Return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - A review of patients with minimum 5-year follow-up

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Dave Y. H. [1 ]
Karim, Sarina Abdul [1 ]
Chang, Haw Chong [1 ]
机构
[1] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
ligament reconstruction; return to sports;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: It is difficult to counsel the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient patient considering surgical reconstruction on the likelihood of eventual return to sports as information on this is lacking, especially in the Asian context. We wanted to determine how many of our patients who had ACL surgery returned to their previous levels of sports, 5 years after their surgery. For those that had not returned to their previous levels of sports, we wanted to identify their reasons for not doing so. Materials and Methods: Based on our inclusion criteria of a minimum 5-year follow-up after primary ACL reconstruction, 146 patients were identified for assessment. Sixty-four patients were successfully recalled. The mean age of our patients-was 24.8 years (range, 18 to 40). The patients completed the Lysholm Knee, Tegner activity and the Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaires. Clinical examination of the operated knee was performed according to the Objective IKDC evaluation form and with a KT-1000 arthrometer. Results: The mean Lysholm score was 85.2 and the mean subjective IKDC score was 79.5.81.2% of our patients had normal or nearly normal knees (IKDC A or B) with the remaining 18.8% at IKDC grade C. The mean side-side difference for anterior translation using the KT-1000 arthrometer was 1.2 mm. The median pre-injury Tegner activity level was 7 and the median 5-year post-surgery Tegner activity level was 6. Nineteen patients did not return to their pre-injury sports levels because of social reasons and were excluded. From the remaining 45 patients, 28 patients (62.2%) returned to their previous level of sports and 17 patients (28.8%) did not return to their previous level of sports. Of whom, 9 (20%) said that they did not return due to fear of re-injury and the remaining 8 (17.8%) said they had not returned because of knee instability and pain. At 5 years, the subgroup of patients who had returned to sport had the best scores: Lysholm (88.5), subjective IKDC (84.6) and IKDC Grade A&B (89.3%). When we compared this with the subgroups that did not return to sport because of fear of re-injury and because of an unstable knee, we found that the difference in knee outcome scores between these 3 groups were statistically significant. Conclusion: Sixty-two per cent of our patients returned to their previous level of sport at 5 years after ACL reconstruction. Fear of re-injury is an important psychological factor for these patients not returning to sports. Our results would allow the attending surgeon to counsel the ACL deficient patient who is considering surgical reconstruction the likelihood of eventual return to sports.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 278
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Influence of Sport Type on Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
    Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
    Voleti, Pramod B.
    Chang, Brenda
    Berkanish, Patricia
    Mahony, Gregory T.
    Williams, Riley J., III
    Altchek, David W.
    Allen, Answorth A.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (02): : 415 - 421
  • [22] Correlation between Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury Score at 6 Months after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Mid-Term Functional Test Results: An Observational Study at 5-Year Follow-Up
    Gerfroit, Alexis
    Marty-Diloy, Thibault
    Laboudie, Pierre
    Graveleau, Nicolas
    Bouguennec, Nicolas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (15)
  • [23] Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Meniscal Allograft Transplantation at a Mean 5-Year Follow-up
    Saltzman, Bryan M.
    Meyer, Maximilian A.
    Weber, Alexander E.
    Poland, Sarah G.
    Yanke, Adam B.
    Cole, Brian J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (03): : 550 - 562
  • [24] Bone tunnel remodeling at the site of biodegradable interference screws used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:: 5-year follow-up
    Lajtai, G
    Schmiedhuber, G
    Unger, F
    Aitzetmüller, G
    Klein, M
    Noszian, I
    Orthner, E
    ARTHROSCOPY, 2001, 17 (06): : 597 - 602
  • [25] Factors influencing return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Zaighum, Maryam
    Khan, Sumaiya
    Najjad, Kazim
    Sufyan, Muhammad
    Khatri, Dhanesh
    Anwar, Muhammad
    Batool, Gharira
    Saleem, Komal
    KHYBER MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL-KMUJ, 2024, 16 (04): : 297 - 301
  • [26] Anterior tibial translation and patient-reported outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tape locking screw: A 5-year follow-up study
    Manchado-Herrera, Ignacio
    Motta, Luci M.
    Blanco, Gustavo
    Gonzalez, Jesus
    Garces, Gerardo L.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2021, 107 (02)
  • [27] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus tendon - minimum 6 year clinical and radiological follow-up
    Buchner, Matthias
    Schmeer, Thorsten
    Schmitt, Holger
    KNEE, 2007, 14 (04): : 321 - 327
  • [28] Central third bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 5-year follow-up
    Patel, JV
    Church, JS
    Hall, AJ
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2000, 16 (01): : 67 - 70
  • [29] Arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft. A 5-year follow-up
    Pokar, S
    Wissmeyer, T
    Krischak, G
    Kiefer, H
    Kinzl, L
    Hehl, G
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2001, 104 (04): : 317 - 324
  • [30] RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT USING A LIGAMENT PROSTHESIS - A 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
    GILLQUIST, J
    ODENSTEN, M
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1988, 59 (01): : 94 - 95