Risk Scores for Predicting Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in the Average-risk Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:78
|
作者
Peng, Le [1 ,2 ]
Weigl, Korbinian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Boakye, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Brenner, Hermann [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Clin Epidemiol & Aging Res, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, German Canc Consortium DKTK, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] German Canc Res Ctr, Natl Ctr Tumor Dis NCT, Div Prevent Oncol, Heidelberg, Germany
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2018年 / 113卷 / 12期
关键词
FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST; SCORING SYSTEM; ASYMPTOMATIC ADULTS; FAMILY-HISTORY; TASK-FORCE; CANCER; COLONOSCOPY; VALIDATION; ADENOMAS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1038/s41395-018-0209-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to summarize the available evidence on risk scores for predicting advanced colorectal neoplasia (advanced adenomas and cancer) in average-risk and asymptomatic populations undergoing screening colonoscopy. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched up to 28 March 2018. Studies that developed or validated a risk score to predict the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia were included. Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics including diagnostic performance indicators and assessed risk of bias and applicability in the included studies. Metaanalyses were conducted to determine the overall discrimination of risk scores evaluated by more than 1 study. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies including 17 original risk scores were identified. Risk scores included a median number of 5 risk factors. Factors most commonly included were age, sex, family history in firstdegree relatives, body mass index and smoking. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of risk scores ranged from 0.62 to 0.77 in the individual studies and from 0.61 to 0.70 in the meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of available risk scores had relatively weak discriminatory power, they may be of some use for risk stratification in CRC screening. Rather than developing more risk scores based on environmental risk factors, future research should focus on exploring possibilities of enhancing predictive power by combining risk factor data with novel laboratory matters, such as polygenetic risk scores.
引用
收藏
页码:1788 / 1800
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance of the Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score in stratifying the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Luu, Mai Ngoc
    Trinh, Nhi Ai
    Tran, Truc Le Thanh
    Dang, Thinh Phuong
    Hiyama, Toru
    Quach, Duc Trong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 39 (06) : 1000 - 1007
  • [22] Prevalence of Adenomas and Colorectal Cancer in Average Risk Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Heitman, Steven J.
    Ronksley, Paul E.
    Hilsden, Robert J.
    Manns, Braden J.
    Rostom, Alaa
    Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 7 (12) : 1272 - 1278
  • [23] Common sense for a common problem: the question of screening the average-risk population for colorectal neoplasia
    Vinden, C
    McAlister, VC
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 48 (06) : 431 - 432
  • [24] Risk prediction rule for advanced neoplasia on screening colonoscopy for average-risk individuals
    Ala I Sharara
    Ali El Mokahal
    Ali H Harb
    Natalia Khalaf
    Fayez S Sarkis
    Mustapha M El-Halabi
    Nabil M Mansour
    Ahmad Malli
    Robert Habib
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2020, (37) : 5705 - 5717
  • [25] Risk prediction rule for advanced neoplasia on screening colonoscopy for average-risk individuals
    Sharara, Ala, I
    El Mokahal, Ali
    Harb, Ali H.
    Khalaf, Natalia
    Sarkis, Fayez S.
    El-Halabi, Mustapha
    Mansour, Nabil M.
    Malli, Ahmad
    Habib, Robert
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (37) : 5705 - 5717
  • [26] Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines for Average-Risk and High-Risk Individuals: A Systematic Review
    Tanadi, Caroline
    Tandarto, Kevin
    Stella, Maureen Miracle
    Sutanto, Kenny Wijaya
    Steffanus, Mario
    Tenggara, Riki
    Bestari, Muhammad Begawan
    [J]. ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 62 (02) : 101 - 123
  • [27] Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Q.
    Yang, Z. -P.
    Xu, P.
    Gao, L. -C.
    Fan, D. -M.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (07) : E352 - E364
  • [28] Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy for Colorectal Cancer and Significant Neoplasia Detection in Average-Risk Population
    Hernandez, Vicent
    Cubiella, Joaquin
    Gonzalez-Mao, Carmen
    Rodriguez, Begona Iglesias
    Cid, Lucia
    Castro, Ines
    De-Castro, Luisa
    Vega, Pablo
    Hermo, Jose Antonio
    Macenlle, Ramiro
    Martinez, Alfonso
    Martinez-Ares, David
    Boullosa, Pamela Estevez
    Iglesias, Felipe
    Cid, Estela
    Vidal, Carmen
    Rivera, Concepcion
    Campo, Miriam Vazquez
    Hijona, Elizabeth
    Herreros, Marta
    Bujanda, Luis
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 142 (05) : S768 - S768
  • [29] APC Polymorphisms and the Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia: A HuGE Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liang, Jing
    Lin, Chunqing
    Hu, Fulan
    Wang, Fan
    Zhu, Lin
    Yao, Xiaoping
    Wang, Yibaina
    Zhao, Yashuang
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 177 (11) : 1169 - 1179
  • [30] PREVALENCE OF EARLY-AGE ONSET COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA IN AVERAGE RISK INDIVIDUALS UNDERGOING SCREENING COLONOSCOPY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Kolb, Jennifer M.
    Hu, Junxiao
    DeSanto, Kristen
    Gao, Dexiang
    Singh, Siddharth
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    Lieberman, David A.
    Boland, C. Richard
    Patel, Swati
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (06) : S181 - S182