Comparison of internal fixation with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures -: Randomized, controlled trial performed at four years

被引:178
|
作者
Blomfeldt, R [1 ]
Törnkvist, H [1 ]
Ponzer, S [1 ]
Söderqvist, A [1 ]
Tidermark, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Soder Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Dept Orthopaed, S-11883 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
关键词
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.D.02655
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recent randomized, controlled trials performed at two years postoperatively have shown that a primary total hip replacement is superior to internal fixation for the treatment of a displaced femoral neck fracture in a relatively healthy, mentally competent, elderly patient. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes at four years. Methods: One hundred and two patients (mean age, eighty years) who had an acute displaced femoral neck fracture were randomly allocated to be treated with total hip replacement or internal fixation. The inclusion criteria were an age of at least seventy years, absence of severe cognitive dysfunction, an independent living status, and the ability to walk independently. The main outcome measurements were hip complications, reoperations, hip function, and health-related quality of life. Results: The mortality rate was 25% in both groups. At the forty-eight-month follow-up evaluation, the rate of hip complications was 4% in the patients treated with total hip replacement and 42% in those treated with internal fixation (p < 0.001) and the reoperation rates were 4% and 47%, respectively (p < 0.001). The arthroplasty group had no additional hip complications or reoperations between the twenty-four and forty-eight-month follow-up visits. In the fixation group, the percentage of hip complications increased from 36% to 42% and the percentage of reoperations increased from 42% to 47% during the same period. The hip function was significantly better and the decline in health-related quality of life was less pronounced in the arthroplasty group than it was in the fixation group at the four, twelve, and twenty-four-month follow-up evaluations. Ninety-seven percent of the patients in the arthroplasty group and 57% of the patients in the fixation group who were available for follow-up at forty-eight months had no hip complications (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Compared with internal fixation, primary total hip replacement provides a better outcome for mentally competent elderly patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture. The complication and reoperation rates were significantly lower and hip function and health-related quality of life were at least as good at four years after the surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1680 / 1688
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cemented compared to uncemented femoral stems in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: study protocol for a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (CHANCE-trial)
    Ghazi Chammout
    Olle Muren
    Henrik Bodén
    Mats Salemyr
    Olof Sköldenberg
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 17
  • [22] HOPE-trial: hemiarthroplasty compared to total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly-elderly, a randomized controlled trial
    Olof Sköldenberg
    Ghazi Chammout
    Sebastian Mukka
    Olle Muren
    Hans Nåsell
    Carl-Johan Hedbeck
    Mats Salemyr
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 16
  • [23] Cemented compared to uncemented femoral stems in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: study protocol for a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (CHANCE-trial)
    Chammout, Ghazi
    Muren, Olle
    Boden, Henrik
    Salemyr, Mats
    Skoldenberg, Olof
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2016, 17
  • [24] Hemiarthroplasty compared to internal fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws as treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: cost-utility analysis performed alongside a randomized, controlled trial
    Bjornelv, G. M. Waaler
    Frihagen, F.
    Madsen, J. E.
    Nordsletten, L.
    Aas, E.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 23 (06) : 1711 - 1719
  • [25] Hemiarthroplasty compared to internal fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws as treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: cost-utility analysis performed alongside a randomized, controlled trial
    G. M. Waaler Bjørnelv
    F. Frihagen
    J. E. Madsen
    L. Nordsletten
    E. Aas
    Osteoporosis International, 2012, 23 : 1711 - 1719
  • [26] More complications with uncemented than cemented femoral stems in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 69 patients
    Chammout, Ghazi
    Muren, Olle
    Laurencikas, Evaldas
    Boden, Henrik
    Kelly-Pettersson, Paula
    Sjoo, Helene
    Stark, Andre
    Skoldenberg, Olof
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2017, 88 (02) : 145 - 151
  • [27] The total costs of a displaced femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation and total hip replacementA randomised study of 146 hips
    Torsten Johansson
    Margareta Bachrach-Lindström
    Per Aspenberg
    Dick Jonsson
    Ola Wahlström
    International Orthopaedics, 2006, 30 : 1 - 6
  • [28] A COMPARISON OF INTERNAL-FIXATION AND PROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT FOR FEMORAL-NECK FRACTURES
    TERJESEN, T
    NESSE, O
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1980, 51 (02): : 371 - 371
  • [29] Biases in a randomized comparison of three types of screw fixation in displaced femoral neck fractures
    Alho, A
    Austdal, S
    Benterud, JG
    Blikra, G
    Lerud, P
    Raugstad, TS
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 69 (05): : 463 - 468
  • [30] What is the best choice for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly? Internal fixation or total/hemiarthroplasty
    Atik, O. Sahap
    EKLEM HASTALIKLARI VE CERRAHISI-JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2012, 23 (03): : 121 - 121