Frequency Doubling Technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in migraine

被引:18
|
作者
Harle, DE
Evans, BJW
机构
[1] Inst Optometry, Neville Chappell Res Clin, London SE1 6DS, England
[2] City Univ London, Dept Optometry & Visual Sci, London, England
关键词
glaucoma; migraine; vision; visual fields;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00285.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
The literature suggests that visual field defects may be more common in people who experience migraine. The Humphrey frequency doubling (FDT) visual field instrument selectively examines the magnocellular visual pathway, but has not previously been used to investigate visual function in migraine. In a masked controlled study we compared Humphrey FDT and Humphrey Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm fields of 25 migraine sufferers with 25 age- and gender-matched controls. Although both mean deviation and pattern standard deviation were a little worse in the migraine group, these differences did not reach statistical significance. There were no inter-eye visual field differences in the migraine group compared with controls. Comparing the mean of all the contrast thresholds in each hemisphere, there were no more inter-hemifield visual field differences in the migraine group compared with controls. There was no significant difference between the migraine and control groups in intra-ocular pressures. The visual field parameters were not correlated with the interval since the last migraine headache, the severity of migraine headache, the duration of migraine headache or the number of migraine headaches per annum. In our data, there was no evidence of visual field deficits, a magnocellular deficit, or indications of glaucomatous pathology.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 239
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry
    Spry, PGD
    Johnson, CA
    McKendrick, AM
    Turpin, A
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2001, 42 (06) : 1404 - 1410
  • [2] Comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and achromatic standard automated perimetry in patients with migraine without aura and controls
    Goebel, K.
    Boyraz, M.
    Schroeder, A.
    Erb, C.
    [J]. KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2008, 225 (08) : 718 - 722
  • [3] Comparison of Standard Automated Perimetry, Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry, and Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry for Detection of Glaucoma
    Liu, Shu
    Lam, Shi
    Weinreb, Robert N.
    Ye, Cong
    Cheung, Carol Y.
    Lai, Gilda
    Lam, Dennis Shun-Chiu
    Leung, Christopher Kai-Shun
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2011, 52 (10) : 7325 - 7331
  • [4] Comparison between frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma
    Seong Ah Kim
    Chan Kee Park
    Hae-Young Lopilly Park
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 12
  • [5] Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry to standard achromatic automated perimetry in glaucoma
    Serguhn, S
    Spiegel, D
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1999, 40 (04) : S842 - S842
  • [6] Comparison between frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma
    Kim, Seong Ah
    Park, Chan Kee
    Park, Hae-Young Lopilly
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [7] Comparison of Standard Automated Perimetry, Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry, and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry to Monitor Glaucoma Progression
    Hu, Rongrong
    Wang, Chenkun
    Gu, Yangshun
    Racette, Lyne
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (07) : e2618
  • [8] Frequency-doubling perimetry: Comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma
    Leeprechanon, Narakorn
    Giangiacomo, Annette
    Fontana, Hector
    Hoffman, Douglas
    Caprioli, Joseph
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 143 (02) : 263 - 271
  • [9] Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage
    Soliman, MAE
    de Jong, LAMS
    Ismaeil, AA
    van den Berg, TJTP
    de Smet, MD
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (03) : 444 - 454
  • [10] A Comparison of Learning Effects for Standard Automated Perimetry, Short-wavelength Automated Perimetry and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry in Healthy Subjects
    Myers, Lorraine
    Hu, Rongrong
    Morgan, Linda S.
    Hoop, Joni S.
    Racette, Lyne
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)