Automation of penicillin adverse drug reaction categorisation and risk stratification with machine learning natural language processing

被引:0
|
作者
Inglis, Joshua M. [1 ,2 ]
Bacchi, Stephen [1 ,2 ]
Troelnikov, Alexander [3 ]
Smith, William [3 ]
Shakib, Sepehr [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Mail Delivery Point 22,North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide Med Sch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Clin Immunol & Allergy, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Sch Med, Discipline Clin Pharmacol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
Penicillin; Adverse drug reaction; Electronic health records; Machine learning; Natural language processing; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; ALLERGY; IMPACT; ALERTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104611
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background: The penicillin adverse drug reaction (ADR) label is common in electronic health records (EHRs). However, there is significant misclassification between allergy and intolerance within the EHR and most patients can be delabelled after an immunologic assessment. Machine learning natural language processing may be able to assist with the categorisation and risk stratification of penicillin ADRs. Objective: The aim of this study was to use text entered into an EHR to derive and evaluate machine learning models to classify penicillin ADRs and assess the risk of true allergy. Methods: Machine learning natural language processing was applied to free-text penicillin ADR data extracted from a public health system EHR. The model was developed by training on labelled dataset. ADR entries were split into training and testing datasets and used to develop and test a variety of machine learning models. These were compared to categorisation with a simple algorithm using keyword search. Results: The best performing model for the classification of penicillin ADRs as being consistent with allergy or intolerance was the artificial neural network (AUC 0.994, sensitivity 0.99, specificity 0.96). The artificial neural network also achieved the highest AUC in the classification of high- or low-risk of true allergy (AUC 0.988, sensitivity 0.99, specificity 0.99). All ADR labels were able to be classified using these machine learning models, whereas a small proportion were unclassifiable using the simple algorithm as they contained no keywords. Conclusion: Machine learning natural language processing performed similarly to expert criteria in classifying and risk stratifying penicillin ADRs labels. These models outperformed simpler algorithms in their ability to interpret free-text data contained in the EHR. The automated evaluation of penicillin ADR labels may allow realtime risk stratification to facilitate delabelling and improve the specificity of prescribing alerts.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine learning models automate classification of penicillin adverse drug reaction labels
    Inglis, Joshua M.
    Bacchi, Stephen
    Troelnikov, Alexander
    Smith, William
    Shakib, Sepehr
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2023, 53 (08) : 1485 - 1488
  • [2] Improving the performance of machine learning penicillin adverse drug reaction classification with synthetic data and transfer learning
    Stanekova, Viera
    Inglis, Joshua M.
    Lam, Lydia
    Lam, Antoinette
    Smith, William
    Shakib, Sepehr
    Bacchi, Stephen
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2024, 54 (07) : 1183 - 1189
  • [3] Natural Language Processing: A Machine Learning Perspective
    Ive, Julia
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, 2022, 48 (01) : 233 - 235
  • [4] Machine learning in statistical natural language processing
    Mochihashi, Daichi
    [J]. Kyokai Joho Imeji Zasshi/Journal of the Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, 2015, 69 (02): : 131 - 135
  • [5] Knowledgeable Machine Learning for Natural Language Processing
    Han, Xu
    Zhang, Zhengyan
    Liu, Zhiyuan
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2021, 64 (11) : 50 - 51
  • [6] Towards the automation of systematic reviews using natural language processing, machine learning, and deep learning: a comprehensive review
    Ofori-Boateng, Regina
    Aceves-Martins, Magaly
    Wiratunga, Nirmalie
    Moreno-Garcia, Carlos Francisco
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2024, 57 (08)
  • [7] Financial Risk Prediction and Management using Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing
    Li, Tianyu
    Dai, Xiangyu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 15 (06) : 211 - 219
  • [8] Artificial learning companionusing machine learning and natural language processing
    R. Pugalenthi
    A Prabhu Chakkaravarthy
    J Ramya
    Samyuktha Babu
    R. Rasika Krishnan
    [J]. International Journal of Speech Technology, 2021, 24 : 553 - 560
  • [9] Artificial learning companionusing machine learning and natural language processing
    Pugalenthi, R.
    Prabhu Chakkaravarthy, A.
    Ramya, J.
    Babu, Samyuktha
    Rasika Krishnan, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 24 (03) : 553 - 560
  • [10] Developing a deep learning natural language processing algorithm for automated reporting of adverse drug reactions
    McMaster, Christopher
    Chan, Julia
    Liew, David F. L.
    Su, Elizabeth
    Frauman, Albert G.
    Chapman, Wendy W.
    Pires, Douglas E. V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 137