Non-closure of peritoneal surfaces at caesarean section - a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Bamigboye, AA [1 ]
Hofmeyr, J
机构
[1] Rob Ferreira & Mediclin Hosp, Nelspruit, South Africa
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Effect Care Res Unit, Johannesburg, South Africa
来源
SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2005年 / 95卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Caesarean section (CS) is a very common surgical procedure worldwide. Suturing the peritoneal layers at CS may or may not confer benefit, hence the need to evaluate whether this step should be omitted or not. Objectives. To assess the effects of non-closure as an alternative to closure of the peritoneum at CS on intraoperative, immediate and later postoperative, and long-term outcomes. Search strategy. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (November 2002) and the Cochrane Central Controlled Trials Register (October 2003). Selection criteria. Randomised controlled trials that compared leaving the visceral and/or parietal peritoneum unsutured at CS with suturing the peritoneum, in women undergoing elective or emergency CS. Data collection and analysis. Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted by two reviewers. Main results. Nine trials involving 1811 women were included and analysed. The methodological quality of the trials was variable. Non-closure of the peritoneum reduced operating time when both layers or one layer was not sutured. For both layers, the operating time was reduced by 7.33 minutes (95% confidence interval (Cl): -8.43 - -6.24). There was significantly less postoperative fever and reduced postoperative stay in hospital for non-closure of the visceral peritoneum and non-closure of both layers. There were no other statistically significant differences. The trend for analgesia requirement and wound infection tended to favour non-closure, while endometritis results were variable. Longterm follow-up in 1 trial showed no significant differences. The power of the latter study to show differences was low. Conclusions. There was improved short-term postoperative outcome if the peritoneum was not closed. Long-term studies following CS are limited, but data from other surgical procedures are reassuring. At present there is no evidence to justify the time taken and cost of peritoneal closure.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 126
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Peritoneal closure or non-closure at caesarean section
    van Bogaert, L-J.
    Misra, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 29 (03) : 217 - 219
  • [2] To close or not to close? A systematic review and a meta-analysis of peritoneal non-closure and adhesion formation after caesarean section
    Cheong, Y. C.
    Premkumar, G.
    Metwally, M.
    Peacock, J. L.
    Li, T. C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 147 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [3] ADVANTAGE OF NON-CLOSURE OF THE PERITONEUM AT CAESAREAN SECTION
    Bhaumik, Narayan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (01): : 79 - 81
  • [4] Parietal peritoneal closure versus non-closure at caesarean section: which technique is feasible to perform?
    Altinbas, Sadiman Kiykac
    Cenksoy, Pinar
    Tapisiz, Omer Lutfi
    Beydilli, Gulay
    Yirci, Bulent
    Ercan, Onder
    Dede, Suat
    Kandemir, Omer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (11): : 1128 - 1131
  • [5] Two cases of significant postoperative morbidity following peritoneal non-closure at caesarean section
    Owen, R.
    Polson, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 29 (01) : 65 - 66
  • [6] Closure vs non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: Evaluation of pain
    Atabekoglu, C. S.
    Turkcuoglu, I.
    Duru, B.
    Sonmezer, M.
    Suer, G.
    Uysalel, A.
    Koc, A.
    Soylemez, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 31 (04) : 307 - 310
  • [7] Towards a simplification of caesarean section technique: Non-closure of peritoneum?
    Malek-Mellouli, M.
    Ibrahima, S.
    Ben Amara, F.
    Neji, K.
    Bouchneck, M.
    Youssef, A.
    Nasr, M.
    Zouari, B.
    Reziga, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2011, 40 (06): : 541 - 548
  • [8] PERITONEAL CLOSURE OR NON-CLOSURE AT CESAREAN
    PIETRANTONI, M
    PARSONS, MT
    OBRIEN, WF
    COLLINS, E
    KNUPPEL, RA
    SPELLACY, WN
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 77 (02): : 293 - 296
  • [9] Postoperative obstruction following caesarean section possibly due to non-closure of the peritoneum
    van der Wal, C.
    Maharajan, P. A.
    Nicholls, J. S. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 28 (02) : 239 - 240
  • [10] Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes
    Bamigboye, Anthony A.
    Hofmeyr, G. Justus
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (08):