Fertility Outcomes, Heritability and Genomic Associations of In-Group Preference and In-Group Marriage

被引:1
|
作者
Fieder, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Huber, Susanne [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Evolutionary Anthropol & Network Human Evolu, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Vienna, Ctr Relig & Transformat Contemporary Soc, Vienna, Austria
关键词
In-group favouritism and homogamy; reproduction; heritability; evolution; polygenic scores; RELIGIOSITY; EVOLUTION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1017/thg.2021.48
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Using data from the Midlife Development in the USA (MIDUS) sample (3070 men and 3182 women) and the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS; 2240 men and 2346 women), we aimed to investigate whether religious, ethnic and racial in-group preferences as well as religious homogamy are associated with reproductive outcome in terms of number of children. Using data from the MIDUS twin sample, we further estimated the inherited genetic component of in-group attitudes. Additionally, we analyzed the association of similar to 50 polygenic scores (PGSs) recently published for the WLS study and in-group attitudes as an indicator of potential pleiotropic effects. We found in both samples that, with one exception, religious though not other in-group attitudes are associated with a higher reproductive outcome. Also, religious homogamy is associated with higher average number of children. The inherited component of all in-group attitudes ranges from similar to 21% to 45% (MIDUS twin sample). PGSs associated with religious behavior are significantly positively associated with religious in-group attitudes as well as family attitudes. Further associations are found with PGS on life satisfaction (work) and, negatively, with PGS for any sort of addiction (smoking, alcohol and cannabis use), indicating pleiotropy. We conclude that the positive association between religious in-group attitudes as well as religious homogamy and reproductive outcome may indicate selective forces on religious in-group behavior. As all investigated in-group attitudes, however, have a substantial inherited component, we further speculate that potential previous reproductive benefits of racial and ethnic in-group preferences, if they ever existed, might have been substituted by religious in-group preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 272
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ON A COMBINATORIAL PROBLEM IN-GROUP THEORY
    HACHENBERGER, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL THEORY SERIES A, 1993, 64 (01) : 79 - 101
  • [42] Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition?
    Elfenbein, HA
    Ambady, N
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2002, 128 (02) : 243 - 249
  • [43] CLASSICS IN-GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY - RESPONSE
    ROLLER, B
    NELSON, V
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY, 1993, 43 (04) : 496 - 498
  • [44] Regulatory focus and in-group silence
    Tarui, Konomi
    Igarashi, Tasuku
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 353 - 353
  • [45] How In-Group Bias Influences Source Memory for Words Learned From In-Group and Out-Group Speakers
    Iacozza, Sara
    Meyer, Antje S.
    Lev-Ari, Shin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [46] Identity, homophily and in-group bias
    Currarini, Sergio
    Mengel, Friederike
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 90 : 40 - 55
  • [47] In-group bias in residency selection
    Bass, Adam
    Wu, Caren
    Schaefer, Jeffrey P.
    Wright, Bruce
    Mclaughlin, Kevin
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 (09) : 747 - 751
  • [48] Attributional mediation of in-group bias
    Chatman, CM
    von Hippel, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 37 (03) : 267 - 272
  • [49] In-group ritual and relational work
    Kadar, Daniel Z.
    Bax, Marcel M. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2013, 58 : 73 - 86
  • [50] In-Group Loyalty and the Punishment of Corruption
    Solaz, Hector
    De Vries, Catherine E.
    de Geus, Roosmarijn A.
    [J]. COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2019, 52 (06) : 896 - 926