What the New Measure of Thinking Contemporary Education

被引:1
|
作者
Uglanova, I. L. [1 ]
Pogozhina, I. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Inst Educ, Ctr Psychometr & Measurements Educ, Bld 10,16 Potapovsky Ln, Moscow 101000, Russia
[2] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Fac Psychol, Dept Psychol Educ & Pedag, Bld 9,11 Mokhovaya St, Moscow 125009, Russia
关键词
automated scoring; critical thinking; diagnostic measurement; formal operations; logical reasoning; logical thinking; performance-based assessment; Piaget; psychometrics; scenario-based problems; stealth assessment; OPERATIONAL THINKING; CONSTRUCTION; CONSERVATION; ACHIEVEMENT; VALIDATION; PIAGET; IQ;
D O I
10.17323/1814-9545-2021-4-8-34
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
For the pedagogical principle of assigning comprehensible and adequate tasks to be implemented, allowance should be made for students' individual levels of logical rea -soning, which requires diagnostic measures for objective and quick assessment. To-day, the "clinical method" allows the most comprehensive assessment of logical think-ing within the Piagetian framework. However, this diagnostic measure is extremely re-source-consuming, hence unsuitable for large-scale testing. An overview of literature shows that the existing standardized diagnostic measures require a great number of highly-qualified experts to review the scores and prepare feedback for teachers, in- structional designers, practicing psychologists and researchers. The article describes design methodology of an instrument to evaluate levels of logical reasoning that will allow automated scoring without sacrificing score meaning, eventually facilitating and accelerating the diagnostic measurement procedure. Imple-mentation of these principles is analyzed using the example of scenario-based tasks realized as computerized performance-based assessment in the form of stealth as-sessment of fifth-and seventh-grade pupils.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 23
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THINKING ABOUT NUTRITION EDUCATION - WHAT TO TEACH, HOW TO TEACH IT, AND WHAT TO MEASURE
    CONTENTO, I
    [J]. TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 1980, 81 (04): : 421 - 447
  • [2] Complex thinking to computational thinking: contemporary challenges in education
    Balladares Burgos, Jorge Antonio
    Aviles Salvador, Mauro Rodrigo
    Perez Narvaez, Hamilton Omar
    [J]. SOPHIA-COLECCION DE FILOSOFIA DE LA EDUCACION, 2016, (21): : 143 - 159
  • [3] A model of flexible thinking in contemporary education
    Barak, Miri
    Levenberg, Ariella
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2016, 22 : 74 - 85
  • [4] Science education - What are they thinking?
    Zacks, R
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1997, 277 (04) : 34 - 34
  • [5] What to Measure in Physical Education
    Wayman, Agnes
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1930, 1 (02): : 97 - 110
  • [6] IDENTITY, ALTERATION AND EDUCATION: THINKING CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS
    de Oliveira, Renato Jose
    [J]. REVISTA CONTEMPORANEA DE EDUCACAO, 2009, 4 (08): : 417 - 429
  • [7] ECOURAGEMENT OF STUDENTS TO CREATIVE THINKING IN CONTEMPORARY EDUCATION
    Koludrovic, Morana
    Ercegovac, Ina Reic
    [J]. ODGOJNE ZNANOSTI-EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 2010, 12 (02): : 427 - 439
  • [8] Critical Thinking in the Contemporary Education: A Historical Approach
    Babii, Alexandra-Niculina
    Neculau, Bogdan-Constantin
    [J]. META-RESEARCH IN HERMENEUTICS PHENOMENOLOGY AND PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY, 2019, 11 (02) : 782 - 791
  • [9] EDUCATION ON HUMAN RIGHTS: CONTEMPORARY THINKING IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
    do Nascimento Marreiro, Liana Siqueira
    Rodrigues, Maxweel Veras
    Lima Teixeira, Linnik Israel
    de Araujo Cavalcante, Sueli Maria
    [J]. REVISTA DO CURSO DE DIREITO DO UNIFOR, 2021, 12 (02): : 65 - 80
  • [10] New thinking on education
    Crozier M.
    [J]. Prospects, 1998, 28 (4) : 529 - 532