Impacts of Climatic Variability on Agricultural Total Factor Productivity Growth in the Southern United States

被引:2
|
作者
Joshi, Kartik [1 ]
Lachaud, Michee A. [2 ]
Solis, Daniel [2 ]
Alvarez, Sergio [3 ]
机构
[1] Aga Khan Rural Support Programme, Ahmadabad 380009, Gujarat, India
[2] Florida A&M Univ, Coll Agr & Food Sci, Agribusiness Program, Tallahassee, FL 32307 USA
[3] Univ Cent Florida, Rosen Coll Hospitality Management, Orlando, FL 32819 USA
关键词
stochastic production frontiers; technical efficiency; climate variability; agriculture; Southern United States; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PAKISTAN;
D O I
10.3390/environments9100129
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study investigates the impact of climatic variability on both agricultural production and total factor productivity (TFP) in the Southern United States (US). It also aims at identifying the drivers of productivity in this region. The analysis is tailored to inform decision makers about effective policy options to increase and sustain productivity in this important agricultural region. We use data from the US Department of Agriculture, National Climatic Data Center, and US Geological Survey to estimate alternative stochastic production frontier models. The estimated parameters are then analyzed and used to compute and decompose TFP into several measures of efficiency. The results show that agricultural production in the Southern US is more responsive to labor and has been increasing at a 1.13 percent rate annually. The findings also suggest that while precipitation, on average, has a positive and significant impact on productivity, intra-annual variation in both temperature and precipitation, which can be considered as anomalies, has a negative and significant impact on production. The impact of climatic effects on productivity across states is mixed and technological progress has been the main driver of TFP growth. Findings indicate that climatic variability is having a negative impact on agricultural productivity in the Southern US, similar in magnitude to the positive impact of irrigation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mechanisation's impact on agricultural total factor productivity
    Cui, Yuxin
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2023, 69 (11): : 446 - 457
  • [32] FIXED FACTOR MODELS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH
    YEE, J
    HAUVER, JH
    BALL, VE
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 1993, 25 (09) : 1187 - 1196
  • [33] Agricultural impacts of sustainable water use in the United States
    Graham, Neal T.
    Iyer, Gokul
    Hejazi, Mohamad I.
    Kim, Son H.
    Patel, Pralit
    Binsted, Matthew
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [34] Agricultural impacts of sustainable water use in the United States
    Neal T. Graham
    Gokul Iyer
    Mohamad I. Hejazi
    Son H. Kim
    Pralit Patel
    Matthew Binsted
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [35] Determinants of total factor productivity in Indian states
    Misra, Biswa Swarup
    [J]. INDIAN GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2019, 13 (01) : 259 - 282
  • [36] Seasonality of climatic drivers of flood variability in the conterminous United States
    Dickinson, Jesse E.
    Harden, Tessa M.
    McCabe, Gregory J.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [37] Seasonality of climatic drivers of flood variability in the conterminous United States
    Jesse E. Dickinson
    Tessa M. Harden
    Gregory J. McCabe
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 9
  • [38] CLIMATIC VARIABILITY AT 10 STATIONS ACROSS THE UNITED-STATES
    VINING, KC
    GRIFFITHS, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE AND APPLIED METEOROLOGY, 1985, 24 (04): : 363 - 370
  • [39] Agricultural productivity: reduction of the productivity gap between Brazil and United States of America
    Ribeiro Vieira Filho, Jose Eustaquio
    Fornazier, Armando
    [J]. CEPAL REVIEW, 2016, (118): : 215 - 233
  • [40] Measurement of agricultural total factor productivity growth incorporating environmental factors: A nutrients balance approach
    Viet-Ngu Hoang
    Coelli, Tim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 62 (03) : 462 - 474