015 17TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON POWER ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (EPE'15 ECCE-EUROPE), 2015,
  • [42] Multiple criteria evaluation of transportation system improvement projects: the case of Korea
    1600, Inst for Transportation, Durham, NC, United States (29):
  • [43] Experimental evaluation of a graphical display system to visualizing multiple criteria solutions
    Klimberg, R
    Cohen, RM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 119 (01) : 191 - 208
  • [44] Multiple criteria evaluation of different redesign variants of the public tram system
    Janiak, Maja Kiba
    Zak, Jacek
    17TH MEETING OF THE EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, EWGT2014, 2014, 3 : 690 - 699
  • [45] MULTIPLE CRITERIA EVALUATION OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - THE CASE OF KOREA
    TABUCANON, MT
    LEE, HM
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 1995, 29 (01) : 127 - 143
  • [46] RISK EVALUATION OF INCREMENTAL INNOVATION IN LOGISTIC INFORMATION SYSTEM
    Sorokac, Adam
    Rigali, Luca
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY (IMES 2019), 2019, : 862 - 873
  • [47] SELECTING A FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM USING MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS
    STAM, A
    KUULA, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1991, 29 (04) : 803 - 820
  • [48] A VIKOR-BASED MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION METHOD FOR IMPROVING INFORMATION SECURITY RISK
    Yang, Yu-Ping Ou
    Shieh, How-Ming
    Leu, Jun-Der
    Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2009, 8 (02) : 267 - 287
  • [49] INTEGRATED MODEL AND SYSTEM FOR PASSIVE HOUSES MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS
    Kaklauskas, Arturas
    Rute, Jevgenija
    Gudauskas, Renaldas
    Banaitis, Audrius
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2011, 15 (01) : 74 - 90
  • [50] CoA advisory system based on the multiple criteria decision analysis
    Bélanger, M
    Guitouni, A
    Hunter, C
    ADVANCES IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, 59 : 302 - 307