Preliminary probe of quality indicators and quality specification in total testing process in 5753 laboratories in China

被引:11
|
作者
Fei, Yang [1 ]
Kang, Fengfeng [2 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Zhao, Haijian [1 ]
He, Falin [1 ]
Zhong, Kun [1 ]
Wang, Zhiguo [1 ]
Chen, Wenxiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Hosp, Natl Ctr Clin Labs, 1 Dahua Rd, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Zhejiang Ctr Clin Labs, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
clinical laboratory; quality indicators; quality specification; total testing process; NATIONAL-SURVEY; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1515/cclm-2015-0958
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of the study was to promote the establishment and implementation of quality indicators (QIs) in clinical laboratories, catch up with the state of art, and provide preliminary quality specifications for established QIs. Methods: Clinical laboratories from different provinces in China were included in this QIs survey in 2015. All participants were asked to collect data related to QIs and complete QIs questionnaires. Defect percentages and sigma values were calculated for each QI. The 25th percentile, median, and the 75th percentile of defect percentages and TATs were calculated as optimum, desirable and minimum quality specifications. While 25th, median, and 75th of sigma values were calculated as minimum, desirable and optimum quality specifications, respectively. Results: Five thousand seven hundred and fifty-three clinical laboratories from 28 provinces in China participated in this survey. Median defect percentages of pre-examination QIs varied largely from 0.01% (incorrect sample container) to 0.57% (blood culture contamination) with sigma values varied from 4.0s to 5.1s. Median defect percentages of examination phase QIs were all really high. The most common problem in examination phase was test uncovered by inter-laboratory comparison (86.67%). Defect percentages of critical values notification and timely critical values notification were all 0.00% (6.0 sigma). While the median of defect percentages of incorrect laboratory reports was only 0.01% (5.4 sigma). Conclusions: Improvements are needed in all phases of total testing process (TTP) in laboratories in China, especially in examination phase. More attention should be paid when microbiology specimens are collected and results are reported. Quality specifications can provide directions for laboratories to make effort for.
引用
收藏
页码:1337 / 1345
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Quality Indicators for ICU: Process Parameters
    John, George
    Ramakrishnan, N.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 13 (04) : 196 - 200
  • [33] Developmental process of DGPPN quality indicators
    Grossimlinghaus, I.
    Falkai, P.
    Gaebel, W.
    Janssen, B.
    Reich-Erkelenz, D.
    Wobrock, T.
    Zielasek, J.
    [J]. NERVENARZT, 2013, 84 (03): : 350 - +
  • [34] Role of CLSI in Assuring Quality Testing in Clinical Laboratories
    Zakowski, Jack
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 1 (01): : 104 - 105
  • [35] Specification and Delivery of Quality Indicators in IP Packet eXchange Networks
    Skomersic, Marko
    Matijasevic, Maja
    Gojmerac, Ivan
    [J]. 2014 GLOBECOM WORKSHOPS (GC WKSHPS), 2014, : 618 - 623
  • [36] Developing quality indicators for cancer hospitals in China: a national modified Delphi process
    Liu, Meicen
    Yu, Qingyuan
    Liu, Yuanli
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [37] External quality assessment of medical laboratories in Croatia: preliminary evaluation of post-analytical laboratory testing
    Krleza, Jasna Lenicek
    Dorotic, Adrijana
    Grzunov, Ana
    [J]. BIOCHEMIA MEDICA, 2017, 27 (01) : 144 - 152
  • [38] Proposal of indicators of the Teaching/Learning process in vocational education in a context of total quality management
    Andres Fernandez, Miguel A.
    [J]. RELIEVE-REVISTA ELECTRONICA DE INVESTIGACION Y EVALUACION EDUCATIVA, 2005, 11 (01): : 63 - 82
  • [39] Validating quality indicators - Quality as relationship between structure, process, and outcome
    Salzer, MS
    Nixon, CT
    Schut, LJA
    Karver, MS
    Bickman, L
    [J]. EVALUATION REVIEW, 1997, 21 (03) : 292 - 309
  • [40] Six Sigma performance of quality indicators in total testing process of point-of-care glucose measurement: A two-year review
    Vincent, Anne
    Pocius, Donnah
    Huang, Yun
    [J]. PRACTICAL LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 25