Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor antagonist and calcium antagonist on urinary podocytes in patients with IgA nephropathy

被引:61
|
作者
Nakamura, T
Ushiyama, C
Suzuki, S
Hara, M
Shimada, N
Sekizuka, K
Ebihara, I
Koide, H
机构
[1] Koto Hosp, Dept Med, Koto Ku, Tokyo 1360072, Japan
[2] Yoshida Hosp, Dept Pediat, Niigata, Japan
关键词
proteinuria; epithelial cell; calcium antagonist; angiotensin II;
D O I
10.1159/000013619
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The urinary podocyte is postulated to be a marker for estimation of the severity of active glomerular injury and a predictor of disease progression in children with glomerulonephritis. Non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, including verapamil, reduce proteinuria to an extent similar to that of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), including trandolapril, but to a greater extent than other antihypertensives. Angiotensin (Ang) II receptor antagonists, including candesartan cilexetil, show potent and long-term preventive effects against the progression of renal injury. The aim of the present study is to assess whether verapamil, trandolapril and candesartan cilexetil affect proteinuria and urinary podocytes in patients with IgA nephropathy. Thirty-two normotensive patients aged 18-54 years with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy, nonnephrotic proteinuria (1-3 g/day), and normal renal function (creatinine clearance >80 ml/min) were studied. Twenty patients with diffuse mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis (non-IgA PGN) and 20 healthy controls were also included in this study. The number of urinary podocytes in patients with advanced IgA nephropathy (n = 16) was significantly higher than that in patients with the disease in the mild stage (0 = 16) (p < 0.01) or in patients with non-IgA PGN (p < 0.01). Urinary podocytes were not detected in healthy controls. The 32 patients with IgA nephropathy were randomly divided into four treatment groups: those treated with verapamil (120 mg/day, n = 8); those treated with trandolapril (2 mg/day, n = 8); those treated with candesartan cilexetil (8 mg/day, n = 8), and those given a placebo (0 = 8). Treatment continued for 3 months. Antiproteinuric response in the trandolapril group was similar to that in the candesartan cilexetil group (-38 vs. -40%). The action of trandolapril or candesartan cilexetil was greater than that of verapamil (p < 0.01). Reduction in the number of urinary podocytes from baseline was significantly greater in patients treated with trandolapril or candesartan cilexetil than in patients treated with verapamil (p < 0.01). However, there was no difference between patients treated with trandolapril and those treated with candesartan cilexetil. Proteinuria and urinary podocytes were unaffected in the placebo group. These data suggest that urinary podocytes may be a marker of disease activity in adult patients with IgA nephropathy and that trandolapril and candesartan cilexetil are more effective than verapamil in reducing the number of podocytes. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 379
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Beneficial effect of combination therapy with an angiotensin II receptor antagonist and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on overt proteinuria in a patient with type 1 diabetic nephropathy
    Kuriyama, S
    Tomonari, H
    Abe, A
    Imasawa, T
    Hosoya, T
    NEPHRON, 2000, 86 (04): : 529 - 530
  • [22] Effects of adding an aldosterone receptor antagonist to an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in patients with hypertension
    Rossi, R
    Bursi, F
    Bonatti, S
    Fari, G
    Modena, MG
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 : 212 - 212
  • [23] Radiation nephropathy is treatable with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin II type-1 (AT1) receptor antagonist
    Moulder, JE
    Fish, BL
    Cohen, EP
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 46 (03) : 307 - 315
  • [24] ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITOR VERSUS CALCIUM-ANTAGONIST IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION
    BRUNNER, HR
    BIDIVILLE, J
    WAEBER, G
    PORCHET, M
    NUSSBERGER, J
    WAEBER, B
    NEPHRON, 1987, 47 : 87 - 89
  • [25] Combined effects of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and a calcium antagonist on renal injury
    Bakris, GL
    Griffin, KA
    Picken, MM
    Bidani, AK
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1997, 15 (10) : 1181 - 1185
  • [26] Cross-sensitivity between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonist.
    Touraud, JP
    Collet, E
    Louguet, C
    Sgro, C
    Dalac, S
    Dutronc, Y
    Lambert, D
    ANNALES DE DERMATOLOGIE ET DE VENEREOLOGIE, 2002, 129 (8-9): : 1033 - 1036
  • [27] Combination therapy with an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor antagonist ameliorates microinflammation and oxidative stress in patients with diabetic nephropathy
    Nakamura, Akihiko
    Shikata, Kenichi
    Nakatou, Tatsuaki
    Kitamura, Takuya
    Kajitani, Nobuo
    Ogawa, Daisuke
    Makino, Hirofumi
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2013, 4 (02): : 195 - 201
  • [28] Renal protective effects of blocking the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system: Angiotensin II type I receptor antagonist compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor
    Zhou, A
    Yu, L
    Li, JZ
    Zhang, JF
    Wang, HY
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2000, 23 (04) : 391 - 397
  • [29] Effects of an angiotensin II receptor antagonist and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on burst forming units-erythroid in chronic hemodialysis patients
    Naito, M
    Kawashima, A
    Akiba, T
    Takanashi, M
    Nihei, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 23 (05) : 287 - 293
  • [30] Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and calcium antagonist on endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension
    On, YK
    Kim, CH
    Oh, BH
    Lee, MM
    Park, YB
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2002, 25 (03) : 365 - 371