Intercomparison of results for a PWR rod ejection accident

被引:6
|
作者
Diamond, DJ
Aronson, A
Jo, J
Avvakumov, A
Malofeev, V
Sidorov, V
Ferraresi, P
Gouin, C
Aniel, S
Royer, ME
机构
[1] Brookhaven Natl Lab, Energy Sci & Technol Dept, Nucl Energy & Infrastruct Syst Div, Upton, NY 11973 USA
[2] Russian Res Ctr, Kurchatov Inst, Moscow, Russia
[3] Inst Protect & Nucl Safety, Cadarache, France
[4] CEA, Atom Energy Commiss, Saclay, France
关键词
This work was performed under the auspices of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886;
D O I
10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00375-2
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
This study is part of an overall program to understand the uncertainty in best-estimate calculations of the local fuel enthalpy during the rod ejection accident. Local fuel enthalpy is used as the acceptance criterion for this design-basis event and can also be used to estimate fuel damage for the purpose of determining radiological consequences. The study used results from neutron kinetics models in PARCS, BARS, and CRONOS2, codes developed in the United States, the Russian Federation, and France, respectively. Since BARS uses a heterogeneous representation of the fuel assembly as opposed to the homogeneous representations in PARCS and CRONOS, the effect of the intercomparison was primarily to compare different intra-assembly models. Quantitative comparisons for core power, reactivity, assembly fuel enthalpy and pin power were carried out. In general, the agreement between methods was very good, providing additional confidence in the codes and providing a starting point for a quantitative assessment of the uncertainty in calculated fuel enthalpy using best-estimate methods. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 189
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Rod ejection accident analysis for AP1000 with MOX/UOX mixed core loading
    Selim, Hala K.
    Amin, Esmat H.
    Roushdy, Hassan E.
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2017, 109 : 385 - 395
  • [32] Control rod ejection accident simulation and sensitivity analysis of large advanced pressurized water reactor
    Lan B.
    Pan X.
    Yu S.
    Yi Y.
    He Jishu/Nuclear Techniques, 2023, 46 (02):
  • [33] NUCLEAR ACCIDENT DOSIMETRY INTERCOMPARISON STUDIES
    SIMS, CS
    SWAJA, RE
    OYAN, R
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1986, 50 : S23 - S23
  • [34] Vibration analysis of PWR fuel rod
    Kim, HK
    Kim, MS
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2005, 282 (1-2) : 553 - 572
  • [35] INTERCOMPARISON OF CRITICALITY ACCIDENT DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS
    GREENE, RT
    SWAJA, RE
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1983, 45 (01): : 191 - 191
  • [36] NUCLEAR ACCIDENT DOSIMETRY INTERCOMPARISON STUDIES
    SIMS, CS
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1989, 57 (03): : 439 - 448
  • [37] Fuel performance evaluation of two high burnup PWR core designs during normal operation, control rod withdrawal, and control rod ejection scenarios
    Lindsay, Isabelle O.
    Fox, Mason
    Sweet, Ryan T.
    Capps, Nathan
    Brown, Nicholas R.
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2023, 415
  • [38] Core analysis of accident tolerant fuel cladding for SMART reactor under normal operation and rod ejection accident using DRAGON and PARCS
    Pourrostam, A.
    Talebi, S.
    Safarzadeh, O.
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 53 (03) : 741 - 751
  • [39] EFFECTS OF NUCLEAR DATA UNCERTAINTIES ON THE NEA/OECD PWR MOX/UO2 CORE ROD EJECTION BENCHMARK
    Pasichnyk, Ihor
    Klein, Markus
    Velkov, Kiril
    Zwermann, Winfried
    Pautz, Andreas
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 183 (03) : 464 - 472
  • [40] Assessment of an integral small modular reactor during rod ejection accident by using DRAGON/PARCS codes
    Akbari-Jeyhouni, Reza
    Ochbelagh, Dariush Rezaei
    Gharib, Ahmad
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2018, 108 : 136 - 143