Generalized Craig-Bampton Method Using Robin Boundary Conditions

被引:0
|
作者
Gruber, Fabian M. [1 ]
Rutzmoser, Johannes B. [1 ]
Rixen, Daniel J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Fac Mech Engn, Inst Appl Mech, Boltzmannstr 15, D-85748 Garching, Germany
关键词
Dynamic substructuring; Component mode synthesis; Model order reduction; Craig-Bampton method; Robin boundary condition;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-30249-2_8
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Dynamic substructuring is an efficient way to reduce the size and to analyse the dynamical behaviour of large models. The most popular approach is a fixed-interface method, the Craig-Bampton method (CBM, 1968), which is based on fixed-interface vibration modes and interface constraint modes. On the other hand, free-interface methods employing free-interface vibration modes together with attachment modes are also used, e.g. MacNeal's method (1971) and Rubin's method (1975). The dual Craig-Bampton method (DCBM, 2004 proposed by Rixen) uses the same ingredients as the methods of MacNeal and Rubin, but assembles the substructures using interface forces (dual assembly). The mixed Craig-Bampton (2011, proposed by Voormeeren et al.) method can deal with a mix of CBM and DCBM reduced substructures but each substructure has to be reduced either with the CBM or with the DCBM. The CBM and DCBM are using interface conditions which are extremal cases of the real connecting conditions. We want to generalize the CBM and the DCBM interface conditions to substructures connected via Robin boundary conditions. The CBM and the DCBM are then the two extreme cases of this generalized formulation, either having infinite stiffness or zero stiffness on the interface. Although reduction bases using interface loading were proposed in the past by Chandler and Tinker (1997), we want to combine in a coherent manner the way the bases are computed at substructure level and the way the assembly is formulated, hoping to construct a quasi-diagonal form for the reduced system.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 115
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Tactile Response Characterization of a Dynamic System Using Craig-Bampton Method
    Pradeepkumar, S.
    Nagaraj, P.
    [J]. SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2022, 56 (03): : 221 - 233
  • [12] Dual Craig-Bampton Method with Reduction of Interface Coordinates
    Gruber, Fabian M.
    Buerchner, Tim L.
    Rixen, Daniel Jean
    [J]. DYNAMICS OF COUPLED STRUCTURES, VOL 4, 2017, : 143 - 163
  • [13] Improved Craig-Bampton stochastic method for spacecraft vibroacoustic analysis
    Yotov, V. V.
    Remedia, M.
    Aglietti, G. S.
    Richardson, G.
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2021, 178 : 556 - 570
  • [14] A symmetric Craig-Bampton method of coupled fluid-structure systems
    IABG, Ottobrunn, Germany
    [J]. Eng Comput (Swansea Wales), 4 (450-461):
  • [15] Dynamic substructure tire model based on modified craig-bampton method
    Zhang, Xiaoyang
    Sun, Beibei
    Chen, Nan
    Sun, Qinghong
    [J]. Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2009, 40 (09): : 41 - 45
  • [16] On the dual Craig-Bampton method for the forced response of structures with contact interfaces
    Zucca, Stefano
    [J]. NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2017, 87 (04) : 2445 - 2455
  • [17] A symmetric Craig-Bampton method of coupled fluid-structure systems
    Wandinger, J
    [J]. ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 1998, 15 (04) : 450 - +
  • [18] A Craig-Bampton test-analysis model
    Blades, EL
    Craig, RR
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS CONFERENCE - IMAC, VOLS I AND II, 1997, 3089 : 1386 - 1391
  • [19] Selection of component modes for Craig-Bampton substructure representations
    Kammer, DC
    Triller, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1996, 118 (02): : 264 - 270
  • [20] A modal derivatives enhanced Craig-Bampton method for geometrically nonlinear structural dynamics
    Wu, L.
    Tiso, P.
    van Keulen, F.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF ISMA2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NOISE AND VIBRATION ENGINEERING AND USD2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNCERTAINTY IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2016, : 3615 - 3624