Follow-up issues in children with mild traumatic brain injuries

被引:9
|
作者
Kania, Katarzyna [1 ]
Shaikh, Kashif Ajaz [1 ,2 ]
White, Ian Kainoa [1 ,2 ]
Ackerman, Laurie L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept Neurol Surg, Goodman Campbell Brain & Spine, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
关键词
traumatic brain injury; concussion; head injury; patient outcome assessment; acute concussion evaluation; trauma; ACUTE CONCUSSION EVALUATION; SPORTS; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.3171/2016.1.PEDS15511
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Concerns about mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) have increased in recent years, and neurosurgical consultation is often requested for patients with radiographic abnormalities or clinical findings suspicious for mTBI. However, to the authors' knowledge, no study has used the Acute Concussion Evaluation (ACE) tool to systematically evaluate the evolution of symptoms in patients with mTBI during neurosurgical follow-up. The goal in this study was to evaluate symptom progression in pediatric patients referred for neurosurgical consultation by using the ACE, as endorsed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective review of records of consecutive pediatric patients who had presented to the emergency department, were diagnosed with possible mTBI, and were referred for neurosurgical consultation. Outpatient follow-up for these patients included serial assessment using the ACE. Data collected included the mechanisms of the patients' injuries, symptoms, follow-up duration, and premorbid conditions that might potentially contribute to protracted recovery. RESULTS Of 91 patients identified with mTBI, 58 met the inclusion criteria, and 33 of these had sufficient follow-up data to be included in the study. Mechanisms of injury included sports injury (15 patients), isolated falls (10), and motor vehicle collisions (8). Ages ranged from 5 to 17 years (mean age 11.6 years), and 29 of the 33 patients were male. Six patients had preinjury developmental and/or psychiatric diagnoses such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Seventeen had negative findings on head CT scans. The first follow-up evaluation occurred at a mean of 30 days after injury. The mean number of symptoms reported on the ACE inventory at first follow-up were 3.2; 12 patients were symptom free. Patients with positive head CT findings required longer follow-up: these patients needed 14.59 weeks, versus 7.87 weeks of follow-up in patients with negative findings on head CT scans (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The data suggest that patients with mTBI, particularly those with developmental and/or psychiatric comorbidities and concurrent cerebral or extracranial injury, often report symptoms for several weeks after their initial injury. Serial ACE assessment permits systematic identification of patients who are experiencing continued symptoms, leading to appropriate patient management and referral.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 230
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Impact of Scheduled Telephone Follow-up on Decreasing Head Computed Tomography use in Children with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Nie, Hu
    Zou, Li Qun
    Jiang, Zhen
    He, Bin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2015, 30 (03) : E109 - E109
  • [22] LOSS-TO-FOLLOW UP FACTORS IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT-TREATED MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES
    Hsu, P.
    Kraus, J.
    Afifi, A. A.
    Vaca, F.
    Schaffer, K.
    [J]. INJURY PREVENTION, 2010, 16 : A270 - A270
  • [23] INTENSIVE CARE MANAGEMENT AND FOLLOW-UP OF SEVERE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY IN CHILDREN
    Vieira, H.
    Francisco, A.
    Vieira, M.
    Abecasis, F.
    Camilo, C.
    Miguens, J.
    Correia, M.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 : 294 - 295
  • [24] Examining the Relationship Between Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries and Development of Mental Illness Disorders in a Mid-Term Follow-up Period
    Wilder, J. Heath
    Gupta, Sanchita S.
    Kelly, Grace C.
    Logarbo, J. Nicholas
    Sanchez, Santiago L.
    Williams, Garrett H.
    Sherman, William F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2022, 101 (12) : 1117 - 1121
  • [25] Dimensions of postconcussive symptoms in children with mild traumatic brain injuries
    Ayr, Lauren K.
    Yeates, Keith Owen
    Taylor, H. Gerry
    Browne, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 15 (01) : 19 - 30
  • [26] Symptoms and Disability after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Five-Year Follow-up
    Magnusson, Beatrice M.
    Ahrenby, Erik
    Stalnacke, Britt-Marie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 23 (02)
  • [27] Protocol to Reduce Routine Follow-up Head Imaging in Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Stippler, Martina
    Nelton, Emmalin
    Keith, Stacey
    Rosen, Carlo
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 67 : 162 - 163
  • [28] Longitudinal follow-up of patients with mild traumatic brain injury by magnetic resonance spectroscopic technique
    Jing Chen
    Zi-Yi Guo
    Yin Zhang
    Qi-Zhou Liang
    Hai-Yan Liao
    Wen-Rui Su
    Qian-Yu Tang
    Shui-Xi Fu
    Cai-Xiang Chen
    Xiang-Jun Han
    [J]. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 2013, (05) : 410 - 412
  • [29] Outpatient follow-up after mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the UPFRONT-study
    de Koning, M. E.
    Scheenen, M. E.
    van der Horn, H. J.
    Hageman, G.
    Roks, G.
    Yilmaz, T.
    Spikman, J. M.
    van der Naalt, J.
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2017, 31 (08) : 1102 - 1108
  • [30] A randomized trial of two treatments for mild traumatic brain injury: 1 year follow-up
    Paniak, C
    Toller-Lobe, G
    Reynolds, S
    Melnyk, A
    Nagy, J
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2000, 14 (03) : 219 - 226