Socioeconomic status, work-life conflict, and mental health

被引:28
|
作者
Kim, Young-Mee [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Sung-il [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Inst Hlth & Environm, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
family demands; mental health; socioeconomic status; work-family conflict; work-life conflict; HOME-TO-JOB; FAMILY CONFLICT; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS; STRESS; OUTCOMES; DEMANDS; GENDER; DEPRESSION; SPILLOVER; EMPLOYEES;
D O I
10.1002/ajim.23118
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Work-life conflict (WLC) has a critical effect on employee mental health. However, research on occupational health has neglected the family domain. Furthermore, although it is reasonable to assume that the effect of WLC on health may differ according to socioeconomic circumstances, there is little empirical evidence for differences in the impact of WLC by socioeconomic status (SES). The purpose of this study was to assess the role of SES as an effect modifier, while examining whether the SES level affects the relationship between WLC and mental health. Method We analyzed data from the nationally representative South Korean Working Conditions Survey of 2014, including 49 401 workers. Logistic regression analyses, stratified by sexes, were performed to identify sex differences, and interaction terms including WLC and SES were also incorporated. Results WLC (men: OR = 1.24; women: OR = 1.18) and domestic demands (men: OR = 1.16; women: OR = 1.22) were significantly associated with mental health. WLC exhibited a stronger association with mental health for individuals with high SES, both in terms of education (men: OR = 1.61 vs 1.51; women: OR = 1.52 vs 1.24) and income (men: OR = 1.44 vs 1.10; women: OR = 1.48 vs 1.20). Conclusions Our data suggest that future efforts for health promotion should consider workers' family demands and SES as important modifying factors of psychological health in the workplace.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 712
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gender Diversity and Work-Life Conflict in Changing Times
    Lu, Luo
    Kao, Shu-Fang
    Chang, Ting-Ting
    Cooper, Cary L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (23) : 1 - 16
  • [42] Work-Life Conflict and Its Health Effects on Korean Gastroenterologists According to Age and Sex
    Jang, Eun Sun
    Park, Seon Mee
    Park, Young Sook
    Lee, Jong Chan
    Kim, Nayoung
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2020, 65 (01) : 86 - 95
  • [43] Work-Life Conflict of Women Employees in Selected Sectors
    Kumari, K. Thriveni
    Devi, V. Rama
    [J]. PACIFIC BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 9 (06): : 73 - 80
  • [44] Work-Life Conflict and Social Inequality in Western Europe
    McGinnity, Frances
    Calvert, Emma
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2009, 93 (03) : 489 - 508
  • [45] Stereotype threat as a psychological feature of work-life conflict
    Miller, Andrea L.
    [J]. GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2019, 22 (02) : 302 - 320
  • [46] WORK-LIFE CONFLICT AND ITS HEALTH EFFECTS ON KOREAN GASTROENTEROLOGISTS ACCORDING TO AGE AND GENDER
    Kim, Nayoung
    Jang, Eun Sun
    Park, Seon Mee
    Lee, Jong-chan
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (06) : S961 - S961
  • [47] HRD Interventions that Offer a Solution to Work-Life Conflict
    Hammer, Emily
    [J]. ADVANCES IN DEVELOPING HUMAN RESOURCES, 2021, 23 (02) : 142 - 152
  • [48] Work-Life Conflict in Britain: Job Demands and Resources
    Henz, Ursula
    Mills, Colin
    [J]. EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2015, 31 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [49] Partnership status and satisfaction with work-life balance
    Park, Yoobin
    MacDonald, Geoff
    Impett, Emily A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 32 (01) : 118 - 127
  • [50] Alcohol and cigarette use affecting the relationship between work-life conflict and physical health
    Roberto, Katherine J.
    Taylor, Jennifer F.
    [J]. COMMUNITY WORK & FAMILY, 2022, 25 (02) : 232 - 239