The EU Commission's digital tax proposals and its cross-platform impact in the EU and the OECD

被引:8
|
作者
Lips, Wouter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Polit Sci, Ghent Inst Int Studies, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Tax; Digital economy; Corporate taxation in the EU; Multiple Streams Framework; tax avoidance; BEPS; MULTIPLE STREAMS APPROACH; COMPETITION; AMBIGUITY;
D O I
10.1080/07036337.2019.1705800
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The EU Commission's directive proposals on corporate taxation of digital multinationals, especially the digital services tax (DST), show the increased assertiveness of the Commission on taxation matters. Both inwards and outwards in the parallel OECD negotiations on digital taxation. By drawing on Kingdon's Multiple Streams Framework, elite interviews and policy documents, I assess the dynamics of the proposal at the EU and OECD. While the DST will fall short in the EU Council due to unanimity requirements, I argue that the Commission actually achieved its pre-prescribed goals. Within the EU, it provided coherency for unilateral DSTs by member states. At the OECD, the proposals increased the threat of uncoordinated unilateral measures. This created a period of uncertainty and pressured laggard states, which helped lead to a tentative window for reform. As such, the proposals are an example of cross-platform policy entrepreneurship by the EU Commission, projecting influence despite unanimity constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:975 / 990
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [11] Tax Transparency for Intermediaries: The Mandatory Disclosure Rules and Its EU Impact
    Cachia, Franklin
    [J]. EC TAX REVIEW, 2018, 27 (04): : 206 - 217
  • [12] Tax Shifts in EU-Member States: The Growing Impact of (Shifting) Recommendations by the European Commission on National Tax Policy
    Peeters, Bruno
    [J]. EC TAX REVIEW, 2016, 25 (03): : 114 - 116
  • [13] How Dr. Oetker's Digital Platform Strategy Evolved to Include Cross-Platform Orchestration
    Roevekamp, Patrick
    Ollig, Philipp
    Buhl, Hans Ulrich
    Keller, Robert
    Christmann, Albert
    Remmert, Pascal
    Thamm, Tobias
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY EXECUTIVE, 2022, 21 (01) : 17 - 30
  • [14] THE IMPACT OF EU'S ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION IN ITS PERIPHERY
    Danila, Mihai
    [J]. EUROPOLITY-CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN EUROPEAN GOVERNANCE, 2023, 17 (01): : 57 - 75
  • [15] The EU 'open Internet access' regulation and its impact on the digital press
    Holznagel, Bernd
    Hartmann, Sarah
    [J]. Convergence-The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 2016, 22 (05): : 488 - 493
  • [16] Platform lobbying: Policy influence strategies and the EU's Digital Services Act
    Gorwa, Robert
    Lechowski, Grzegorz
    Schneiss, Daniel
    [J]. INTERNET POLICY REVIEW, 2024, 13 (02):
  • [17] Is health recognized in the EU's policy process? An analysis of the European Commission's impact assessments
    Stahl, Timo P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 20 (02): : 176 - 181
  • [18] Governing the EU's Energy Crisis: The European Commission's Geopolitical Turn and Its Pitfalls
    Siddi, Marco
    Prandin, Federica
    [J]. POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2023, 11 (04): : 286 - 296
  • [19] EU structural support and its impact on Lithuania's progress
    Tamosiuniene, Rima
    Sidlauskas, Skirmantas
    Trumpaite, Ingrida
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 8 (03) : 177 - 187
  • [20] Digital Gap in EU Countries and its Impact on Labour Productivity and Global Competitiveness
    Polozova, Tetiana
    Kolupaieva, Irina
    Sheiko, Iryna
    [J]. HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS, VOL 11(1), 2021, 11 : 659 - 670