Immediate Catheter Drainage Versus Delayed Drainage in the Management of Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis

被引:3
|
作者
Dost, Wahidullah [1 ]
Qasemi, Farzad [1 ]
Ali, Wahida [1 ]
Aini, Tahmina [1 ]
Rasully, Mohammad Qaher [1 ]
Niazi, Jamaluddin [2 ]
Jamal, Rana Sarhadi [1 ]
Sayer, Maseha [1 ]
Qadar, Laila Tul [3 ]
Afzali, Sultan Masoud Shah [1 ]
机构
[1] Liaquatian Acad & Res Soc, Gen Surg, Hyderabad, Pakistan
[2] Punjab Inst Cardiol, Cardiovasc Surg, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Internal Med, Karachi, Pakistan
关键词
necrotizing pancreatitis; immediate drainage; delayed; drainage; acute pancreatitis; INTERVENTION; NECROSECTOMY; DEBRIDEMENT;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.26485
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Immediate or delayed catheter drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis remains a subject of debate. The present study aimed to evaluate the optimum timing for drainage in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Methods: A prospective, observational study was undertaken at the Department of Surgery, Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences (LUMHS), between 1st March 2018 and 6th July 2020. All patients 18 years or older presenting with acute pancreatitis (AP) in whom necrotizing pancreatitis was confirmed or suspected were enrolled in the study. The exclusion criteria included prior intervention for necrotizing pancreatitis. Those who were diagnosed with infected necrotizing pancreatitis were labeled as Group A and Group B. Group A patients underwent immediate catheter drainage (within 24 h of admission) while Group B patients underwent delayed drainage (after 24 h). Clinical outcome variables including complication rate, mortality, length of hospital, and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were collected in a predefined pro forma. Results: One hundred and thirty patients were enrolled in the study. There were 65 patients in each group. The present study revealed no significant differences in patient outcomes in the immediate drainage group vs. the postponed drainage group. Overall, the mortality rate was 15.38% in Group A while the mortality rate was a little lower in Group B, i.e. 10.77% (p=0.44). The acute onset multiple organ failure was lower in Group A as compared to Group B, however, the difference was statistically insignificant (p=0.08). The rate of wound infection rate was 10.77% and 15.38% in Group A and Group B, respectively (p=0.61). Conclusion: In the present study, we failed to find any significant difference between the immediate and postponed drainage group in terms of patient outcome. As per current findings, the timing of drainage did not impact the prognosis of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS: COMPARISON OF COMPLICATIONS IN ENDOSCOPIC CATHETER DRAINAGE VERSUS SURGICAL NECROSECTOMY IN ACUTE INFECTED NECROTIZING PANCREATITIS
    Moole, Vishnu
    Gunukala, Shravan
    Duvvuri, Abhiram
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S48 - S48
  • [22] No debridement is necessary for symptomatic or infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: Delayed, mini-retroperitoneal drainage for acute necrotizing pancreatitis without debridement and irrigation
    Chang, Yu-Chung
    Tsai, Hong-Min
    Lin, Xi-Zhang
    Chang, Chia-Hao
    Chuang, Jen Pin
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2006, 51 (08) : 1388 - 1395
  • [23] No Debridement Is Necessary for Symptomatic or Infected Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Delayed, Mini-Retroperitoneal Drainage for Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis Without Debridement and Irrigation
    Yu-Chung Chang
    Hong-Min Tsai
    Xi-Zhang Lin
    Chia-Hao Chang
    Jen Pin Chuang
    [J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2006, 51 : 1388 - 1395
  • [24] Percutaneous Catheter Drainage in Infected Pancreatitis Necrosis: a Systematic Review
    Lichi Ke
    Junhua Li
    Peihong Hu
    Lianqun Wang
    Haiming Chen
    Yaping Zhu
    [J]. Indian Journal of Surgery, 2016, 78 : 221 - 228
  • [25] Percutaneous Catheter Drainage in Infected Pancreatitis Necrosis: a Systematic Review
    Ke, Lichi
    Li, Junhua
    Hu, Peihong
    Wang, Lianqun
    Chen, Haiming
    Zhu, Yaping
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 78 (03) : 221 - 228
  • [26] Endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis:Progress and challenges
    Yan Zeng
    Jian Yang
    Jun-Wen Zhang
    [J]. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2023, (09) : 1888 - 1902
  • [27] Endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: Progress and challenges
    Zeng, Yan
    Yang, Jian
    Zhang, Jun-Wen
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2023, 11 (09) : 1888 - 1902
  • [28] Predictive factors of pancreatic necrosectomy following percutaneous catheter drainage as a primary treatment of patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis
    Cao, Xi
    Cao, Feng
    Li, Ang
    Gao, Xiang
    Wang, Xiao-Hui
    Liu, Dian-Gang
    Fang, Yu
    Guo, Dong-Hai
    Li, Fei
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (05) : 4397 - 4404
  • [29] Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: role of CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage
    Segal, Dmitri
    Mortele, Koenraad J.
    Banks, Peter A.
    Silverman, Stuart G.
    [J]. ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2007, 32 (03): : 351 - 361
  • [30] Risk Factors of Surgical Necrosectomy After Percutaneous Catheter Drainage for Necrotizing Pancreatitis
    Wang, G.
    Duan, P.
    Ma, Y.
    Li, X.
    Qu, F.
    Ji, L.
    Guo, X.
    Zhang, W.
    Xiao, F.
    Li, L.
    Hu, J.
    Sun, B.
    [J]. PANCREAS, 2019, 48 (10) : 1542 - 1542