Personality and political preferences: The 2016 US Presidential Election

被引:5
|
作者
Abe, Jo Ann A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Connecticut State Univ, Dept Psychol, 501 Crescent St, New Haven, CT 06515 USA
关键词
Five Factor Model of Personality (FFM); Political preferences; Linguistic analysis; Liberal and conservative values "Populist" sentiment; HIGHER-ORDER FACTORS; CANDIDATE; CONSERVATIVES; LIBERALS; TRUMP; IDEOLOGY; SUPPORT; HAPPIER; TRAITS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study examined whether personality variables would account for political preferences during the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election using a demographically diverse sample of participants (N = 897). Study A revealed participants' ratings of their own personality and emotions were weakly associated with political preferences, but their ratings of candidates' personality showed robust associations, and were far more predictive of voting intention than all of the demographic variables, political affiliation, and racial attitudes combined. In Study B, linguistic analysis of narratives revealed words reflective of liberal values were correlated with positive evaluations of Clinton's personality, whereas words reflective of conservative values and "populist" sentiment were correlated with positive evaluations of Trump's personality, suggesting appraisals of candidates may be associated with values. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 82
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Obesity Prevalence and Voting Behaviors in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    An, Ruopeng
    Ji, Mengmeng
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2018, 42 (05): : 21 - 31
  • [32] An Analysis of Sentiments on Facebook during the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Alashri, Saud
    Kandala, Srinivasa Srivatsav
    Bajaj, Vikash
    Ravi, Roopek
    Smith, Kendra L.
    Desouza, Kevin C.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING ASONAM 2016, 2016, : 795 - 802
  • [33] Information in stock prices: the case of the 2016 US presidential election
    Blau, Benjamin M.
    Griffith, Todd G.
    Whitby, Ryan J.
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (40) : 4385 - 4396
  • [34] Legitimacy Troubles and the Performance of Power in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Mast, Jason L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CULTURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2017, 5 (03) : 460 - 480
  • [35] A Postmortem of Suspended Twitter Accounts in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Le, Huyen
    Boynton, G. R.
    Shafiq, Zubair
    Srinivasan, Padmini
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING (ASONAM 2019), 2019, : 258 - 265
  • [36] The 2016 US presidential election, opinion polls and the stock market
    Upadhyaya, Kamal
    Nag, Raja
    Ejara, Demissew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMIC POLICY, 2024, 16 (02) : 194 - 204
  • [37] A Spatial Exploration of the Halo Effect in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Miller, Jennifer A.
    Grubesic, Tony H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS, 2021, 111 (04) : 1094 - 1109
  • [38] Learning From the 2016 US General Election Presidential Debates
    Winneg, Kenneth
    Jamieson, Kathleen Hall
    [J]. AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2017, 61 (04) : 362 - 378
  • [39] Political preferences nowcasting with factor analysis and internet data: The 2012 and 2016 US presidential elections
    Franch, Fabio
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 166
  • [40] Contraceptive decision making after the 2016 US presidential election
    Judge, Colleen P.
    Borrero, Sonya
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (01) : 89 - 90