Effect of time and ultrasonic activation on ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on smear layer removal of the root canal

被引:4
|
作者
Linhares de Castro, Fabio Pereira [1 ,2 ]
Pinheiro, Sergio Luiz [3 ]
Hungaro Duarte, Marco Antonio [4 ]
Duque, Jussaro Alves [4 ]
Fernandes, Samuel Lucas [4 ]
Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [2 ,6 ]
da Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo [5 ]
机构
[1] Sao Leopoldo Mandic Fac Dent, Endodont, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] Ctr Univ Norte Paulista UNORP, Fac Odontol UNIPOS, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Campinas, Dept Dent, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[4] Fac Morgana Potrich, Dept Clin Dent, Mineiros, Go, Brazil
[5] Sao Leopoldo Mandic Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[6] UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Aracatuba, Brazil
关键词
dentin; EDTA; scanning electron microscopy; smear layer; IN-VITRO; IRRIGATION SYSTEMS; DEBRIS REMOVAL; CITRIC-ACID; EDTA-T; DENTIN; PROTOCOLS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1002/jemt.22746
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of time and the ultrasonic activation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in removing the smear layer of at root canal. A total of 60 bovine inferior incisors were transversely sectioned and instrumented; A smear layer was added in the root dentin surface. The specimen were then divided into six groups according to the following final irrigation protocols: Group (G) 1: conventional irrigation with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); G2: conventional irrigation with NaOCl + EDTA for 20 s; G3: conventional irrigation with NaOCl + EDTA for 60 s; G4: passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) with NaOCl; G5: PUI with NaOCl + PUI with EDTA for 20 s; G6: PUI + NaOCl and PUI with EDTA for 60 s. Samples were analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 3500 increase. The images were measured by three blinded evaluators and classified in scores ranging from 1 to 5. The results were analyzed by the Pearson correlation test and the ANOVA nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests were used for the comparisons. Irrigated samples only with NaOCl (G1 and G4) had higher scores when compared with other groups. G5 and G6, irrigated with 17% EDTA and ultrasonic irrigation had lower scores. However, there was no statistically significant difference in G2 and G3, where there was no irrigation. It was concluded that irrigation with 17% EDTA for 20 s promoted the effective removal of smear layer, regardless of ultrasonic irrigation.
引用
收藏
页码:1062 / 1068
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Chitosan: a new solution for removal of smear layer after root canal instrumentation
    Silva, P. V.
    Guedes, D. F. C.
    Nakadi, F. V.
    Pecora, J. D.
    Cruz-Filho, A. M.
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2013, 46 (04) : 332 - 338
  • [32] Comparative analysis of smear layer removal from root canal walls.
    Oliveira, DP
    Teixeira, FB
    Ferraz, CCR
    Gomes, BPFA
    Souza, FJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B101 - B101
  • [33] Smear layer removal after Lightspeed and ProFile root canal instrumentation.
    Peters, OA
    Eggert, C
    Barbakow, F
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 134 - 134
  • [34] Removal of the root canal smear layer using Carisolv III and sodium hypochlorite
    Wu, Di
    Ma, Yong-zhen
    Jia, Jing
    Xin, Bing-chang
    Wang, Da-shan
    Sun, De-gang
    Wang, Ling-xiang
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (22) : E20372
  • [35] Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the efficacy of 5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for smear layer removal
    Orhan, Ekim Onur
    Bahadir, Duygu
    Akgun, Ceyda
    Aktas, Seher
    MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2021, 84 (02) : 253 - 260
  • [36] Effectiveness of passive ultrasonic irrigation time in the smear layer removal
    Tadeu, F.
    Madureira, R.
    Oliveira, O.
    Forner, L.
    BIODENTAL ENGINEERING II, 2014, : 35 - 37
  • [37] Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal at the Root Tip by Using Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid and Erbium, Chromium: Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium Garnet Laser
    Peeters, Harry Huiz
    Suardita, Ketut
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2011, 37 (11) : 1585 - 1589
  • [38] Evaluation of SmearOFF, maleic acid and two EDTA preparations in smear layer removal from root canal dentin
    Ballal, Nidambur Vasudev A.
    Jain, Himanshu
    Rao, Sheetal
    Johnson, Alexander D.
    Baeten, John
    Wolcott, James F.
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 77 (01) : 28 - 32
  • [39] Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals: A Comparative Study of Ultrasonic and Sonic Irrigant Activation Techniques
    Wigler, Ronald
    Srour, Yara
    Wilchfort, Yuval
    Metzger, Zvi
    Kfir, Anda
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2024, 12 (03)
  • [40] The effect of two different root canal sealers and smear layer on resistance to root fracture
    Çobankara, FK
    Üngör, M
    Belli, S
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2002, 28 (08) : 606 - 609