Non-closure of peritoneal surfaces at caesarean section - a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Bamigboye, AA [1 ]
Hofmeyr, J
机构
[1] Rob Ferreira & Mediclin Hosp, Nelspruit, South Africa
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Effect Care Res Unit, Johannesburg, South Africa
来源
SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2005年 / 95卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Caesarean section (CS) is a very common surgical procedure worldwide. Suturing the peritoneal layers at CS may or may not confer benefit, hence the need to evaluate whether this step should be omitted or not. Objectives. To assess the effects of non-closure as an alternative to closure of the peritoneum at CS on intraoperative, immediate and later postoperative, and long-term outcomes. Search strategy. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (November 2002) and the Cochrane Central Controlled Trials Register (October 2003). Selection criteria. Randomised controlled trials that compared leaving the visceral and/or parietal peritoneum unsutured at CS with suturing the peritoneum, in women undergoing elective or emergency CS. Data collection and analysis. Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted by two reviewers. Main results. Nine trials involving 1811 women were included and analysed. The methodological quality of the trials was variable. Non-closure of the peritoneum reduced operating time when both layers or one layer was not sutured. For both layers, the operating time was reduced by 7.33 minutes (95% confidence interval (Cl): -8.43 - -6.24). There was significantly less postoperative fever and reduced postoperative stay in hospital for non-closure of the visceral peritoneum and non-closure of both layers. There were no other statistically significant differences. The trend for analgesia requirement and wound infection tended to favour non-closure, while endometritis results were variable. Longterm follow-up in 1 trial showed no significant differences. The power of the latter study to show differences was low. Conclusions. There was improved short-term postoperative outcome if the peritoneum was not closed. Long-term studies following CS are limited, but data from other surgical procedures are reassuring. At present there is no evidence to justify the time taken and cost of peritoneal closure.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 126
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Suture Closure versus Non-Closure of Subcutaneous Fat and Cosmetic Outcome after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Husslein, Heinrich
    Gutschi, Martina
    Leipold, Heinz
    Herbst, Christoph
    Franz, Maximilian
    Worda, Christof
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12):
  • [32] Non-closure of visceral peritoneum at abdominal hysterectomy
    Kucuk, M
    Okman, TK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2001, 75 (03) : 317 - 319
  • [33] Capsule closure has better hip function than non-closure in hip arthroscopy for femoracetabular impingement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lv, Yang
    Yang, Meiping
    Hu, Cheng
    Guo, Da
    Zhao, Caiqiong
    Wei, Li
    Xu, Shuchai
    Lin, Dingkun
    Yang, Weiming
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (10)
  • [34] Closure versus non-closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Abdelkarim, Mostafa
    Shehadeh, Ahmad
    Mohsin, Muhammad Mahid
    Khan, Khursheed Ahmed
    Morgan, Richard
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (08): : 3306 - 3320
  • [35] Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature
    Katsuhito Suwa
    Tomoyoshi Okamoto
    Katsuhiko Yanaga
    [J]. Surgery Today, 2016, 46 : 764 - 773
  • [36] Uterine wound healing after caesarean section: A systematic review
    Debras, E.
    Capmas, P.
    Maudot, C.
    Chavatte-Palmer, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 296 : 83 - 90
  • [37] Systematic review of urological injury during caesarean section and hysterectomy
    Wei, Gavin
    Harley, Frances
    O'Callaghan, Michael
    Adshead, James
    Hennessey, Derek
    Kinnear, Ned
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 (02) : 371 - 389
  • [38] Systematic review of urological injury during caesarean section and hysterectomy
    Gavin Wei
    Frances Harley
    Michael O’Callaghan
    James Adshead
    Derek Hennessey
    Ned Kinnear
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2023, 34 : 371 - 389
  • [39] Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature
    Suwa, Katsuhito
    Okamoto, Tomoyoshi
    Yanaga, Katsuhiko
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2016, 46 (07) : 764 - 773
  • [40] Caesarean section rates following pelvic fracture: A systematic review
    Riehl, John T.
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2014, 45 (10): : 1516 - 1521