Genetic polymorphisms of selected DNA repair genes, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and breast cancer risk

被引:105
|
作者
Lee, KM
Choi, JY
Kang, CW
Kang, CP
Park, SK
Cho, HM
Cho, DY
Yoo, KY
Noh, DY
Ahn, SH
Park, CG
Wei, QY
Kang, DH
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul 110799, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Gen Surg, Canc Res Inst, Seoul 110799, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Seoul 110799, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Biol Sci, Taejon 305701, South Korea
[6] Konkuk Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Chuncheongbuk Do, South Korea
[7] Labgenom Co Ltd, Doosan Engn Ctr, Clin Res Inst, Kyonggi Do, South Korea
[8] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2534
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair genes seem to determine the DNA repair capacity, which in turn may affect the risk of breast cancer. To evaluate the role of genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair genes in breast cancer, we conducted a hospital-based case-control study of Korean women. Experimental Design: We included 872 incident breast cancer cases and 671 controls recruited from several teaching hospitals in Seoul from 1995 to 2002. Twelve loci of selected DNA repair genes were genotyped by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (XRCC2 Arg(188) His, XRCC4 921G > T XRCC6 1796G > T, LIG4 1977T/C, RAD51 135G > C, 172G > T, RAD52 2259C > T, LIG1 551A > C, ERM 8092A > C, 354C > T hMLH1 -93G > A, and lle(219)Val). Results: We found that the RAD52 2259 CT or TT hMLH1 -93 GG, and ERM 8092 AA genotypes were associated with breast cancer risk after adjustment for known risk factors [odds ratio (OR), 1.33; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.02-1.75; OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.991.74; and OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.89, respectively]. When Bonferroni's method was used to correct for multiple comparisons for nine polymorphisms with P = 0.005, all of these associations were not significant. However, the effects of RAD52 2259 CT or TT and ERM 354 CT or TT genotypes were more evident for the estrogen /progesterone receptor-negative cases (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.24-3.34 and OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.35-2.94, respectively). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that genetic polymorphisms of RAD52, ERM, and hMLH1 may be associated with breast cancer risk in Korean women.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:4620 / 4626
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Associations of Polymorphisms in the Genes of FGFR2, FGF1, and RBFOX2 With Breast Cancer Risk by Estrogen/Progesterone Receptor Status
    Cen, Yu-Ling
    Qi, Mei-Ling
    Li, Hai-Gang
    Su, Yi
    Chen, Li-Juan
    Lin, Ying
    Chen, Wei-Qing
    Xie, Xiao-Ming
    Tang, Lu-Ying
    Ren, Ze-Fang
    MOLECULAR CARCINOGENESIS, 2013, 52 : 52 - 59
  • [22] Genetic polymorphisms in miRNAs targeting the estrogen receptor and their effect on breast cancer risk
    Nguyen-Dien, Giang T.
    Smith, Robert A.
    Haupt, Larisa M.
    Griffiths, Lyn R.
    Nguyen, Hue T.
    META GENE, 2014, 2 : 226 - 236
  • [23] Genetic polymorphisms of estrogen receptor genes are associated with breast cancer susceptibility in Chinese women
    Zhijun Dai
    Tian Tian
    Meng Wang
    Tielin Yang
    Hongtao Li
    Shuai Lin
    Qian Hao
    Peng Xu
    Yujiao Deng
    Linghui Zhou
    Na Li
    Yan Diao
    Cancer Cell International, 19
  • [24] Genetic polymorphisms of estrogen receptor genes are associated with breast cancer susceptibility in Chinese women
    Dai, Zhijun
    Tian, Tian
    Wang, Meng
    Yang, Tielin
    Li, Hongtao
    Lin, Shuai
    Hao, Qian
    Xu, Peng
    Deng, Yujiao
    Zhou, Linghui
    Li, Na
    Diao, Yan
    CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [25] Progesterone Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer Risk
    Vang, Alecia
    Salem, Kelley
    Fowler, Amy M.
    ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 164 (04)
  • [26] Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, recreational physical activity and breast cancer risk
    McCullough, Lauren E.
    Santella, Regina M.
    Cleveland, Rebecca J.
    Millikan, Robert C.
    Olshan, Andrew F.
    North, Kari E.
    Bradshaw, Patrick T.
    Eng, Sybil M.
    Terry, Mary Beth
    Shen, Jing
    Crew, Katherine D.
    Rossner, Pavel, Jr.
    Teitelbaum, Susan L.
    Neugut, Alfred I.
    Gammon, Marilie D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 134 (03) : 654 - 663
  • [27] Folate Intake and Risk of Breast Cancer by Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status in a Swedish Cohort
    Larsson, Susanna C.
    Bergkvist, Leif
    Wolk, Alicja
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2008, 17 (12) : 3444 - 3449
  • [28] Dietary lignan intake and postmenopausal breast cancer risk by estrogen and progesterone receptor status
    Touillaud, Marina S.
    Thiebaut, Anne C. M.
    Fournier, Agnes
    Niravong, Maryvonne
    Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine
    Clavel-Chapelon, Francoise
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (06): : 475 - 486
  • [29] Association of smoking with breast cancer risk by estrogen and progesterone receptor status: the multiethnic cohort
    Gram, Inger T.
    Park, Song-Yi
    Kolonel, Laurence N.
    Maskarinec, Gertraud
    Wilkens, Lynne R.
    Haiman, Christopher
    Le Marchand, Loic
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [30] Body size and risk for breast cancer in relation to estrogen and progesterone receptor status in Japan
    Iwasaki, Motoki
    Otani, Tetsuya
    Inoue, Manami
    Sasazuki, Shizuka
    Tsugane, Shoichiro
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (04) : 304 - 312