Stomatal conductance and not stomatal density determines the long-term reduction in leaf transpiration of poplar in elevated CO2

被引:85
|
作者
Tricker, PJ
Trewin, H
Kull, O
Clarkson, GJJ
Eensalu, E
Tallis, MJ
Colella, A
Doncaster, CP
Sabatti, M
Taylor, G
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Biol Sci, Southampton SO16 7PX, Hants, England
[2] Inst Bot & Ecol, EE-51005 Tartu, Estonia
[3] Univ Naples 2, Dept Environm Sci, I-81100 Caserta, Italy
[4] Univ Tuscia, Dept Forest Environm & Resources, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Populus x euramericana; stomatal numbers; stomatal conductance POPFACE;
D O I
10.1007/s00442-005-0025-4
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Using a free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment, poplar trees (Populus x euramericana clone 1214) were exposed to either ambient or elevated [CO2] from planting, for a 5-year period during canopy development, closure, coppice and re-growth. In each year, measurements were taken of stomatal density (SD, number mm(-2)) and stomatal index (SI, the proportion of epidermal cells forming stomata). In year 5, measurements were also taken of leaf stomatal conductance (g(s) mu mol m(-2) s(-1)), photosynthetic CO2 fixation (A, mmol m(-2) s(-1)), instantaneous water-use efficiency (A/E) and the ratio of intercellular to atmospheric CO2 (C-i:C-a). Elevated [CO2] caused reductions in SI in the first year, and in SD in the first 2 years, when the canopy was largely open. In following years, when the canopy had closed, elevated [CO2] had no detectable effects on stomatal numbers or index. In contrast, even after 5 years of exposure to elevated [CO2], g(s) was reduced, A/E was stimulated, and C-i:C-a was reduced relative to ambient [CO2]. These outcomes from the long-term realistic field conditions of this forest FACE experiment suggest that stomatal numbers (SD and SI) had no role in determining the improved instantaneous leaf-level efficiency of water use under elevated [CO2]. We propose that altered cuticular development during canopy closure may partially explain the changing response of stomata to elevated [CO2], although the mechanism for this remains obscure.
引用
收藏
页码:652 / 660
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Response of stomatal conductance, transpiration, and photosynthesis to light and CO2 for rice leaves with different appearance days
    Lv, Yuping
    Gu, Linhui
    Man, Runze
    Liu, Xiaoyin
    Xu, Junzeng
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2024, 15
  • [32] Stomatal and pavement cell density linked to leaf internal CO2 concentration
    Santrucek, Jiri
    Vrablova, Martina
    Simkova, Marie
    Hronkova, Marie
    Drtinova, Martina
    Kveton, Jiri
    Vrabl, Daniel
    Kubasek, Jiri
    Mackova, Jana
    Wiesnerova, Dana
    Neuwithova, Jitka
    Schreiber, Lukas
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2014, 114 (02) : 191 - 202
  • [33] Low doses of glyphosate enhance growth, CO2 assimilation, stomatal conductance and transpiration in sugarcane and eucalyptus
    Nascentes, Renan F.
    Carbonari, Caio A.
    Simoes, Plinio S.
    Brunelli, Marcela C.
    Velini, Edivaldo D.
    Duke, Stephen O.
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 74 (05) : 1197 - 1205
  • [34] THE INFLUENCE OF CO2 CONCENTRATION ON STOMATAL DENSITY
    WOODWARD, FI
    KELLY, CK
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1995, 131 (03) : 311 - 327
  • [35] PHOTOSYNTHESIS, CO2 COMPENSATION AND STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE OF YOUNG POPLAR PLANTS GROWN UNDER INTENSIVE CULTURE
    MICHAEL, D
    DICKMAN, D
    NELSON, N
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 63 (05) : 121 - 121
  • [36] What determines the complex kinetics of stomatal conductance under blueless PAR in Festuca arundinacea? Subsequent effects on leaf transpiration
    Barillot, Romain
    Frak, Ela
    Combes, Didier
    Durand, Jean-Louis
    Escobar-Gutierrez, Abraham J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2010, 61 (10) : 2795 - 2806
  • [37] Elevated CO2 increased photosynthesis and yield without decreasing stomatal conductance in broomcorn millet
    Hao, X. Y.
    Li, P.
    Li, H. Y.
    Zong, Y. Z.
    Zhang, B.
    Zhao, J. Z.
    Han, Y. H.
    PHOTOSYNTHETICA, 2017, 55 (01) : 176 - 183
  • [38] Does Low Stomatal Conductance or Photosynthetic Capacity Enhance Growth at Elevated CO2 in Arabidopsis?
    Easlon, Hsien Ming
    Carlisle, Eli
    McKay, John K.
    Bloom, Arnold J.
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 167 (03) : 793 - 799
  • [39] Sensitivity of stomatal and canopy conductance to elevated CO2 concentration -: interacting variables and perspectives of scale
    Wullschleger, SD
    Gunderson, CA
    Hanson, PJ
    Wilson, KB
    Norby, RJ
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2002, 153 (03) : 485 - 496
  • [40] Responses in stomatal conductance to elevated CO2 in 12 grassland species that differ in growth form
    Knapp, AK
    Hamerlynck, EP
    Ham, JM
    Owensby, CE
    VEGETATIO, 1996, 125 (01): : 31 - 41